How historically accurate is this film?

Also if you say it isn't accurate, please cite your sources. Just saying so isn't evidence

>>80680962
So if it were accurate you wouldn't want sources? Fuck off biased cunt. There's a black lives matter protest for you to be at.

It's quite accurate. NASA experimented heavily with chimps.

Black Kings built the pyramids. Flying to the moon is child's play.

They used their genetic memory from when dey wuz on da moon to get us there again.

>>80681032
I provided my source in the OP: the film

File: 1372375970368.gif (3MB, 250x255px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 250x255px

>>80681090

blatant oscar bait by a film company desperate to win an award by cashing in on the blm vote

is it accuarate?
yes black people were involved in getting a man on the moon
were they important?
no more than the other thousands involved in the project

how about a film about the german rocket scientists who did half the sums involved in rocket trajectories that landed them on the moon?

no?
skipping over that part?
ok.

>>80681090
PFFFTTTHAHAHAHAHAHA

File: 1488906534060.png (801KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

801KB, 1600x900px

I cant resist this bait, sue me.

File: octavia-spencer-1-sized.jpg (19KB, 245x317px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 245x317px

>>80680940
Punchible face kino?

>>80681513
>/pol/ detected

You /pol/ leeches are insufferable.

Who cares is it historically accurate or not, the fact that it's a bad movie doesn't change if it's 100% historically accurate or not.
Allmost all filmmaking elements were executed sub par and no source or historical proof can change that.

>>80683945
>Not buying into libtard crap automatically makes you /pol/
How about you head to that blm protest with OP >>80681032 was talking about

>>80681090
op btfo

>>80684257
>not buying into libtard crap
No unironically using the phrase "libtard crap" to describe something you disagree with makes you /pol/

>>80682039
What the fuck. She isn't black at all. Am I being rused? How do they get away with this?

>>80684252

>an historical movie doesn't have to be historically accurate

what's next? a jeanne d'arc movie where she is transexual?

WE

>>80680940
Not even a little bit.

Harry Potter is probably more historically accurate.

>>80684743
WUZ

>>80684710
Well yes this piece of shit tried so hard to represent everything as hard facts, but no it does not have to be historically accurate to be a good movie.

Tarantino made Inglorious Bastards and that's a good movie that's completely historically inaccurate on purpose.

>>80684867
And it's not marketed as a historical movie based on true events either you stupid fucking braindead nigger

>>80683945
How is anything he said related to /pol/? This movie is for a fact oscar bait and there were far more important persons involved, who the movie could have been about.

>>80684705
Because people believe whatever they're told. And muh racism.

>>80680940
>black women are responsible for America putting men on the moon
top kek

>>80684865
NIGGERS

File: 1462557369565.gif (174KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 300x300px

>>80681090

WE

File: Oh_My_Sides!.jpg (8KB, 199x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 199x200px

>>80681090

>>80681253

not an argument

>>80682039
Why am I not surprised?

File: 1473490715461.jpg (101KB, 682x600px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 682x600px

>>80681090