http://bloody-disgusting.com/movie/3427951/sxsw-first-footage-it-awesome/
I WANT THAT TEEASEEER NOOOOOOWWW!!!
>>80586653
Fuck off.
DRIDER KINO
IT'S COMING BOYS
>>80584906
>2017
>People still being tricked by a cool-looking trailer
Why don't they ever learn?
>>80584906
They all float.
>>80589239
And soon you will float too.
tfw no orgy, but gay scene with Bowers and that psycho would be great.
fuug
>>80589507
Gay scene with Bowser?
Who wrote this shit, /v/?
>>80584906
>It's a shill thread episode
yawn
>>80589831
Wasnt there that fucked up dude who was sucking Bowers off and Beverly saw that?
>>80589790
Yeah that sounds like bullshit.
>>80584906
honestly that doesnt sound too bad actually. Better than carey's script
>>80589507
>child orgy scene
What?
>>80590393
CHILD ORGY SCENE
>>80590393
Here's a spoiler for book of thatAfter defeating Pennywise as children, Beverly wanted to clear everyones head or something and she fucked them all in order. Ben was biggest lel, she felt like she would get ripped apart. Her love interest was last oh and yeah, they all came inside her, they were like 11-12 at time.
>>80590678
noice
>>80590678
stop exaggerating shit for your own weird perverse projection.
>>80590862
B-but that's how it was.
Will the drider be in the gangbang?
>>80587930
This.
Unless you're Ghostbusters 2016 almost any film can scrape together enough good footage for a decent trailer.
>>80590922
no but a spider might watch in the corner of the sewer
>>80590922
You wish, huh?
>>80584906
>2017
>expecting movies to be good
>especially "remakes"
time truly is a flat circle
>>80590862
All of that is actually in the book. It's not terribly erotic, but each of those points are detailed.
>>80584906
Based Finn saving another project
>>80589790
>Finn's parents were okay with the sex scene
based
>>80593316
I feel like we should send them a gift basket or something. Maybe a spa day? They seem like good people.
>>80589790
I heard he left because he wanted to make it drastically different. He wanted to set it in modern day New York City and shit. I doubt that "violating the spirit" of the book would have been a concern.
Official title
>It: Part 1 – The Losers' Club
I think it's going to be fucking awesome.
>>80594125
Well this one has imiliar changes. Kid events happen in 1989 and adult around 2010.
I wonder how they would have gone with all the "niggers" being thrown around at that time
>>80594125
"Not being allowed to direct Froggo's first sex scene" was the official reason Fukunaga cited in Variety.
>>80584906
wtf, is that Cameron Monaghan?
>>80594603
Hed be good for the drider
>>80594266
Who's he playing?
>>80595151
Ritchie.
>>80595151
Drider
>>80594323
Shifting the time frame is not nearly as drastic of a change as changing the location to New York.
>>80584906
https://mega.nz/#!tF1kDK4T!K1vG082gTOvYZ2GCBIJ2TuqHxOn9RtRX_blxRUv_k-A
Here's the """"amazing"""" Fukunaga script that would've """"transformed""""" horror as we know it.
>>80594150
The chance of having a part 2 is quite low
>>80598132
Horror movies are typically pretty low budget and IT is a big name so odds of it being financially successful are good.
>>80598280
People won't watch it when they knowfinn wolfhardwon't be in part 2.
Unlesss they could find a way to shoehorn him in
>>80589790
Fukus script was dogshit. It was a clown the whole time and didn't follow the book at all. They changed character names and the kids kill it with a bunch of tools from wills(changed from bill) shed
>>80597628
Nice virus. No thanks
>>80598439
They could just get some popular actors for part two. How bout we cast it in this thread.
>>80598773
Fuck off to le ddit
>>80598773
I'd suggest Finn Wolfhard
BD also said Blair Witch was amazing and would forever change horror.
>>80597628
>using Beethoven's Fur Elise ten seconds into the fucking movie
Fukunaga is such a hack holy shit
>>80599066
It did forever change horror, just in a bad way. Where did you think the modern trend of shitty horror came from?
>>80590678
>missing the entire point
they had to shed their childhood innocence in order to escape
therefore: orgy
>>80599066
>website dedicated to horror films
>so starved for anything decent in the dead genre that they blow their load over something which looks decent enough
its like reviewing food on a desert island and finding half a kit kat wash ashore
>>80599066
The original is amazing and one of the only good found footage shot movies.
>>80599446
Marble Hornets is fantastic.
>>80599608
It was, it turned to garbage as soon as the mask wearing faggot appeared. It lost subtly.
>>80598580
I know you're embarrassed about your script now that it's out in the public, but the people have every right to know.
Why are we getting this movie again when there are so many other King books that should get an adaptation?
>>80601413
Because it is clearly a star-vehicle for this generation's Laurence Olivier? Would you say that 1948's Hamlet should have been scrapped because Timon of Athens still hadn't been done yet?
>>80601413
because the first adaptation was
>terrible
>a bad adaptation
>a tv movie not a film
>>80601587
I feel like someone at Collider is probably a /tv/ lurker. It is the only explanation I can see for making him wear that.
>>80601640
Tim Curry was great, everything else in the original adaptation is pretty fucking bad.
>>80601413
its one of his most famous and universally acclaimed.
>>80602376
Yeah but it's not his best. They need to branch out more.