How is the Sony 3000?

>>80742928
>>/lgbt/

>>80742928
Idk

>>80742928
Honestly don't know why they make those. Don't bother with it. Sony a51000 or a6000 if you need the VF. a6300 if you plan on recording in 4k at some point.

>>80742928
Why

>>80742928
>>>/p/gear

>>80743180
>if you plan on recording in 4k at some point
in which case you go ahead and get a Panasonic GH4, G85 or GH5 (or G7 if money is too tight)

Hey thats my camera.

It's a nice, cheap camera. Horrible interface, Pretty good at taking simple videos. Perfect for beginners a few years ago, but now I'd recommend a cannon 600d (t3i)

>>80743289
>those Pannies
>not the Sony a7S II

m4/3 is shit

It's pretty good on film.

>>80743322
>Horrible interface

like literally every sony product

>>80743443
The menu system now is worlds better than the NEX menus. It's just that the a3000 is designed like shit.

>>80743289
>micro 4/3

File: 1444029653247.jpg (40KB, 571x460px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 571x460px

>>80743330
>Comparing a $2700 camera to a $1200 camera
>M4/3 Shit

>>80743923
>m4/3
>not shit

you own stock in Olympus or somthing?

If Panny and Olympus started with apsc mirrorless from the start, they'd own the industry by now.

>>80742928
its a salty bitch

"micro 4/3 is bad" is just a /p/ meme. ignore it.

>>80744015
No I work as a photographer and commercial filmmaker and find great value in my GH4 and past M4/3 cameras. Likewise I also love Canon and Sony cameras. They're just tools for the job.