What are some kino's about the military industrial complex

jurassic world

wtf i hate drumpf now

>Doing nominal amounts instead of percentage increases

Financial times has really started to become shit

>>80635235
It's owned by the Japs now.

>>80634528
what does this represent

>>80634528
Oh Jesus, what are you obese american idiots invading now?

>>80635235
That would make the chart more inaccurate.

>>80636651
honestly we'll take any country at this point

>>80635235
>objective statistics are skewed against trump

>>80636651
Iran is next up desu

>>80634528

At least he is not adding to the deficit with his budget proposal, which is more than we can say for most past presidents.

>>80636891
These agencies all have different budgets to begin with, it's stupid to count a billion dollar increase/decrease as the same for all of them

>>80634580
I know this is sarcastic but up until late summer/ early fall he was talking about scaling back the military.

>>80637044
Not really, dollars are worth the same amount across all agencies.

>>80637114
Another dollar towards a smaller agency goes much further than towards the military

If one were to keep steady with the pace of inflation a 1.5% increase in all of them would have massive disparities in flat dollars

I'm not defending Trump being a retard and going full 1984 with the military, just pointing out how intentionally misleading a chart like that is

>>80634528
NEED DEM F-35's, FUCK THE WARTHOG

>>80637114
They should have both charts, one with percentages and the absolute amounts.

Liberals always use strawmen like 'well the dollars are saem!', the issue is whether or not the way statistics are presented are skewing perception.

>>80636945
he's adding to the mental deficit by cutting from education

>>80637044
>DoHaHS
Annual 1 trillion
So about 1% cut
>DoE
Annual 68 billion
13% cut


>DoD
Annual 534.3 billion
So a 10% increase

I don't see your point Anon.

>>80637250
>They should have both charts, one with percentages and the absolute amounts.
No, that would defeat the purpose of a chart.

>>80637057

he was never talking about that. you are flat out lying.

>>80637326
It's ok Anon doesn't mean what he says he's just being symbolical

Like tru

>>80637308

if we wanted to become smarter as a nation the first thing we'd do is eliminate all public funding for education period. no public schools. no funds for schools. nothing. done. over. gone. then, maybe, we could learn something. as it stands the government is the #1 impediment to intelligence in this nation. luckily betsy devoss seems like an alright lady and she's intent on closing the doors on the 'department of education', for good. it's long overdue.

>>80637308
% cuts are much more representative of reality

These agencies have fixed and variable costs, cutting a billion dollars from a 1.1 billion dollar agency is much different than cutting it from the military in terms of effect

FT is making all the cuts look tiny in comparison to the military increase, my point is how retarded that is since the cuts are actually much more drastic

>>80637424
hahahahahaha

>>80637452
>% cuts are much more representative of reality
Except not really and that only works towards obfuscating the data being presented, to make your narrative more comfortable. This amount is disproportionate, also.

File: tips.gif (2MB, 380x285px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 380x285px

>>80637424

>>80637317

>including more information would defeat the purpose of the chart

oh, and whats the purpose?

anyways, 'health and human service'. bullshit. delete it. 'state and usaid'. malignant bullshit. delete it. 'education'. shut it down. delete. 'housing and urban development. not necessary. delete. 'agriculture'? shut it down. delete. transportation? delete. 'commerce'? maybe that can be argued for, as well as 'the interior' whatever tha means, justice, NASA, but they probably can be much more efficient with some draconian measures. small business administration, also dooes not need to exist.

>>80637535
What is my narrative? I literally just said they're helping Trump with this retarded nominal increase shit if anything

>>80637477
>>80637538

case in point.

>>80637424
>>80637551
Imagine actually thinking like this. That'd be pretty wild, huh.

>>80636651
If you all paid for your own militaries we wouldn't have to be the worlds babysitter

File: tipss.gif (2MB, 350x295px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x295px

>>80637605
My public education has clearly been out-shadowed by your self-found private intellect.

I tip my hat to you, sir.

On Topic:
Pentagon Wars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXQ2lO3ieBA

>>80637639

no, it'd get you labelled as a liberal 50 years ago, and a centrist today.

>>80637673

your public education made you retarded.

>>80637535
The middle of the chart would actually be proportionate if it was %.

>Arguing with libcucks over budgets
>Ever

All they know how to do is deficit spend with 0 experience of finance or accounting, why even bother

>>80636651
Norks

File: a10_2.jpg (44KB, 620x371px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 620x371px

>Implying our military knows how to spend that money.

>>80637859

and deficit spending on a hallucinated banking system of usury and debt is the scheme of the jew

this is exactly why hitler forced them to move to isreal.

File: 1407742929713.png (497KB, 526x619px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 526x619px

>>80637968
>and deficit spending on a hallucinated banking system of usury and debt is the scheme of the jew

where did everything go so wrong

>>80637859
good goy

>>80638233

when hitler lost.

>killing old people when old people vote republican

>>80634528
>>80636651

The defense budget is separate from the military budget.

File: IMG_0254.png (423KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 800x450px

>>80634528
BvS.

>>80635235
Percentage makes it look like he's cutting WAY more than he's increasing.

>>80637792
The chart would show the exact same bars. You can't twist the data in a chart. You also can't assess the importance of the difference departments by percentages. The only relevant figure in percentages would be the percentage of the entire budget going to each dpt. but that would make things look even worse.
We're also looking at cuts here, and a ridiculous increase in the military side.

>>80637308
MA by it's self is still in top 10 in all education categories. even coming directly behind Singapore in some.

>>80639859

>you can't twist the data in a chart

please don't be serious.

>>80634528
wtf I love drumpf now

This is what you have to realize about most public spending: It's all for the benefit of the wealthy.

Sure, you can hate the niggers who live off of food stamps, section 8, and medicaid, or the old fucks who consume two-fifths of the budget between Medicare and Social Security, but who actually ends up with that money? Their landlords, their doctors, the large corporations who receive the money they spend (1/3 of Walmart's revenue in the U.S. comes from SNAP). They get to make money off of people that, without that government money, would not be consumers. The increased demand leads to raised prices too, on top of the taxes you pay to fund all that shit, which the wealthy dutifully avoid paying.