Are you guys okay with how much Hollywood Actors make? Do you think it's fair, even though thousands of hours and plenty of things go into making a movie that have NOTHING to do with the actors?
Do you think, what they endure, and go through makes the paycheck justified, or do you believe they are pricks, get paid to much, and do too little in the grand scheme of things?
Is that guy considered a "Chad"?
>>80750207
>it's an 'anon doesn't understand how value operates in a free market' episode
>>80750207
Learn to spell
I'd rather it go to a blond Chad heartthrob instead of a greasy evil kike in the producers room
I'm more okay with that than I am with the fact that people actually still go and see modern blockbusters.
They get paid cause people see the movies
Stop watching them if you don't like them to get paid as much
Same with sport
>>80750235
>>80750235
>>80750235
>>80750235
Here you go OP
>>80750232
think he's transcended chad
>>80750235
The floor is yours, greentexter who adds nothing to a thread.
>>80750303
>you are annoyed people enjoy things you do not.
Okay, but why? People always seem to say this as if there aren't plenty of movies that aren't big blockbusters that are of quality. But there's tons.
>>80750207
There's a lot I'm not okay with in the world, there's a lot I think is unfair. This ranks near the bottom of those things.
>>80750395
Well, the studios pay these actors that well because they believe that they add that much value to the production. It's not that their performance is tens of millions of dollars better than cheaper alternatives, but that a high profile actor adds millions in marketing value, helps to get punters in to the cinema, and attracts additional funding and investment to a project. If they didn't think that it was worth their while to spend that much money, then believe me they wouldn't. That's why the supporting cast in most films get SAG minimum even if they're pretty famous, because the big investment is in the lead actor and they don't need to double down on it.