Have there been any movies filmed at 60 fps?

>>80434081
yes

>>80434134
k

>>80433855
only porn + go pro

kek

Possibly

The first hobbit was put out in 48fps and i saw it and loved it. i want more movies made that way but i guess too many old ppl got disoriented from it.

>>80433855
no

but there have been 48 fps (the Hobbit films) and 120 fps (Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk)

>>80433855
There have but they ended up looking like news or live sports.

>>80434228
How do you get disoriented from a smoother framerate?

>>80434275
As in not ridiculously choppy or blurry?

>>80433855
Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk just came out on 4K BluRay and is in 60FPS. The movie itself is shit but damn does the higher frame rate look sharp as fuck.

https://www.amazon.com/Billy-Lynns-Long-Halftime-Blu-ray/dp/B01LTHYDZA

Torrent Here:

https://kickass.cd/billy-lynns-long-halftime-walk-2016-2160p-hfr-uhd-bluray-hdr-dts-tt17292320.html

>>80434331

As in documentaries. Could see glue seeping out from Tauriels shelf ears

>>80434286
this reminds me of my mother when she bitched movies didnt show black bars anymore.

I want to film at 60fps and slow it down to 40% of its speed

>>80434228
I didn't get disoriented from it, I hated it because it immediately became apparent that I was watching actors in a set with fake props and scenery, and the whole thing looked like a cheaply produced soap opera

>>80433855
I'm sure you have good intentions, but please stop posting threads that imply 60fps is high frame rate. Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk gets it right with 120fps. We should be aiming for 120fps as standard, not compromising with 60fps.

>>80435188
This. 60FPS should be the bare minimum and can be achieved on just about any digital cinema camera. Cinema cameras that can push 4K at 120p aren't super common right now but they definitely exist, and the industry should be making every attempt to push towards 240p and producing 240hz TVs and cinema projectors in the future.

24FPS is a shit sucking bare minimum standard that was imposed 100 years ago because of the limited technology at the time. There is absolutely no excuse for it today if you are shooting on digital.

Whiny technophobes would complain at first but they would get used to it after a while, like those faggots that actually complain about 4K because "it's too clear"

>>80435876
>limited technology at the time
No, it was purely cost cutting. 60fps is possible with 1890s technology. 120fps would probably have been possible too if they really tried.

>>80433855
No. And won't be standarized in at least 25+ years.

>>80435188
It's high compared to fucking 24 fps.

Does it matter? We can't tell the difference between 30 fps and higher fps anyway

>>80435876
I hate shallow focus almost as much as I hate low motion quality, so I think 240fps may be counterproductive until we go to 100% CG (Final Fantasy: TSW) and don't have to worry about the limitations of real world optics.

>>80436402
I'm sorry to hear about your brain damage.

>>80434979
This is the thing. It's not that it's bad, it's just too realistic. It's like watching a movie from behind the scenes. All the "magic" is ruined.

>>80436529
I'm still open to the idea of being won over by HFR film. But it needs to be built from the ground up to run that way. Everything starting with pre production needs to be done with this in mind.

These films that are produced with 24fps in mind and they end up shooting at a higher frame rate just look terrible and unprofessional. It's insulting to all the guys that work really hard on them.

>>80437354
They could probably make 60FPS look really good if they weren't all cheap corner cutting jews. I've seen interviews with directors and people in the industry complaining about 4K because it reveals how terrible their shitty makeup and costume jobs are on actors. They are a bunch of lazy pricks.

>>80437354
The only thing you need for 120fps is good lighting. Shooting outdoors in daytime gets this automatically. Indoors is simply a matter of not being cheap and lazy. If they could shoot 24fps deep focus in the 1950s with incandescent lighting they can surely do 120fps today. And bring back deep focus too. LED lighting is getting cheaper and better all the time. There's no excuse.

>>80434286
Feels unorthodox and looks cheap like a Telenovela