Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: IMG_0739.jpg (128KB, 750x740px) Image search:
[Google]
128KB, 750x740px
She sounds so lifeless, and like all of her energy is going into not sounding terrible, but not adding any emotion.
Just in this clip, compare how the two say "charming"
Emma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LwuFHik2Mk
Original Belle (skip to 1:30 for where Emma starts, 1:50 for "charming")
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBRpjdMD77w
Fuck Emma, she phoned it in. MEW could've made a great Belle, and she can actually sing.
#notmybelle
>>
The only difference is the singer in the cartoon is slightly laughing during that part. Emma is just playing is straight.
>>
>>80533967
That doll is hyper realistic
>>
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
>>
>>80534026
But that little laugh adds way more emotion behind the word, and it shows that that character is actually reflecting on what she is saying (ie "lol, he really isn't a Prince Charming")
But then the pitch that the cartoon belle reaches on the "no" impresses me way more that anything Emma does
>>
>>80534026
No, the only difference is she can voice ACT and Emma can't ACT at all
>>
she's a pasty coathanger showcasing the worst aspects of liberal education, hope united nations get moved to gabon before she becomes their chairswomanperson.
>>
>>80533967
>doesn't know how to timestamp on youtube in 2017
>>
>>80533967
wow she sings "charming" differently. big deal. you really think this was her decision or her lack of singing? it was the decision of whoever produced that shit you retard.
she is still a bad actress, but who cares about some children's cartoon movie.
>>
File: Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 14.44.15.png (22KB, 795x106px) Image search:
[Google]
22KB, 795x106px
>>80533967
>>
That does sound pretty weak.
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2