The Lobster

File: the_lobster_01.webm (3MB, 960x520px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 960x520px

it's great

was it autism?

1st half > 2nd half

Still an interesting movie tho

>>80535304
Hahaha, that scene was great. What /tv/ wants to be.

>>80535245
Ending is great.

>>80535550
He just left right?

>>80535245
It is a great, fucked up satire on relationships. I enjoyed it although yes, its a fucking difficult watch for the uninitiated.

>>80535714
Mate, no. He Oedipused.

Exceedingly weird but I liked it a lot. Hotel chick that helps him escape was 3cute5me

>>80535714
He came back and pretended to be blind.

>>80535245
it's some kind of dark humor greek comedy genre, that's why it's weird

>>80535799
What do you mean? She was just left sitting there.

>>80535245
I liked it. The second half was pretty different to the first but equally messed up.
Also very funny

>>80535799
Nope, he just left her sitting at the table. He never came back.

>>80535403
this desu

it's still good but wew the second half has no idea what it's doing, good ending though

>>80535245
essential numale core

>>80535714
Yeah

>>80535765
How is it about Oedipus?

>>80535245
my fav part was where she said that she immediately imagined him fucking her in the ass the first time she saw him.

>>80535967
oedipus cut his eyes out. read a book

>>80535970
Yeah man, I got a half chub.
Rachael Weisz is hot as fuck.

>>80535998
Sorry, I have not read the book, just know the general theme. But still, I don't think he did that.

>>80536009
but the female company at the time said this movie is weird af after she said that so I'm guessing that that's something women wouldn't normally ever think.

>>80535824
It's one of the theories.

Big Keith doesn't age

File: Denial-1-e1466027073480.jpg (27KB, 499x299px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 499x299px

>>80536009
>Rachel Weisz is hot as fu-

>>80535998
But Ferrel left at the end

>>80536080
holy shit youre dumb

>>80536112
i think you're misremembering bud. the film doesn't show him leaving OR cutting his eyes out.

>>80536179
So what do you think happened? They end the movie with her just sitting there alone. The most obvious thing is that he just left and didnt cut his eyes out.

the leader of the outcasts was hot as fuck.

Why did that lady shoot the donkey at the start?
Also, why didn't the other donkey just run off? He just stood around like an idiot. Stupid asshole.

>>80536209
what happened is he considered cutting his eyes out. that's all. you can experience and think about a film without being concerned with what "happened" in the context of the film, can't you?

So someone didn't think that the cutting to black implied him blinding himself. Interesting.

>>80536378
>>80536386
Good points here. I just assumed he didn't but it's nice to speculate. I like that.

>>80536378
>you can experience and think about a film without being concerned with what "happened" in the context of the film

theoretically you could but why would you

>>80535245
Some of it was a little tryhard
The "well assign you a child if you're unhappy" bit stands out as too on the nose
Other than that though it was one of my favorites of 2016. Definitely memorable

>>80536386
cutting to black is the conventional way of ending a movie

>>80536428
the lobster is from 2015

Léa Seydoux is very fine.

I started watching it and dropped it after he escaped into the woods because it looked like it was gonna turn really boring after that.

>>80536386
yeah so I guess the main character in half the movies ever to exist also went blind at the end, good point anon, I never thought of it that way

>>80536518
It's not really boring but the first half was more interesting than the second half. Still good though, worth it. Maybe a little slow at the worst.

>>80536518
You guessed right to some extend but youre still a massive faggot in my eyes.

>>80536036
i dont think it was shown but it was heavily implied. i left the theater thinking he did so

>>80536444
>>80536544
sup reddit

do you also think that the sopranos "just ended"?

>>80536729
i've never seen the sopranos thus confirming i am not a redditor

the dog dying really upset me

>>80536729
no apparently tony went blind

>>80536209
How do you even get out without anyone seeing you. There were no windows in the bathroom and they were sitting right next to the exit.

>>80536964
Well he did. Also dead.

>>80536470
European release dates are irrelevant, its actual release was may 2016

>>80536976
Don't know what you mean.

>>80537143
It was released when it was released. So, 2015.
It doesn't have to be another continent dick measuring, just the facts.

>>80535245
I hated this movie. It felt like the comedy was derived from things that are funny or strange to turbo-normies. The message of the movie felt like it was your typical "it's best in the middleground" southpark style message. Some interesting concepts and camera angles though so I'd give it a 5/10 for showing me some new things.

>>80537333
KIll yourself, retarded tripfag. Every thread you come in instantly becomes worse.

>>80537497
I had the same feelings. I automatically wanted to berate him. Hated it but it's a 5/10? Doesnt even understand his own rating system. What a fucking ideot.

>>80535245
I like but I agree with the whole first half is better then the second half.

Also it was fun seeing the same brittbog from Hanna pop up in the movie.

>>80537528
You can hate a 10/10 movie. I hated the shawshank redemption but it's still a 8/10 movie.

I very clearly detailed what I hated about it and what I liked about it, unlike you.

>>80537333
I also hated it, but I hate you even more.

>>80535788
She's the director's wife. They're cute.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QAY9OY-ho4

>>80537628
That's the dumbest reasoning I have ever heard.

>>80537714
Say the director raped you and used footage of it in a great movie. You're gonna hate the movie but if you are intellectually honest you know it's a 10/10 KINO

>>80537143
this
>>80537235

If you put this movie in your top 10 list of 2016 I'll find you and rip you apart motherfucker.

File: PaNOa8lTinPk4cI6z_WbYjBoGtPPCGQ_-17-0iNI8e8.png (183KB, 808x767px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 808x767px

I thought this movie was going to be about a lobster.

>>80537750
wow. youre an insane person. im sorry to hear that.

>>80537628
In this post you refer to the rating system as an objective idenitfier of the movie's quality, while in this >>80537333 post it is clear you rank it based on both its objective quality (angles conecepts) and the fact you didn't like it.

Objective ranking is about 8+/10 but I loved it personally.

>>80538086
>objective identifier
what was I thinking, ugh
more like "a number that shows the objective quality of the movie"

>>80538086
No, both new angles and new concepts doesn't make something objectively good. All of these ratings are subjective, I don't think it's worth rating a movie in its entirety on anything else.

It being subjective doesn't mean im just gonna say whatever I feel like without anything to back my opinion, I can still acknowledge great movie making and give credit where credit is due.