Is Martin Scorsese the greatest living artist?
>>80328972
Just what exactly are you trying to do?
do you reckon chloe let him eat her ass?
>>80328972
No, Terry Malick is
>>80328972
Who's that cutie beside him?
>>80328972
Scam artist? sure.
>>80328972
What is this expression meant to convey?
He's had quite the career and has made great movies even into his later years which can't be said of most
>>80329085
>some day i will be the biggest movie star in the world
>>80328972
Is Silence good? His older stuff is all kino, most of his recent stuff has been disappointing.
>>80329154
Mirin' those abs.
>>80329085
>>80329154
yall better stop making fun of Chloe before she hulk-jumps on your houses and rips you to shreds.
>>80329154
i-is this shooped?
>>80329204
thats the bottom of her ribcage
>>80328972
>>80329215
its hard to believe that this is the same girl who played the Hit-Girl
No, Madonna is.
Directing is hardly an art, most of the work is done by everyone else.
Even acting is more of an art.
>>80329414
>Madonna
This better be b8 you potential pleb
>>80329451
He's not wrong. If this was last year I would have said Bowie.
>>80328972
Absolutely not, Silence was a piece of boring steamy shit.
>>80328972
Do you think she had to service his wrinkly penis?
>>80329451
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hjxyc6BlT78
Madonna in her 70s is dancing like this and making bank lip syncing with stellar production and years of creativity behind her.
Martin Scorsese is just sitting on a chair being ugly and old.
>>80329414
>artist
>>80329561
yeah
the only thing she did wrong was let a dog eat her out, but even then, who are you to say it wasn't art?
>>80329451
She defined music for awhile and has pretty much never stopped preforming or changing her sound. There's a lot of documentaries about her that basically boil down to saying that every thing she does is a performance, really interesting stuff. Not to mention she's been a singer, director, actor, writer, model and photographer, keeping up with each (aside from film) into her 70's.
>>80329561
nice tiddies
>>80329599
w-what
>>80328972
D Lynch
T Malick
/film/ when
>>80329180
no it's basically trash with his name on it to make it sell to normies with little brains
>>80329608
>She defined music for awhile
No she did not. She was massively popular for a while but her contribution to the art of music is basically non-existent in the grand scheme of things.
>>80329724
___ ___ __________ _________
>>80329868
god this fucking genius?
>>80329847
you're either a youngling (early 20s or younger), or you don't listen to a lot of music outside of a genre or two
what did she mean by this?
>>80330056
that we are living in a material world
>>80329414
You have absolutely no idea about what you're talking about.
Anybody have that Chlopeye pic?
>>80329847
You weren't around in the 80's were you. Madonna was huge, you couldn't go a day without seeing reference to her. Girls were dressing like her, songs were copying her and her face was everywhere, something that went for almost ten years which is ridiculous considering how quickly trends in music shift.
>>80330414
Oldfag here, she was also pretty huge in the 90s
>>80329513
to be fair, she's 58 now
>>80329028
I would think it'd be him letting Chloe eat his ass
>>80330516
>>80328972
Martin Scorsese isn't even the greatest living Martin Scorsese
I am totally comfortable with saying he's the best director of his generation.
None of his colleagues have his track record.
Coppola, Spielberg and de Palma tapped out a long time ago.
Polanski is alright but not on Marty's level today. Woody Allen is legitimately impressive but too inconsistent.
>>80330667
Oh right, Cher is the 70 year old one.