can yo believe it?

>no whites

Thank fucking god
The good guys win for once

>>80750907
Power Rangers has always been diverse, what the fuck are they smoking?

>>80750934
Yeah but it's never been a superhero movie

whats the endgoal here

>>80751009
>Power Rangers: The movie
>Not a movie
Ok

Also fuck Latisha there, there're tons of "diverse" characters in comics, dunno why Marvel doesn't want to use them (Glory Grant, Michelle, Ganke, Randy, etc) but instead racebends white characters, it's absurd, they complain about the "lack" of characters of color when they don't even use the ones in the source material. I don't mind diversity but mindless racebending annoys the shit out of me

File: up up and away.jpg (51KB, 480x278px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 480x278px

>>80750907
I can't believe people forgot this

>>80751096
is that black arnold back there

STATIC SHOCK?

>>80751096

WE

>>80751136
STEAL

BUT BLACKS DON'T READ COMICS.

>>80751152
YO

>>80751152
YO

>>80750907
>can you believe how retarded people are

yes most certainly

>>80751048
Money
Companies don't care about minorities, but they know that if you throw at them bones like these they are more likely to pay for their product even if they never did before, knowing how times are nowadays they try some virtuesignaling, some progressiveness, etc and that affects their income. This is all for the money.

They also know that angry fans will still watch their movies, as it has been with comics for at least 2 decades. So it's a win/no lose scenario.

>>80751136

ARE THE CHAMPIONS

>>80750907
16 years ago blacks hated white nerd shit, what happened?

>>80751136
ARE THE CRYSTAL GEMS

File: 1488716935703.jpg (77KB, 583x481px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 583x481px

>>80751096
That fucking *WE* on his chest!

>>80751198
kek

>>80750907
#blessed

>>80751185
Gibs me dat effect
Like with kids, at first will look uninterested, but when they see the other kid having fun they'll go out of their way to have that too

>>80751170
>they also know that angry fans will still watch their movies, as it has been with comics for at least 2 decades
But the comic industry is dead. The more they force "diversity" the more people they lose. The diversity train is just now rolling up in Marvel movies so we will see if the same thing happens to the movies.

>>80751198
WE WUZ SUPAH HEEROS N SHIIIEET!

>>80751095
It's a movie but it wasn't a superhero movie, the new one is straight up aping capeshit

File: 1490070837616.gif (2MB, 300x315px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x315px

>>80751095
>racebending fictional characters bothers me
This is literally what autism is.

>>80750907
I don't really understand this. If you showed them a trailer of an awful movie but it was 100% niggers, would they still go see it in theaters and go on about how great it is? I don't understand how anyone can enjoy a film based simply on the color of the actors skin.

I don't watch all black, asian or latino films and then get giddy and excited when a white person shows up, so why do they?

Furthermore, are they legitimately enjoying, or are they just claiming to while ignoring all flaws based on their one check mark of quality?

>>80751249
>Heroes
>Powers
>Incessantly quipping
It was a Superhero movie by today standards

>OMFG I LITERALLY CAN'T EVEN! A BLACK IN CAPESHIT? WTF THIS IS, DARE I SAY, WHITE GENOCIDE REEEE IS MY NETFLIX SUBSCRIPTION CANCELLED YET? JESUS FUCK I AM SO TRIGGERED! NOT MUH FICTIONAL CHARACTERS!!!! SAVE ME MAGA!!

>>80750907
That's Marvel for ya

>>80751170
but doesnt this alienate the majority of people?

>>80751302
Dude, are you ok? do you want me to call 911?

>>80751276
>I don't watch all black, asian or latino films and then get giddy and excited when a white person shows up, so why do they?
Because one skin color is the norm in American cinema...the others aren't. You would act all giddy if it was 100 years of black actors and then, all of a sudden in your lifetime, there were a handful of whites.

I can't understand why this is a hard concept to empathize with if you aren't autistic.

>>80751154
You must be sheltered.
Blacks are a lot more open about nerd stuff like that. I've seen full grown basketball tier negroes raving about marvel, dc, moe anime and yu gi oh.

>>80751338
IDK MARY JANE IS GONNA BE A BLACK REEEEE I CANT EVEN, MUH FISTS ARE SHAKING? WHAT DO?

>>80751337
>>80751229
Comics in general have been selling less than before, yes, but that has nothing to do with force diversity and everything to do with piracy and internet. Strong emotions sell better, is better to have your reader angry than apathetic, and Marvel has been using this for at least 2 decades and still sells more than DC

>>80751386
>Sheltered

Nigger I own a comic book store.

>>80751393
There's a difference between putting a colored character (Glory Grant for example, black gf of Spider-man) and racebending a character (being MJ or The Old One in Dr Strange), second is just wrong.

I want to see characters like Gloria, Randy, Monica Rambeau, etc, but they always forget about them, why?

>>80751438
Then you're a sheltered comic book store owner if you think black people don't read comics.

>>80751443
Because it sells more in the minorities if you say the white men never had POC characters in the comics to beging with, if you fake scarcity it seems like a #blessing when you turn a white character into black or whatever

>>80751276
It's all about representation but it's getting to the point where these people don't care about anything but representation and social issues. A film can be a massive turd but if it features a diverse cast, feminist undertones, and a gay or transgender subplot, they don't care. Film has become so ingrained in culture that they see their issues reflected in films as a sign of social change.

>>80751443
OMFG IT IS SO WRONG YOU ARE CORRECT! HOW DARE THEY RACEBEND FICTIONAL CHARACTERS??? DONT THEY KNOW I HATE NIGGERS AND CAN'T RELATE TO THEM IF THEY ARENT WHITE? THIS IS A GENOCIDE ANON. THE JEWS MUST BE BEHIND THIS. DAY OF THE ROPE! HULU, NETFLIX AND CRACKLE SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL CANCELED!!

File: IMG_1378.jpg (37KB, 480x404px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 480x404px

But Suicide Squad came out last year?

>>80751386
>yugioh
They love that shit I dunno why
I played for a couple of years (introduced by friends etc) and the majority of players were Black

>>80751443
>calling them "colored"
What year is this?

>>80751360
>a handful

There's a disproportionate amount of black actors on screen relative to population though

>>80751530
Current
Btw, what'st he difference between person of color and colored person?

>>80751558
>the disproportionate meme
Yeah, that isn't a real thing in adult conversation. If you want to be obtuse and miss the point like a retard, go ahead

You are on the wrong board though

File: Wesley-Snipes-Blade-FilmFad.com_-1.jpg (118KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1280x720px

FUUUUUCK YOUUUUU

>diverse
>it's just black people
When will this word finally die?

>>80751561
One is what they hate to be called. The other isn't. Language changes over time. You don't get to decide by yourself how.

>>80751614
Oh yeah because I'm the one being childish here and you're the adult, right

>>80751185
capitalism

>>80751645
I'm not the one resorting to the /pol/ "disproportionate" meme in films as if that makes any fucking sense in the slightest.

Please tell me which of my posts you responded to, was childish

>>80751674
Which part is meme again?
nice bait job idiot, kill yourself or upgrade if you want another (You)vote

File: 1381733721493.png (489KB, 916x768px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 916x768px

>>80750907
I truly dont understand people like this.

For example, people are saying how great, diverse and progressive it is that mass effect Andromeda doesnt have the ability to be a white person. When pointed out that its racist, they ask how, and when you tell em to flip the scenario (no blacks in the game, just white) they flip their shit and scream about equality.

Do they not grasp the simple fucking fact that excluding a race purposelessly (ie, going out of your way) is the thing they fought to end for almost a hundred fucking years?

And why do they keep trying to shove this 'diversity' problem down out throats when theres tons of great shows that WERE actually diverse and empowering to minority's and they didnt have a negative stigma to them.

Power rangers had a gay guy, an asian chick, a white chick, a black guy and a fucking chode.
Fresh prince was 95% black and had some of the highest ratings of all time and made will smith a bankable star. Hell, its hard to find someone who hated the show.
One of the best super hero movies of the 90's was a black super hero.

None of these caused problems because it was about the product and not some race shit. Why cant they see that their being racist 24/7 and dragging every god damn thing INTO race talks is destroying nice things and hurting everyone

>>80750907

now that superhero movies have been done to death and the genre is imploding, they squeeze the last few gimmick dollars out of it.

File: Morpheus-Matrix-Laurence-Fishburne-a.jpg (54KB, 500x547px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x547px

What if i told you that these sheltered people are only doing this for brownie points on their social media accounts

>>80750907
>Guys, we could use Ganke!
>No, turn handsome and blond Ned Leeds into an Asian fatty
>Guys, we could use Randy!
>No, turn tall and atheltic Flash into short and ugly latino
>Guys, we could use Michelle!
>No, turn MJ into a latina
>Guys, we could use Glory!
>No, turn Liz into a black
No wonder comics "don't" have people of color, they never use the ones they have

File: yep_its_trash.png (450KB, 454x600px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 454x600px

>>80751259
Using literally like this is literally autism.

>>80750907

>@runtheworld

>>80750907
This image makes me want to puke..

Am I racist?

>>80751739
It isn't bait, saying that ethnicities are "le disproportionate" in movies is a fucking retarded metric that makes no real sense and has no value to the discussion. It's a dumb /pol/-tier meme.

By that backwards logic, whites are overrepresented then. So why aren't you glad there are more blacks and Asians in film? You don't want them to be le disproportionate, right?

>>80751168
S

>>80751777
/thread

>>80751767
This.

Quite literally an entire lifestyle built around retweets and Likes.

>>80750907
How is the Black Panther pic diverse? It's four people and they're all the same ethnicity.
That's literally the opposite of diverse.

>>80751519
Will Smith isn't a real "black"

>>80751789
WE

>>80750907
I would say superhero films are already highly diverse in terms of characters, backgrounds and such. but all these people care about is the diversity of skin color.

File: TRUE PROGRESSIVENESS.jpg (575KB, 685x1211px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 685x1211px

>>80750907
YASSSSSS

>>80751837
No, they only care about Blacks

>>80751823
>all black people are the same ethnicity
>all shades of black are the same ethnicity
>Amerifats believe this

>>80751795
>point out there's more SAG black actors as a percent than in the general population
>*autistic screeching*

Hope you're baiting now

>>80750907
thank god, white people are boring and ugly

>>80751854
>bias towards Caucasian looks
Nope, those girls in that pic are ugly, deal with it

>>80751854
das racist

>>80751862
>point out there's more SAG black actors as a percent than in the general population
What in the fuck does any of this mean? It makes no sense. Do you need it explained to you why this is autistic?

Who tells you to sperg out about made up metrics that do nothing?

File: 12957192751172.png (1MB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x768px

>>80751795
This entire post doesn't make sense

Is this what you were trying to say or did you accidentally a few words?

>>80751909
Is your reading comprehension poor or something?

>>80751823
if you haven't figured it out by now, to these people diversity=more black people.
When they use terms like that they don't understand the meaning. For example, they misuse the term minority all the time. I've seen people talk about America being overrun with hispanics described as a "minority-majority country." Minority=brown skinned people to them.

>>80751856
>All white people are the same ethnicity
>All shades of white are the same ethnicity
>SJW believe this
Love this multiplayer game

>>80751904
Ok, so you are baiting.
I enjoyed the fake outrage bit, that had me going for 2 posts longer than I should have been

>>80751889
Proving their point, brainless.

>>80751927
Yeah, except I didn't say that.

>>80751443
Glory was never girlfriend of Peter.

>>80751767
This makes so much more sense and Im at peace now.

>>80751923
Not as poor as your typing obviously

>>80751944
You are just calling something bait so you can dismiss it. What are you literally saying? "more SAG black actors as a percent" is incomprehensibly retarded.

>>80750934
>diverse
>only one black actor
ugh. Go away, shitlord.

>>80751757

>mass effect Andromeda doesnt have the ability to be a white person

wait seriously? did all the white devils get wiped out in ME3?

>>80751964
How? I used complete sentences and articulated what I wanted. You may just be stupid?

File: image_21.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>80751987
You can stop now

>>80752003
But you didn't articulate it since it didn't make sense

>>80751924
Why does it bother you? Either make your own movie and cast whoever you want or just simply refuse tocbuy a ticket to their movies.

You faggots pick the dumbest things to get angry about. This is not even an issue. They are fictional fucking characters, their property owners can do whatever the hell they want with their IPs. You don't deserve a say.

>>80752040
Again, it's probably you. Why don't you use your big boy words and explain what you missed?

>>80751519
Suicide Squad doesn't count because they were too focused on Leto.

I'm black and i want die, i'm tired of this shit.

>>80752002
The only actually white characters are the default ones in the trailers. If you want to create a custom character, you can make a kind of white female, but you can't really make a white male.
That shouldn't be a main turn off though. People should have decided to never buy another Mass Effect after the disastrous ending of 3 as well as Bioware's reaction to the criticism. I knew from then on I'd never buy anything from Bioware again.

>>80752068
How can multiple groups be overrepresented

File: 1405002664830.png (97KB, 214x220px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 214x220px

>>80752002
>@tibermoon Is there any particular reason pale skin was excluded in CC. I hope you don't mind me inquiring.

>@tibermoon: Lead Designer on Mass Effect: Andromeda
>There are some limits to the tone range based on the texture of the actual scanned head. We're looking into fixing via patch.

>@tibermoon As in a day one patch? Or post release, if post is there a way to change your characters look post start?

>Definitely not day 1, that's already out. Potentially down the road as DLC. We're in early investigations now.

>>80752017
Can you do that math for me then you stupid faglord? Do you have a estimate? It doesn't make sense to correlate in the first place, since "disproportionate" implies there is a median line of "too many blacks" and "too little blacks" in fucking movies. And this...is proportional to how many SAG actors are black? Proportional to how many black people exist in the country? Are we only counting American film?

Of course...you still haven't explained why it even matters, since the whole thing is retarded to calculate in the first place. How do you even begin to factor for "too many" blacks? You comparatively need to factor for "too many whites" as a measure to contrast with that.

The autism is too great...this all hurts my brain.

>>80752141
>Lead Designer on Mass Effect: Andromeda
Is that the one that's a cosplayer, who most likely got her job based on her dick sucking skills?

>>80750907
>blessed

How delusional do you have to be to considered yourself blessed when hollywood panders to your demographic?

File: 1361341697540.png (224KB, 776x377px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 776x377px

>>80752175
Nope. Thats the head animator.
And basically how the entire studio got staffed.

>EA needs to grab the LBGTBBQHGSBSM community
>LETS HAVE A DIVERSITY HIRING DRIVE
>entire studio is nothing but blacks, indians and women.
>Most of whome have never done a game before, some of who have never done their jobs before (one of the animators was a debug coder, and hadnt done that in over 5 years and had never animated before and was shocked she got hired (her own words too))

>>80752175
That was the one that claimed to be lead facial animator.

>>80752103
I don't understand your question in context to what I wrote here:
>>80751795

What are you asking me? That other anon's logic, when reversed to talk about whites, would have to conclude that whites are "overrepresented" in media based on their population, skin color and (numbers of movies, I guess?) the whole thing is dumb to do. It's a pointless strawman.

File: 1428281209425.jpg (84KB, 700x714px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 700x714px

>>80750907
>diverse
>only niggers

>>80751856
I'm Australian, not American, and different skin tones aren't indicative of different ethnicities. Those four are all of African descent.

>>80752044
Different anon but it doesn't bother me, using the wrong word bothers me.
I'm annoyed at the misuse of language, not for any political reason.

>>80752319
The point was that you are just saying they "look like" African descent. My whole point was that not all blacks, not all darjer skinned people, not all shades of people, all live or come from fucking Africa.

>>80752353
It literally is the word diversity though. Idk how it is a misuse of a word just because you say so. Seems like you want to assume it is only diversity of blacks.

>>80751561
Nothing. In the end it still means nigger.

>2017
>every movie/tv/ad is a twitter gets offended episode
what a time to be alive

>>80752420
You mean
>every thread on /tv/ is faggots getting offended by twitter episode

>>80751856
Niggers a nigger no matter what you call it.

>>80752365
Ethnicity is not nationality, friend.
I'm merely pointing out that if there are four people shown in a picture, and all four are black, whether or not they are "different shades of black", it's silly to say "this is a diverse cast".

It's just as silly as if I were to announce my new television show starring Ryan Gosling, Colin Farrell, Melissa Macarthy and Tina Fey and then say how proud I am of how diverse my cast is, because they all have slightly different shades of white skin and different coloured hair/eyes.

That's not diversity. That's four white people. And the bottom-right image in the OP is four black people. Nothing wrong with it, think it'd be stupid if there were white people in there, but diversity is the wrong word.

>>80752463
You feel like you contributed with that post?

Bunch of snowflakes in this thread baka

>>80752471
>Ethnicity is not nationality, friend.
Right, and nobody said that. As African is not a nationality...

>>80752486
Yes. Did it trigger you?

>>80752511
Yes, but you're implying that the location of one's birth determines their ethnicity, and, while there is some correlation to that effect, it is not definitive.
I am aware that Africa is a continent.

>>80752528
No? Do you just waste time talking about niggers to get people angry?
>teehee I am only pretending to be retarded

What a life.

>>80751989
i forgot hispanics are white now

>>80751854
So rather than get the existing companies to make them more diverse in who they hire, they make a company that purposefully excludes whites. Why does this feel more regressive than progressive?

>>80751946
Got nothing to do with race. Look at that slack jaw on the first girl. You'd think she was part of some incestuous royal bloodline.

>diversify spiderman.
>bring the most ugly kids you can find.

Wew lads.

>>80752545
Are you a retard or something?

>>80752610
Please, enlighten me on how anything I said makes me retarded.

>>80752603
They did that with sw 7 too

>>80751854
>who challenge the fashion industry's bias towards Caucasian looks
>two of them have dyed their hair a lighter colour to colours pretty much only found in white people

>>80750907
>The white guy is still the main character besides black panther

Kek good job guys you really did it

>>80751501
>Hulu
Who is even using this?

>blessed
Yes I'm sure the graceful creator, godking of the universe decided to send some fast food entertainment for your eyeballs.

>>80752165
Yeah this is bait

>>80751096
WE

>>80752786
It wasn't, holy fuck you can't answer it can you? Of course not. /pol/ didn't inform you how. At this point you already ran away

>>80752787
WUZ

>>80750907
Reminder that only black people count when you count diversity, so two of those shows are shitty white male power fantasy bullshit with only 20% diversity, while one of them is an 100% diversity YASSS QUEEN SLAAAAYY YYY

>>80751854
The Leftovers™

File: tmp_28782-Hwndu_b6562e_616230616082008.jpg (36KB, 430x430px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 430x430px

>Power Rangers - always diverse (although the colours of the suits were a bit unsubtle to begin with)
>BLACKED Panther - set in Africa, all black leading cast including the villain which is a surprise. The one I'm most hype to see, but not diverse.
Spiderman - set in NYC so the diverse cast makes complete sense. Manhattan's real life superheroes are a brown and pink rainbow (pic related)

>>80751393

>anon is such a libtard faggot, he can't even imitate the average /pol/ autist without resorting back to his twitter literally shaking meme

We don't need you.

>>80750907
suicide squad isnt even a year old and that was the most diverse superhero film i've ever seen

>superhero movies
>blessed

>>80751854
Proof that what they mean by diversity is non-white

>>80750907
>bottom right pic
Blacktastic Four?

>>80752991
>everyone who doesn't 100 percent align with my cartoonishly far-right beliefs, must be my liberal boogeywoogey
YOU ARE RIGHT, I AM LITERALLY SHAKING!! NIGGERS ARE IN MY CAPESHIT OMFG WHAT DO TO NOT SHAKE??

>>80752847
>"we can't truly say we need more of this race actors"
>but yeah, we need more black actors
>I'm not a baiting faggot

>>80753113
It's like this conversation is whatever you pretend it is. Your first sentiment still makes no fucking sense.

>>80753106
You just kept this thread saved and responded back to a post within 5 minutes of your post from an hour ago
Must be a very relaxing morning

>>80753113
>"we can't truly say we need more of this race actors"
Anon, this makes no sense.

>>80753136
What are you rambling about now, baitpai

>>80753153
I didn't say it, it's essentially what was said by xir

>>80751854
It's cute how hard they are trying to look white.

>>80753152
>an hour ago
I didn't realize you were a time-traveler. Honestly, this whole thread should have been pruned hours ago.

File: tmp_6339-Could_the_new_Doctor_Who_companion_Bill_be_from_the_1980s_1986196405.jpg (30KB, 620x374px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 620x374px

>>80753049

Is ugliness a bonus? I could walk up any high street and pick a better looking selection. The BBC are particularly bad. It's almost like your chances of getting a role increase based on how hard you find it to close your lips over your teeth.

>>80753175
Why?

>>80753179
Or they are good actors?

File: LoL!.jpg (32KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x800px

How the hell is that supposed to be diverse?
Where are Asians? Mixed people?
Why is it only diverse when it's blacks only??!

>>80753186
>television and film
Is why.

>>80753195
If that was the case they wouldn't be requiring human resources departments to prioritize them

>>80753231
Are we talking about the BBC? The fuck does any of this mean?

>>80753255
Yes, that was the post you are responding to so it would make sense.

>>80751360
> Because one skin color is the norm in American cinema...the others aren't. You would act all giddy if it was 100 years of black actors and then, all of a sudden in your lifetime, there were a handful of whites.
No because i'm not autistic.
Now go back to redd!t faggot

>>80753280
>REBBIT REBBIT REBBIT

>>80753195

The problem is they quite glaringly aren't. There's plenty of black actors I enjoy. I don't even mind race swapping in fictional situations. But when you're confronted with a diversity hire with a thick South London accent in a historical piece, you have to wonder.

>>80753305
Do you plan on doing many productive things today?

>>80753329
I don't occupy space in my brain to care about which fictional characters are black or not.

>>80753329
>historical piece
They travel through time..

>>80751561

One is raciss.

And yes that's as stupid as it sounds.

>>80751096
Memes transcend time and space as we know it.

File: s.jpg (27KB, 508x524px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 508x524px

>this one samefag that's posted like 20 times

>>80751338
Better call 1911

>>80753455
>being so assmad over blacks in capeshit that you have to defend your autistic /pol/ bait 20 different times instead of just leaving.
>being this mad

>>80751854
90% of them are ugly as sin

non-whites are you even trying?

>>80753534
i take it you are who he is talking about?

File: 1489043612271.jpg (38KB, 360x396px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 360x396px

>Movies now have 'diverse' casts, females and people of colour all forced into CEO roles in businesses and films

>Blacks still commiting most crimes, women still whining about not being respected enough

How much more do they want?

>>80753731
Crashing American Industry, with no survivors!!

Balkanized America now!

>>80751854
so basically "Caucasian looks" = being attractive

>>80751198
I can't believe they let fucking dogs browse 4chan

>>80751947
You said literally the same changing white for black, therefore the same should apply to white.

>>80753532
heh

>>80751400
Keep telling yourself that. I'm not reading about any character that has his whiteness erased, same as I'm not bothering going to see the new Thor film because they yet again shit all over my European heritage with the absurd casting of Valkyrie. If that's how much they respect our culture, they can take their products and fuck off.

>>80753207
Because if they don't appease the blacks they start burning and looting shit, chimp out and maybe you'll get some of the diversity pie

>>80751823
Because diversity simply means fewer white people in their own culture. It's a racist's way of making population replacement and soft genocide seem benign.

>For the 3rd time in a row they make a study about the "earn gap" in my country
>For the 3rd time not only the difference is like 1% but also it goes on favour of women, yeah, they earn 1% more than men because in 500.000 companies only 400 had different salaries (keepeing all variables the same except sex) and turns out it's women who earn more than men in those
>They still complain about women earning less in my country on the international women's Day
Women were a mistake

File: blackman.jpg (31KB, 535x341px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 535x341px

Old news.

>A Black, an Asian, a Latina, a Native American
>Two homosexuals, a bi, someone with autism
Power Rangers 2017 was a mistake

>>80751259
No, it literally isn't. Having criticisms over nonsensical artistic choices, that are clearly political in nature has nothing to do with autism. By your cynical 4chan faggot logic any observation about anything ever is autism. Don't feel an emotional response to anything either, that's autism.

>>80754840
Difference between expressing an opinion and constantly making threads about fictional characters and how assmad you get that they are black. Look at how pathetic this thread is. How fucking degenerate are you where you even have an "emotional response" about the race of a fictional character to begin with? Do you cry when they change eye color and height too?

People like you have their own separate problems with minorities and project those issues onto shit that doesn't matter, so you can have something to be angry at.

>>80754164
I think you missed the point.

>>80750907
...paid for by white people.

>>80754217
>t. white nationalist who blogs about the white genocide

>>80754217
You sound petty as fuck

>>80751614
>Yeah, that isn't a real thing in adult conversation.

What the fuck are you talking about? You sound like a 5 IQ nigger. You don't HAVE a point and when what you say is countered you start drawing lines in the sand about what's adult and what isn't and who says what and when. You are fucking dumb.

>>80751519

>suicide squad
>heroes

File: 1439152749163.png (164KB, 409x325px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 409x325px

>>80751854
the only thing i wish when it comes to this diversity bullshit would be to see more middle eastern models in adverts

fuck me they are beautiful when they're beautiful. especially women from libya for example

>>80754840
>rage over the race of fictional characters
>is a rational emotional response
>>>/pol/

File: xMjEe7i_coygg_ypm4TKYerLqnpUktuehFsBA1xDj1M.jpg (76KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 768x768px

>reminder

>>80752236
Until 40 years ago, whites were 90% of the population of the USA. I think you're having trouble understanding the concept of proportionate and disproportionate. Blacks are 12% of the US population and if you were to go by media, you would think you were fucking Nigeria. That's what people are saying when they talk about this. There is clearly an ulterior motive to display a minority population and a minority culture over the dominant, majority culture. You haven't even bothered to explain why this "makes no sense" (because it does) and how it's "backwards" other than flipping the fuck out in indignation, equating it to /pol/ when it's actually just common sense and pulling the "Heh, ADULTS don't talk like this, kid" intellectual checkmate stance.

>>80755071
99% of the time, it's liberals raging over the race of fictional characters though.

>>80755024
But it wasn't countered by anything and yes, I do have a point.
>when in doubt, call them a nigger
Great argument. Let me know when that "counter" shows up.

Why does this site attract such retards?

File: 20160123_woc197.png (76KB, 1190x756px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1190x756px

>>80752847

Anon, what "disproportionately represented" means, is that there's a higher percentage of blacks represented than there is in the population. It's like when black Twitter was complaining about how the Grammys are super white, and Beyonce was robbed because white people like Beck always win Album of the Year. It's a weird case to make, because blacks are 13% of the population and have won significantly more than 13% of Album of the Year awards.

If you look at black representation in the industry, blacks are more than 13% of SAG actors; black actors fill more than 13% of film roles; and blacks have won more than 13% of Oscars. Whites and blacks are both overrepresented in film, meaning that the film industry doesn't reflect our society; it shows an America that is whiter and blacker than it actually is, with barely any Asian people. It also shows that, like, 1/3 people are Jewish, but that's not the point right now.

>http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2016/01/film-and-race

>>80755117
It just doesn't matter. It is quite literally a strawman argument. How many white movies are too little or too much "white film"? It's autistic as all shit as a line of thinking. And the greater question, who cares? Who cares how many blacks you think are or are not in films?

None of this has any substance or even offers anything important as a point. Your "ulterior motive" bullshit is just you being a triggered idiot.

It is frustrating trying to explain the difference between a real issue and one in your own head. You should be able to use your own brain and not be this malleable to bullshit.

Next you are going to tell me about white genocide or some other dumb thing.

>>80755112
Who the fuck are they?

>>80755166
But none of this actually fucking matters...

>>80755272
You can't say this and in the next breath say you want more black bulls in your superhero movies.
It's one or the other.

>>80755166
>this retarded math
I really wish you could talk to a statistician about "da representation in muh flicks", just so he can laugh at the premise.

File: 16801423854071.jpg (191KB, 993x962px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 993x962px

>>80755117
>Until 200 some odd years ago, reds were 90% of the population of the USA.

>>80755337
Point to where I said both, neet.

>>80755282
Desi-Kenyan Feminist/ She/Her/Bi

>>80755352
Yeah, and you don't see us complaining about all their old moves having natives on it.

>>80755341
Let's hear your input on it.
You can write, you just wrote that. Please anon, do tell

>>80755288
So what are you bitching over?

>>80754217
>same as I'm not bothering going to see the new Thor film because they yet again shit all over my European heritage with the absurd casting of Valkyrie.

I'm literally a neo-nazi and I'm not even this autistic.

>>80755272
>liberals continuously bitch and moan about lack of diversity i.e. not enough black people and MAKE it an issue
>"actually, if you look at the data, blacks are overrepresented in Hollywood, not underrepresented"
>"W-who cares? This totally isn't a real issue, next you're gonna tell me about white genocide or something!!"

kek, if only people like you had the bare minimum of self-awareness to realize how absurdly hypocritical and stupid you are.

>>80755365
Here >>80751360

Damn, 3 hours anon? Damn...

>>80752072
>too focused on Leto
One of the reasons the movie got shit on was that there was too little screentime for Joker

What's sad is what companies are creating, see Marvel, twice already they got a backlash from the public the were spoiling

>>80755388
>So what are you bitching over?
Because you reactionary faggots keep bringing up this "overrepresenting" meme as if it means anything objective or meaningful. You only mention it to push your /pol/-tier, race-baiting agenda. I don't even think you read the article you fucking sourced. You get past the first paragraph even? You are juat as bad as SJWs on the far left, getting so pissy about blacks in movies, as if you personally fund them. Which you don't, not unless you choose to buy a ticket.

This is literally crying to cry. It's like someone is telling you to start shaking your fists at black boogeymen. FICTIONAL CHARACTERS ANON

>>80755495
You seem to be the most irritated here actually.
Also not quite getting the whole >none of this matters but I've been monitoring this thread for hours but it's totally meaningless thing you got going on

>>80750907
So progressive to use diverse casts in 3 movies people were going to see anyway. If diversity really worked so great, the black Johnny Storm would have made Fantastic Four successful. But SJWs will point to the success of Spider-Man, Black Panther, and Power Rangers (at least opening weekend box office for that one) as solely due to the black people in the movie.

>>80755420
But it isn't a real issue and you are (as usual) extrapolating the data to mean things that it doesn't.

How is this entire display not being hypocritical?
>only hypocritical when the left does it
>whole thread complaining about black fictional characters
>MUH OVERREPRESENTARION LOOK AT THE """DATA""" (WHICH DOESN'T ACTUALLY MEAN ANYTHING) SEE???
>FICTIONAL CHARACTERS ARE BLACK REEEE
>y-you lack self awareness
Neck yourself.

Just as bad as SJWs.

File: 1443906763563.jpg (76KB, 800x804px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 800x804px

>>80755589
>this level of rageposting
Holy shit

>>80755495
No one is getting pissy about blacks in movies you fucking moron. Blacks have been in movies since before any of us were born. People rightfully get pissy about blackwashing and forced overrepresentation.

>>80755540
It doesn't matter because 1. Who gives a fuck how many blacks are in movies? Are you implying that there is a limit to how many can be in movies? 2. Even if blacks were overrepresented in film (implying this matters in any meaningful way) what does it actually MEAN to say that? What does it entail?

Honestly, why would it matter in any concrete sense? Hundreds of thousands of films, are you going to go count how many have blacks in them?

>>80755589
What's wrong with the data again?
You've mentioned it a few times.

Surely you can tell us, I mean you've spent a long time here saying nothing, you might as well take a chance to BTFO of me while you can

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-22 at 7.21.04 AM.png (2MB, 1222x722px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1222x722px

>>80755288

Not if you're black apparently. I assume you're looking for representation in line with what you find if you search for stock images of cheerful business people: whites, blacks, and occasionally something else. But keep on complaining about how #OscarsSoWhite because blacks aren't nominated for top acting honors while Latinos, who actually are seriously underrepresented, are finally starting to consistently win top awards.

>>80755659
Again, overrepresentation is a retardo meme and you are talking about fictional characters being race-bent.

How you don't realize why this is an aspie complaint is baffling.

File: jeb_in_hoodie.jpg (29KB, 400x428px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x428px

>>80755667
>"WE NEED MORE BLACK BULLS ON MY COMIC BOOK MOVIES"
>well actually blacks are overrepresented in the media by-
>"Ughh what does it even matter? The data is wrong, it doesn't make a difference"
Top fucking kek

>>80755693
I'm not sure if you're trolling or if you're legitimately retarded. YOUR SIDE is making a big deal out of fictional characters being too white. You can't just turn around and go "hurr arguing over the race of fictional characters is stoopid!" if this whole argument exists only because YOU continue to push the narrative that there are too many fictional white characters and not enough fictional black characters.

File: 1433803958186.jpg (1MB, 3736x3464px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3736x3464px

>>80755693
>overrepresentation is a retarded meme
>but whites are overrepresented in movies

>>80755673
>What's wrong with the data again?
Despite you not reading your own article that said "blacks are represented evenly for their population percentage", even if they didn't, you are asserting that this is a thing that objectively matters in some real way. You then have to go full autist and explain to me what "too many black" films are, or "too few white" films are.

Which is a mind-numbingly retarded thought process. Why do you CARE if blacks were overrepresented in film? You don't make these movies, you don't own stock in their companies, you don't control any level of the private movie making process.

It is just crying, because you have problems with blacks.

>>80755778
Why do you care if whites are overrepresented in movies than?
Apply your logic to a different race.

I agree with the dude who says this is meaningless, because it's, because at the end of the day we're going to be annihilated by Islamists like Europe

>>80755730
Again, I never said both of these things.

>>80755801
For the fifth goddamn time, I never said that.

>>80755808
No, you're just sitting in a thread in the middle of the morning and have been for 3 hours because you are so indifferent

>>80755778
>Why do you CARE if blacks were overrepresented in film?

Maybe they don't like canonical white characters being blackwashed, all justified by the false narrative that blacks are underrepresented?

>>80751360

But there have been tons of black film stars and black actors in general for fucking decades now

>>80755833
Pretending to be a fence-sitter is kinda difficult when you are only ever arguing against one side and wouldn't be caught dead saying a word against the other, which coincidentally is the root of the problem.

File: 1314234508031.jpg (39KB, 465x382px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 465x382px

>oh boi! diversify me captain

Okay which one of these brown nigs are gay,transgendered and identify as a asian long-horned beetle?

>>80755763
>YOUR SIDE is making a big deal out of fictional characters being too white.
What a faggot you are, I don't speak for anyone else. I have no clue what my "side" is. Deal with the argument presented, or fuck off. I didn't make this thread to complain about a boogeywoogey.
>You can't just turn around and go "hurr arguing over the race of fictional characters is stoopid!" if this whole argument exists only because YOU continue to push the narrative that there are too many fictional white characters and not enough fictional black characters.
I am going to try and explain this to you as plain as I can: you do not OWN these fictional characters. If I owned Wonder Woman as an IP, I can make her a fucking blind, trans Muslim from Mars if I wanted to and you can do nothing about it. She is a FICTIONAL CHARACTER, there is no real Wonder Woman that exists that we need to adhere a strict adaptation from. Who gives an absolute flying fuck if some people think there arw too many white comic book characters? How does that rustle your jimmies so much? Maybe in some case by case examples, that is true. Who cares? I sure as shit don't. The characters are fictional and I don't own them.

I'm not making bi-weekly bait threads about the motherfucking skin pigmentation of a capeshit character, or some dumb tweet a SJW made once, or a blog post from a literal who. The only reason you do this song and dance, is as a cover for your shitty /pol/ beliefs. No normal or chemically balanced individual sits at home on a weekday and concerns himself with the race of fictional characters, just to get mad and pretend there is a white genocide.

Get over it.

>>80754217
>muh heritage
>implying it isn't already bastardized in the original comics already
Not even /pol/ is this autistic.

>>80755999
I don't understand what any of this meant

>>80755667

Apparently you do, and apparently the girl in the OP pic does.

I think the people crying for more black representation have the responsibility to define what enough black representation is, because apparently having blacks represented at or just above their percentage of the population isn't even close.

Honestly, I think that this is a combination of two things. For most of American history, it's been white people and black people, and blacks have been generally at around 10-13% of the population for 100 years. Up until quite recently, the only real options for diversity was black people, so "diverse" meant white and black. Society has changed, though. We have a significantly smaller percentage of white people, black people have generally stayed the same, and we have a higher and higher percentage of Latinos, Asians, etc. Blacks hear that whites are becoming a minority, and they genuinely think that that means that blacks are starting to take over. As America is becoming more diverse, they think that our media should become more diverse to reflect that, therefore a more diverse America is a blacker America. They understand that white representation should be going down, but they haven't realized that all those white actors should be replaced by Latinos not blacks if we're really going for equal representation.

How many top Asian actors can you name? How many Oscar-winning Asians can you name? What's the Hispanic equivalent to Luke Cage or Black Panther? Lois Lane and Supergirl both work with black guys, but the America they live in seems to have missed out on the Latino migration over the last few decades.

>>80755896
What is a false narrative in the context of fiction? Please, enlighten me in what you think this buzzword even means in this instance.

>>80751523
Niggas lovvvvveee animuu

Can confirm this;

Ask a random nigga about naruto

>>80755769
Yeah, I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself in how I never said both of those things.

>>80756048
>I don't have a side, I don't care
>I've just blogposted for hours on end ITT

Holy kek, and to try to come across as the better here
Emfuckingbarassing

>>80756173
I never said I don't have an opinion or "side", I am merwly correcting you on what I did and did not claim to say.
>not being embarrassed for regurgitating /pol/ talking points

>>80756155
You've rageposted for hours now you pathetic faggot.

>>80756218
*merely

>>80750907
Can someone please explain to me why the endgame of SJWs seems to just be getting pandered to with disposable corporate media? They're not winning here, they're just customers.

>>80756218
You said you didn't have a side here >>80756048 7 minutes ago

>>80752588
And Asians
And I think the blue ranger was gay

File: 1490060652786.jpg (27KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 750x750px

>>80756220
>when I shitpost about the race of fictional characters, every day, thread after thread, it is noteworthy and in defense of the white race!
>(is called retarded)
>WELL YOU ARE JUST A SAD FAGGOT HAHAHA LOOK AT YOU SHITPOSTING FOR HOURS
>(proceeds to shitpost about how triggered fictional blacks make him)
I mean honestly, you people are beyond self-awareness at this point.

>>80756282
I said I don't speak for anyone but myself and don't know what you even imply with a "side". Can you read?

>>80754925
What if they just want it true to the source like any fan of something would and not needlessly altered for whiney retards? Hang yourself

>>80756422
But you are literally whining about it...now...

This post is a whine.

>this nignog

Coon lives don't matter desu

>>80756454
I'm not and I can just relate to fans of a series? I reiterate you should hang yourself

>>80756454
What does that make you? Whining x20?

>>80756282
Is struggling to keep his own autism straight

>>80756503
>I should hang myself
>If I don't produce literal outrage
>over fictional characters turning black
Give me one example of a racebend or genderbend, where they then proceeded to actually destroy all the original comics of that character.

SPIDERMAN SHOULD BE A BIG BLACK BULL

>>80756519
Telling you that I find you retarded isn't some meta-whine. When did this meme of "if you call me out, you are equally (A)" come from? Fuck, it's autistic.

This faggots just going to keep shitposting "how he doesnt care" until everybody goes to work

>>80756616
YOU'VE
BEEN
HERE
FOR
FUCKING
HOURS

>>80756645
>implying /pol/fags have self-awareness not to shake and screech around this board
>implying anyone who is posting here has a real job outside of ushering at a movie theater

>>80756576
>implying I care about this
>implying I'll cite anything for a retard

Fans of a series are allowed to be mad when something diverges from the source for any reason, especially to appeal to faggots begging diversity, hang yourself

>>80756676
>4chan is one person

>>80756744
No but you are.

>>80751400

>Comics in general have been selling less than before, yes, but that has nothing to do with force diversity and everything to do with piracy and internet.

Delusion.

>>80756715
Then stop giving them money, or just stop complaining since your opinion doesn't mean that much to begin with
>hang yourself hang yourself hang
>did I mention hang yourself?
>"""arguments"""
>PLEASE TAKE MY SCREECHING ON CAPESHIT SERIOUSLY REEEEE JANG YOURSELF

>>80756835
But nig twitter screeching is better how?

>>80756764
Then stop posting and realize that if you want to bitch about minorities, you can do that here:
>>>/pol/

But you are a special kind of neet, one who complains about blacks and capeshit! A unique kind of degenerate I want off this fucking board.

>>80756880
You can just not go to their twitter accounts...

File: 1470469138358.jpg (133KB, 960x825px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 960x825px

>claim to be all about "diversity"
>when they're all actually racist as fuck against whites

>>80756923
And you could leave 4chan

>>80756897
And here you are replying to every post you can.

>>80757006
>leave 4chan
No, I'm on the appropriate board. Why don't you go back to yours, faggot? Nobody gives a shit that you don't like blacks.

>>80754217
Don't listen to the shills. Its obvious that the jews are gonna burn the house down while screaming about white racists. Just enjoy the ride.

>>80757081
>ITS DA JOOOS!!!

>>80751386
They have no restraint.

>ask someone what the benefit of diversity is
>they can't come up with anything so they just resort to calling me racist

>>80757187
>literally has never happened to anon.

>>80755112
>Witt

>>80755071
>>80756897
>If I tell them to go away to the boogeyman board of /pol/ surely they'll leave!
Are you fucking 10?

>>80757550
Just new

>>80756835
>Implying I give them money
>complaining
>Implying this is an opinion a d not fact that changing the source for no reason is stupid

You are really that confused aren't you? Poor boy can't even tie the noose

>>80751501
>>80751393
>>80752991
>>80751302
>when you make yourself look like a bigger cancer to the board than the people you're mocking

>>80756947
this.

>>80752432
Actually it's being bothered by forced diversity which is an objective flaw since it diminishes the value of something and makes it look more like a company-molded product for the sake of sales rather than something fresh and unbiased.

File: Burger King Kids Club.png (147KB, 300x262px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 300x262px

>IT'S DIVERSE, THAT MEANS IT'S INHERENTLY GOOD AND NOT FORCED CORPORATE PANDERING AT ALL!!!!

Why are liberals so stupid and easy to control?

>>80754991
>>80755019
>>80755397
>>80756061
>>80757133
can't tell if it's >>80754217 replying to himself or you all have aspergers and can't tell it's a bait post.

>>80757550
>say /pol/fag arguments
>woah, that's just a boogeyman teehee

>>80755778
But people are complaining about blackwashing, forced diversity, i.e things that make a product look sterile, artificial, dishonest.

>>80756048
>you do not OWN these fictional characters. If I owned Wonder Woman as an IP, I can make her a fucking blind, trans Muslim from Mars if I wanted to and you can do nothing about it.
Obviously, but people have a right to say they don't like it because of the original status of the character. It's like when Captain America turned out to be a Hydra agent and the entire comic book community went apeshit because it betrayed the original character's personality that had existed for decades.

>>80757942
>"forced" diversity
>independent, private film industry
>not government sponsored
>not government funded
>anons can simply not freely participate in the products
>burgerland still filled with angry neets
>CHOOSING to get upset

>>80757973
I sort of liked that, anon. Fans are going to yell about shit no matter what. That is how fandoms work. They aren't rational. Neither are these arguments in this thread.

>>80757908
what?

Are you saying /pol/ isn't being used as a boogeyman? Are you saying nobody could possibly disagree with you like this unless they're from the eeeevil board of /pol/?

Don't kid yourself, claiming something comes from /pol/ is trying to discard any validity they may have because that board is known to be about loonies. It's like calling any gun supporter a redneck.

>>80757774
>when in doubt, blame liberals

>>80758083
You are a loonie if your argument is legit "I am upset that a fictional character is black now, this is an attack on white culture, (insert something about niggers and violence and them being subhuman here) it is disproportionate!!!"
^ALL of which,has been said in this thread. None of those points are very logical and I guarantee you that a handful of these faggots itt are from /pol/. I mean, how new are you if you can't ecen recognize that this is a bait thread to begin with?

>>80758014
>>"forced" diversity
Yes, making a cast all happen to be diverse feels forced and makes the product not look genuine, rather tailored to please audiences as much as possible. Nobody has a problem with Black Panther or Blade being black because they were black originally.
>choosing to get upset
It's called expressing your opinion, bub, that's what this board is about. Not sure why are you against that.

>>80758174
Oh because /pol/ invented these notions right? NOBODY could possibly dislike the fact that companies are forcibly diversifying casts for the sake of lowest common denominator which people feel hurt the product by making it look safe and sterile?

You are as bad as the people you're using as a boogeyman. The same way people blame reddit or tumblr or whatever for everything, you're convinced that people with dissenting opinions HAVE to be from that board, because doing so will discard any validity those arguments have and you will be at rest. You don't have to worry about others not agreeing with you, they're from /pol/!

>>80758185
>looks at all the crying and false flagging in this thread
>"expressing opinions"
Righto, I guess I'll see ya tomorrow...wonder what bait thread you will post? Oh, maybe a twitter screencap? Oh! Maybe something about Hidden Figures! I can't wait to be surprised!

See ya then faglord!

>>80758174
4 (four) hours

>>80758174

The argument is that companies are injecting diversity into material that did not have it previously for the sole reason of 'muh diversity' and pandering to a larger market which takes away from the merit of the work because it has now been derailed from the source for no reason whatsoever, and you are just making a strawman argument otherwise because you are a fucking retard

>>80758272
>"expressing opinions"
Yes, honey, I like how you're pretending like anyone that disagreed with you must have been ''crying and falseflagging''. That totally doesn't make you look biased at all.
>Righto, I guess I'll see ya tomorrow...wonder what bait thread you will post? Oh, maybe a twitter screencap? Oh! Maybe something about Hidden Figures! I can't wait to be surprised!
This post doesn't help you you know? It makes you look like a child.

>>80758257
Yeah, most people don't actually go into a rage about diversity at all.
>if you call me retarded, it's really you trying to censor dissenting opinion!
What a fucking gymnastic there weeew! Sure looks like you conveniently thought of all sorts of dodges to avoid that your opinion is just silly.

Maybe anon, just maybe, it is aspie as all shit to care that films are diverse? How can someone actually feel that threatened by something they are so removed from? You are just parroting surface level answers you picked up from some othwr dumb faggot just as reactionary as you.
>B-BUT DIVERSITY RUINS DA PRODUCT
this literally makes no marketing sense. I want to sell something to the most people, I am going to pander to blacks and whites. How does this possibly threaten you to this degree where you need to post about it?

Yes, you are from /pol/. That board was a mistake.

I legitimately wish I never had to see a nigger on my life

Would be top comfy

>>80758331
Your entire complaint is a strawman, genius. You are complaining that companies are pandering to anyone that isn't you. You act like pandering is illegal or wrong. Don't buy the product if a black being on your box of tendies makes you go into a rage. This is not a real complaint. It never has been

>>80758383
You sure showed me. Can't wait to see your ebin macros tomorrow that really stick it to dem libshits! Maybe we can bait someone into talking about cultural marxism! Or muh forced diversity and how that leads to the white genocide!

Maybe some Breitbart links or some vague mentions of Wikileaks, then call it "spoonfeeding" to source anything and run away. How fun

>>80758456

>People complaining about lack of diversity in things isn't real

>Companies adapting to better attract those people isn't real

>Lack of diversity in old material isn't real

>Companies adapting that old material, and now injecting 'diversity' that wasn't there in the old material to better appeal to said people complaing about lack of diversity isn't real

>People being upset about adaptions detracting away from the original source aren't real

you do see how fucking retarded you are now, right? feel better bud

>>80758542
Yes, you faggots being upset at diversity and pretending it is an issue are real. I agree.

>>80758608

my mistake friend, I now see I had mistaken your bait for genuine idiocy

>>80758413
>Yeah, most people don't actually go into a rage about diversity at all.
Yeah the ones opposing you are the ones that went into a rage, that'll make em look bad and you seem calm.

>What a fucking gymnastic there weeew!
It's not though, it's why you're so desperate to pretend like the opposition is from /pol/. If that board never existed, who would you be using as a boogeyman? Stormfront? Anything to make the opposition look like loonies?
>Maybe anon, just maybe, it is aspie as all shit to care that films are diverse?
I just explained to you how forced diversity makes a product feel safe and fake, especially if it's changing a previously established character for the sake of it. You may not share that opinion, but that's no reason to claim anyone that disagrees with you must be from /pol/.
> I want to sell something to the most people, I am going to pander to blacks and whites
Did you just say that shameless race pandering isn't a bad thing?
> How does this possibly threaten you
See above, this hurts the product in people's eyes. This isn't about ''threatening'' me.
>Yes, you are from /pol/. That board was a mistake.
There you go again, pretending like the opposition is from the boogeyman board, you are a hypocrite because you are acting as bad as the people you're mocking.

Also, bubsy, if that board didn't exist then you'd have even MORE of those dastardly /pol/ people around here, because it's a containment board, use your head.

>>80758631
At least I don't invent things to be outraged about to hide my issues with blacks.

>>80758533
>how dare you disagree with me, you must share these retarded notions that make your opinion's validity disappear even though I have no proof of it whatsoever!
You're as bad as /pol/.

>>80758657
>Yeah the ones opposing you are the ones that went into a rage
Are you new here?
>Anything to make the opposition look like loonies?
You do a good enough job with how shitty your arguments are. I like how you are playing the victim card, after 1/3rd of this thread being a straight up bitch fest about blacks this and blacks that waahhh wahhh "you just no likey my opinion, b-but my opinion is valid because I say so. Stop it meanie! I just wanted to yell about niggers!"
>I just explained to you how forced diversity makes a product feel safe and fake, especially if it's changing a previously established character for the sake of it.
always vague enough to plop this argument anywhere you don't like blacks being portrayed as functioning human people. It never gets applied to whitewashing, then it is just a "liberal buzzword". Yet companies want to sell to the most people, who gives a literal shir if they pander to minorities to do that? How do YOU suffer?
>Did you just say that shameless race pandering isn't a bad thing?
Nothing wrong with a free market selling products to races that buy them. Do you dislike capitalism now? You seem so, if you want "something" to prevent "muh forced diversity" from altering your sacred capeshit you have no financial stock in at all, or ownership of.
>See above, this hurts the product in people's eyes.
Eh, you are a small fringe group. Majority of Americans are fine with it.
>you are a hypocrite because you are acting as bad as the people you're mocking.
If that is the bullshit equivolence fallacy you need to justify how pitiful your arguments are, sure.

>>80758699
>NIGGERS NIGGERA NIGGERS DONT MAKE MY CAPESHIT BLACK OMG IT IS FORCED DIVERSITY
>"this is retarded"
>well, you are just as bad as me.

Remember you don't have to make an argument on your own merit if you can just screech about your opposition being racist

>>80758533
Funny thing is minorities themselves express disgust when companies try to pander to them in such a shameless manner. Companies think that making a hero suddenly female or black is going to make them more idolized, as if people are so shallow that they can only look up to heroes if they're the same sex and race.

This dates back to Captain Planet, way before, you know, /pol/.
>>80758915
>Are you new here?
No, why?
>You do a good enough job with how shitty your arguments are
But you didn't address any of them, you keep ignoring them and saying that it's ''aspie'' or ''you're from /pol/''.
>always vague enough to plop this argument anywhere you don't like blacks being portrayed as functioning human people
Strawman, never said that, nice try. In fact I said nobody has a problem with Blade or Black Panther, good job proving that you're not reading and are desperate to label me as ''that group'' to discard my validity.
>It never gets applied to whitewashing
AHAHAHAHA
How did you miss all the Ghost in the Shell movie threads?
>Nothing wrong with a free market selling products to races that buy them.
People dislike that, you're against people expressing that opinion for some reason.
>Eh, you are a small fringe group.
Nice job trying to dismiss an argument.
>If that is the bullshit equivolence fallacy you need to justify how pitiful your arguments are, sure.
Nice job not trying to counterargue that at all.
>>80758992
Strawman again, do I have to point you again to the fact that I said that nobody has a problem with Blade and Black Panther?

Seriously, you're a child, you are desperate to pretend like your opposition are just a bunch of racists who's valdity shouldn't count. You keep making strawmen arguments and ignoring posts whole to fit your point.

Again, the main point is forced diversity, especially the one that changes an established character to another.

>>80759031
>not a single person used the term racist
>despite posts like "I really wish I could never see a nigger again", "blackwashing!!", "forced diversity!", "no respect for white culture", "keep my capeshit white", "niggers arent attractive", "niggers are subhuman"
>totally not racist
Sure thing, buckaroonie.

>>80759084
>as if people are so shallow that they can only look up to heroes if they're the same sex and race.
Literally, this thread...

>>80759087
you're really keen on grouping everyone that disagreed with you in such manner like that, because then you can just discard their argument.

let's just ignore all the regular points like god forbid people disagree with you and don't like changing established characters. Hell for some reason you brought up the fact that companies can do it and there's nothing anyone can do about it as if that was part of the argument at all.
>>80759123
Uh, no? Do you see people complaining about Black Panther or Blade?