[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

>The classic 1946 French version of Beauty and the Beast (La

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 124
Thread images: 19

File: Beauty-Beast-2017-Movie-Posters.jpg (207KB, 702x1024px) Image search: [Google]
Beauty-Beast-2017-Movie-Posters.jpg
207KB, 702x1024px
>The classic 1946 French version of Beauty and the Beast (La Belle et la Bête) featured an opening epigraph that explained the concept behind director Jean Cocteau’s live-action fairy tale: “Children believe what we tell them. They have complete faith in us.” That faith gets compromised in the new live-action musical Beauty and the Beast. Its attempt to sneakily indoctrinate children (and adults) into Disney Corporation banality recasts the nature of parent-child (and Hollywood-consumer) relations so that that bond is subsumed in state-sponsored political correctness. This new version — with its feminist Belle (Emma Watson), a crude, chauvinist-male Beast (Dan Stevens), and a “diverse” underclass of servants and objects-come-to-life (performed by Josh Gad, Audra McDonald, Emma Thompson, Ewan McGregor) — is a fairy tale that confuses liberal social engineering with “magic.”

>Viewers — particularly parents — who cannot discern the difference between entertainment and propaganda may have already been duped by Disney’s long-standing entertainment hegemony. It’s a mistake to think that such propaganda is innocent storytelling. This Millennial Beauty and the Beast becomes grim progressive silliness when it erases basic gender distinctions and politicizes the background and experience of the commoner Belle and the aristocratic Beast. It’s a blockbuster touting specious lessons in Occupy logic and “tolerance.”

As usual, Armond speaks the truth. He IS the best movie critic working today, and whoever says the opposite is a plebeian faggot. Or worse, a /r/movies user.
>>
Best Belle coming through
>>
File: 18WHITE-videoSixteenByNine1050.jpg (113KB, 1050x591px) Image search: [Google]
18WHITE-videoSixteenByNine1050.jpg
113KB, 1050x591px
>>80550264
>He IS the best movie critic working today
>>
>>80550345
She's a complete turbo slut though.
>>
>>80550424
Fuck you. Rumbelle is end game
>>
>>80550375
Yes. He is.
>>
He's not wrong
>>
>>80550264
I actually watched the criterion version, and it put me to sleep. Very pretty, but it didn't really grab me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6qDPCh33fg
now this, this is masterful
>>
>>80550345

>When she loses her memories and shatters the teacup

a mixture of emotions to be honest and none of them good
>>
>>80550264
not reading all that. is this /pol/ crying more about some shit i don't care about?
>>
>>80550739
iktf
>>
>>80550264

>a crude, chauvinist-male Beast

So par for the course?
>>
>>80550785
TL;DR version

>WAAAH IT HAS A GAY AND BLACKS IN IT I'M SO TRIGGERED
>>
>>80551104
Wew, maybe read the text before commenting. You cant refute anything he says.
>>
File: 357294830.jpg (69KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
357294830.jpg
69KB, 640x360px
>>80550345
No, this is the best Belle
>>
>>80550345
That's not Lea Sedoux
>>
File: 1447424203499.jpg (30KB, 524x336px) Image search: [Google]
1447424203499.jpg
30KB, 524x336px
>>80552122
>>
I like Armond's negative reviews
>>
>>80551920
>You cant refute anything he says.
How about the fact that this the only real difference between this version and the last disney version is that this is live action
If the live action version only just now compromises whatever sanctity this reviewer is deciding to defend, clearly this reviewer is only responding to a presence of politically forward thinking that has been present the entertainment industry for quite some time now.
tl;dr the person who wrote this is full of bullshit, the last disney version was just as politically correct in terms of gender distinctions and social class division
>>
>>80553480
>the live action is just the same as the last Disney version
That's exactly what he's saying though, that Disney been pushing this for quite a long time.

>may have already been duped by disneys long standing entertainment hegemony
>>
Anyone else here decided not to see this as soon you heard about it?
>>
>>80554031
why would one see a live action adaption of the beauty and the beast
what do you hope to see that would actually be exciting and/or an improvement over the classic

seriously unless you're a child who wasn't around back then or the parent of one such child, what the fuck do you do with this movie
>>
>DUDE I'VE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT HES TALKING ABOUT (because its gibberish) BUT HE SAID DISNEY AND SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND THAT CONFIRMS MY DELUSIONS THERFEOFRE HES AWESOME LMAO

...
>>
>>80554031
As soon as I heard that manface watson was belle yes
>>
>>80550264
He literally just takes his ideas from /tv/ and /pol/
>>
>>80554217
terrible bait
>>
>>80554388
>implying any of those boards features an original thought
>>
File: emma_watson1.jpg (108KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]
emma_watson1.jpg
108KB, 667x1000px
Should I pay $21 for Imax tickets? I think it will make my gf want to fuck me.
>>
>>80551104
It was literally written by a black, gay man.
>>
File: wbeast.jpg (603KB, 702x1024px) Image search: [Google]
wbeast.jpg
603KB, 702x1024px
>>
>>80550375
>/pol/ believes blacks are intelectually inferior unironically and call for a race war
>one of the few voices on the mainstream calling on the social justice bullshit is a black man
>>
>>80554844
Being able to speak against it and remain mainstream is literally black privilege.
>>
>>80554495
>should I give my shekels to (((Disney)))
No. However, I do want to see Pirates 5... so I'm torn.
>>
>>80554890
If I was black, I wouldn't see the point of going against the social justice narrative. The other side literally want to kill me
>>
Why does Emma Watson always look miserable, even when she smiles?
>>
>>80555060
feminism
>>
>>80555060
because she has been a millionaire since she was a child and therefore has never really had to worry about anything, meaning that it takes a lot to make her genuinely happy.

She's like a character in a Brett Easton Ellis or Douglas Copeland novel except she pretends to be a nice person.
>>
File: IMG_0441.jpg (584KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0441.jpg
584KB, 1200x1600px
>>80550345
>>80552100
>>80552122
young Rebecca De Mornay
>>
>>80550785
No, it is Armond White (black film critic) saying the Jews are Jewing it up with no shame now.
>>
>>80550264
Damn this man is really on point actually.

This is exactly it though. You can't be a true rebel or bohemian and support this technocratic state-sponsored social-engineering shit. It's so tepid, and even... EVEN if the values were good - which they aren't - the way they are implemented and the overall feel of it is unacceptable.

I would rather have some wildness that lets a lot of messy human nature to do its thing than some sickly, rationalistic, "functioning" social democratic technocracy.

Give me INTERESTING and VITAL.
>>
liberals are truly the enemy of mankind
>>
>>80550264
B A S E D
A
S
E
D
>>
>>80554178

hell seeing the shitty 3D animation disney pumps out now is sad compared to how good Beauty and the Beast looks for a 26 year old film
>>
>>80554495
>paying you gf for sex
>>
>>80550264
that thumbnail really brings out her manface
>>
>>80550375
He looks like Eddie Murphy dressing up to play a side character in one of his movies
>>
>>80556058
> Tfw Armond White literally has been Eddie Murphy all along.
>>
Just went on it, it blew me away. I reccomend it. You can jump on this meme wagon or take it for what it is.

First of all the plot is a lot better and fleshed out than in the original movie. We get extra songs to add to the old ones, the beasts past is touched upon and the most important one imo: Belle has a reason for staying in the castle and not 'exploring the world'. New enchanted object can basically teleport her whereever to complement the mirror which can show her anyone

To the visual design, I looooved. Shit. Like you can tell that the designer wanted that cold steel blue and golden yellow to clash so beautifully. It didn't feel like a kids movie with a crude blue and piss yellow. Every shot and its colors were carefully thought out to make the most of everything.

I liked the fashion of the era. The clothes are real interesting to see, and they are beautiful. The CGI is bit weird, but it didn't ruin the movie.

I already love musicals so that was just the icing on the cake.

To the actors, Emma is already making Stewart Kristen look like she is over performing. Not the main star of the movie.

Gaston, what a man. He's got the charm nailed down 100 % and looks like a fox in a mans skin. The way he walks, talks everything is perfect.

Lefou, I hated him in the original version, which I suppose was the role he was meant to fufill. But in this one you strt to get a feel for the sass that Lefou brings to the table. Was smiling most of the time when he was on stage.

Cons:
Annoying kid cup
annoying dog thing
made the triplets look ugly
>>
>>80550264
The king of /tv/ has spoken.
>>
>>80556819
cont.

The evil sorceress got touched upon. Started to learn the reasons for why she basically doomed hundreds of people to slavery and then sudden death at the end of the curse. She is a poor spinster living in the village which everyone mistreats. However I suspect that over time the aristocrats treated her more poorly, which is why she focuses her rage on them, but still inadverting hurting the ones closest to the aristocrats: the towns people who look down on her. She gets revenge on everyone. Everyone loses their memory, which is why nobody notices that giant castle.

We get to see Belle making some cool stuff to wash laundry, I'll admit I wouldn't have thought of that. Maybe I should invest in a mule and a big ass tub to wash my clothes for cheap.

Lot of emphasis on roses, making the main enchanted rose more important, overall the movie is keeping its shit alot more together than the original one.

Only cringed once in the movie, when the Beast was eating its food with his face. The sounds he made were so fake and cartoony. Snapped me out of it for a moment.

fucking yes Lefou gets some at the end of the movie
>>
This doesn't actually tell me anything about the movie itself
>>
>mfw seeing THAT controversial gay scene

I seriously can't believe they went that far in a kids film. I'm glad I went alone to scout out the movie before taking my kids
>>
>>80550651
kek

>>80557207
>gets some
some what? Dick?
>>
File: to the side.jpg (40KB, 384x379px) Image search: [Google]
to the side.jpg
40KB, 384x379px
>>80557735
>mfw half of /tv/ is busy condemning grown men fucking each other in the ass while the other half is masturbating over children actors.
>>
>>80550375
I thought he was wearing prison overalls for a second there.
>>
>>80557987
Lefou deserves to get his dick wet...even if it has to be anal juices. He got cucked fucking hard in the original, now his character has more going for him than a sterotypical gay stalker. He actually got some balls, literally and figuratively at the end of the movie.
>>
>>80557573
Well then obviously you've been brainwashed by the gay Jews who run Disney, the straight-white-male exterminating NWO enforcement agency.
>>
>>80554844
>I have no idea what /pol/ is like, but I'm going to describe it anyway...
>>
>two males smile and dance with each other for one second in the movie
THE SCANDAL
>>
>>80554844
>/pol/ believes blacks are intelectually inferior unironically
That's an objective, scientific, empirical fact though...
>>
>>80558364
What's next, uncensored anal fisting?
You know those Gays. Give them an inch and they take a mile of dick
>>
>>80550264
>As usual, Armond speaks the truth.
TFW you're so starved for validation you pretend Armond White isn't a comedy performer and eat up whatever he shits on a page before even watching the movie.
>>
So is Gaston even fucking in it, or what?
>>
>>80558694
Gaston is the cake man, he's more of a main character than the beast is
>>
>>80554844
/pol/ believes this based on the average. Nobody denies there are outliers
>>
>>80554844
I believe that different races have different behavioral traits based on genetics. I believe that blacks have a propensity for poorer critical thinking, snap judgment, and risk-reward analysis compared to other races.

However, just because they have an ingrained genetic propensity for those negative traits does not mean all africans exhibit them. Only a sith deals in absolutes.
>>
>>80557573
Because it's a review, not a spoiler.
>>
>>80550264
beauty and the beast is one of the most shit stories ever created, and disney's cartoon musical is among the worst movies in their catalog.
>>
File: Emma Watson, yesterday.jpg (6KB, 256x192px) Image search: [Google]
Emma Watson, yesterday.jpg
6KB, 256x192px
>>80550264
I'm surprised by how bad the poster is at concealing Emma Watson's unsuitability for the role. The way they've shooped her, she looks like, hmm.... Hume Cronyn.
>>
>>80550651
>the criterion version

>thinking criterion is the fucking studio
>>
>>80550264
>(Dan Stevens)

So they're ripping off Cocteau's idea of making the Beast look slightly effeminate once changed back to human form, eh?
>>
>>80558605
No, we won the election, but cultural battle has been joined. Disney are peddling weirdy shit. People are pointing it out.

I used to think Armond White was risible, but he isn't really, he's just dissident in an unexpected direction.
>>
>>80559903
Easily. Look at Rachel Maddow.

>>80554986
No we don't, CTR.
>>
>>80550345
Her face is fat as fuck
>>
>>80554844
1. There are, as someone's said, outliers.

2. That's kind of the point - even a darky-darky bongo chocolate dinge porch monkey can see through SJW shit, so whites have no excuse.
>>
>>80555343
This is a brilliant insight. We need to save her, lads, we need to cheer her up.
>>
>>80555343
very good post
>>
>>80558364
>>80558509

It's the fact that it's a calculation that's the problem. I welcomed the obvious gayness of Road to El Dorado. Their making it into a selling-point is the issue.
>>
>>80550264
>Its attempt to sneakily indoctrinate children (and adults) into Disney Corporation banality recasts the nature of parent-child (and Hollywood-consumer) relations so that that bond is subsumed in state-sponsored political correctness.

This is true.
Disney needs to stop shilling.
>>
>>80550264
I don't really see what kind of point Armond White is supposed to be making here. Sort of vaguely making the common right-wing implication that [insert multiple parentheses around media/entertainment company] is trying to break down society by normalizing "degenerative" behavior, wrapped in more complex vocabulary to make his review seem more intelligent. And keep in mind that White himself is a personal proponent of boipuccy. I dunno, maybe this review would make sense if I ever decided to watch this new Emma Watson movie, which I will not.
>>
>>80550264
>Emma Thompson

This is the horror, casting Richard Dawkins' lady clone to play "Belle" when you have a woman who in her day was an ultrafox and who many would still crawl a mile over broken glass to hear fart through a walkie-talkie to do voice acting.
>>
File: Rumbelle.jpg (83KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
Rumbelle.jpg
83KB, 1280x720px
>>80560553
Fuck off they're perfect
>>
>>80560887
Fucking hell, you're a bit of a thick cunt, aren't you? They are clearly pushing leftist drivel in this film, we know because they've promoted it on that basis. Armond White being the kind of person its intended to pander to is exactly why he's so valuable - when a guy who could clean up from a scam warns you about it instead, that's a guy worth respecting.
>>
>>80560970
This looks dreadful. Her face is not good, and the guy is weedy.
>>
>>80550264
They seem to have given her liver spots.
>>
File: rumpelbelle.jpg (50KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
rumpelbelle.jpg
50KB, 500x281px
>>80561044
>mfw talking to a pleb who doesn't like ouat
>>
>>80560527
>“Children believe what we tell them. They have complete faith in us.” That faith gets compromised in the new live-action musical Beauty and the Beast. Its attempt to sneakily indoctrinate children (and adults)
a black man that sees no problem with indoctrinating our children to believe bestiality is normal and quite beautiful.
wow, who would've thunk
>>
>>80553480
>If the live action version only just now compromises whatever sanctity this reviewer is deciding to defend
White hated the last Beauty and the Best too and has been writing against the same issues now for decades.

>>80554890
>remain mainstream
>National Review Online
The powers that be killed White's career for the things that he says. A few decades ago Pauline Kael wrote for The New York Times saying the exact same things but times have changed.

>>80557573
That's because OP is a stupid faggot who only took two paragraphs out of a long review because they were the most controversial.
>>
>>80550264
gender-bending ala david bowie at least comes from a place of appreciation of either gender, gender-elimination always comes from a pure disdain for masculinity.
>>
>>80550264
>a far right political insight into a children's movie
I don't necessarily agree with everything he says but his reviews are entertaining.
>>
>>80554844
>Complains about /pol/ on /tv/
>Later reports /pol/ posts for being off topic even though he's the cuck that started the political talk
Typical liberal cuck
>>
There's nothing wrong with seeing this flick as liberal propaganda(it probably is), but he never discussed the merits of the film at all. This review would hold a lot weight if he actually criticized the plot, the characters, the themes, the technical aspects, etc.. Atleast judge the film on its actual values, he's just unnecessarily injecting his political beliefs in this review.
>>
>>80561890
I wrote something similar in another thread but I will say it again. Beauty and the Beast is not just a nonsense children movie with no message. The original is basically template story for how a young girl becomes a women. It is basically the archetypal hero story applied to the feminine.

The protagonist has to replace the masculine figure in her life, her father, with her husband. He is a beast, a symbol of the unknown. Over the course of the story she confronts the unknown and in the process he is transformed into a beautiful man.. It is the same thing when the hero goes to kill the dragon to rescue the treasure. It is basically telling a women how to live a complete life, what difficulty they will face, and if they confront the unknown, and make it known, they can find great reward. To subvert that message is to do damage to all those who watch it
>>
>>80562112
>unnecessarily
Which parts of a review are necessary and why? Also did you read the whole review or just what OP posted?
>>
File: kek (2).jpg (48KB, 490x490px) Image search: [Google]
kek (2).jpg
48KB, 490x490px
I've seen Emma Watsons sad little tits.
She no longer has any power or sway over me whatsoever
>>
>>80555060
Because she's British
>>
>>80562449
her titties are pretty nice though
>>
>>80562175
Girls are taught to avoid the unknown, whereas B&B's message is the same as those taught to boys, just with a different context.

The story was always feminist, but in a much more subtle, yet more important way.

Classic feminism was about discovering oneself and one's potential as a human being.

Modern feminism has become narcissistic; about throwing people under the bus to sate ego, and scapegoating.
>>
>>80560440
when did I say it was the studio?
you know exactly what I mean by "Criterion version" you cunt. They obviously weren't around in the 40's or 50's
>>
>>80562449
She still has her bum to hold over you, anon.
>>
File: 1453529113693.jpg (52KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
1453529113693.jpg
52KB, 640x480px
>>80562449
>>
File: 1488772045444.jpg (252KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
1488772045444.jpg
252KB, 500x500px
>>80554844
>/pol/ believes in objective, measured facts while I delude myself! Take THAT!
>>
>>80562676
But it's like referring to "subtitled movies" as a genre. You had a pleb moment.
>>
>>80562112
Its political values are what it's being sold on.
>>
>>80562654
>classic feminism

Feminism, in every incarnation, has always been about the destruction of society. The adoption of marx has only made it that much more dangerous but never for a moment think it was benign. Regardless how can you claim beauty and the beast was ever a feminist story? The entire premise of the story revolves around a girl learning to love a man and take on a traditional role in society, that of a wife.
>>
>>80562654
The story was not always feminist, the entire point of the story is learning to accept being penetrated by a man's cock. That's the point. The "I don't need no man, I's a woke-ass ironing board" ideology is a poor fit to this tale.
>>
>>80562896
by using the word version instead of release?
No, I did not have a "pleb" moment.
You're arguing semantics at best, and you're just purposely disingenuous cuz you know what I mean
>>
>>80550264
Saw it earlier today. This review is 100% accurate

Quite a few kids in the theater. They all seemed unimpressed and unhappy by the end of the movie
>>
>>80556819
>im a humongous faggot please rape my face


FTFY
>>
File: IMG_1159.png (676KB, 614x614px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1159.png
676KB, 614x614px
>>80550264
>>
>>80550264
Y'all are as retarded as sjws when it comes to movies,shows, any form of entertainment connecting the dots to form some retard shit just like the sjws when they think movies whitewash or have male leads to prepertuate the "patrichary"or some bullshit like that.
>>
>>80563103
t. sjw
>>
White is spot on here. The 1946 one is a masterwork that deals with the dualism of the soul and man's inner turmoil—something the subsequent Disney adaptations chose to ignore entirely.
>>
>>80562981
Yes, because "version" means something entirely different.

I'm not arguing semantics, you said something that made you sound like Cletus, just let it go.
>>
>>80563260
no, you're a retard.
Kill yourself, thanks.
version can apply to the group that released that particular DVD.
For video games there are NTSC VERSIONS and PAL VERSIONS for example. If you think that means I'm saying both versions where respectively made by the regions they relate to, then you are a dumb nigger.
>>
File: you.jpg (121KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]
you.jpg
121KB, 1440x1080px
>>80563383
You weren't talking about the DVD though, were you? You were talking about the film. You attributed the film to the company that released the DVD. Just let it go man.
>>
>>80550264
I'm just sad they didn't cast this honestly and have a decent 10 or 12 year old actress play Belle and a 30+ year old noble "marry" her and go balls deep.
>>
>>80556819
>We get extra songs to add to the old ones,
This one? Please?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2QKDfAiTq4
>>
>>80554844
If Armond white teaches us anything, it should be, "whether or not blacks are intellectually inferior, those who display noteworthy intelligence should not be ignored but rather supported to a great extent because they the few will speak for their entire race."

See, that's the thing about people like Camille paglia (lesbo 'feminist') and Armond white. They realize that science beats out everything else. Yea, blacks have been discriminated against for a long time, and yea, that's definitely part of the reason they're position in society is not great overall. But it may not be the whole reason. Likewise for females, yea, many of them are discriminated against from birth. But paglia realizes men on average have a shit ton more testosterone flowing through their veins; there are inherent differences (on average) between the sexes. To treat boys and girls the 'same' is logical suicide. These people are here to help us find the middle ground: those who show an ability to exist in defiance of our stereotypes should be allowed to exist how they want to. But that doesn't mean we should just throw out all our stereotypes.

"Stereotype" is a dysphemism (antonym of euphemism) for "the best guess I can make with the knowledge that has been presented to me up until now." If you, as a person, don't have some stereotypes then you're an idiot. You know the athletes at your school are more likely to be dumbasses. You know to be cautious around a large group of black people at night. There's nothing wrong with that. What's wrong is when someone, through action and will, attempts to escape that stereotype and you refuse to let them out of it.
>>
File: 4L_oIL7qf1H.jpg (996KB, 2563x1709px) Image search: [Google]
4L_oIL7qf1H.jpg
996KB, 2563x1709px
Emma Watson was a horrible Belle. Her British accent took away from the fact that they're French. Their fascination with British literature and history was also a horrible addition. They're French, they have their own arts and history.

When they sang Be My Guest, the scene ended with them celebrating in front of the Taj Mihal. When the hell did France have a fascination for India? Is it wrong to celebrate your own accomplishments now?
>>
>>80550264
>"Beauty"
>>
>>80550264
I don't know who that guy is but this is probably gunna be my movie of the year

>Dat BONJOUR
>Dat no like x's like Gaston
>Dat fight scene
>Dat lonely tower
>>
>>80564818
Also
>BE MY GUEST
>>
>>80564818
It's my movie of the year too.

The year 1991
Thread posts: 124
Thread images: 19


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.