What was his problem?
>>80317474
Cancer
He actually DID want to talk about Judy.
>>80317474
Why couldn't it have been Steven Tyler instead?
>>80317494
;__;
>>80317474
he wasnt a good musician
>>80317474
Josuke Higashikata
What the hell did he say there, Albert?
>>80317474
His problem was that he realized he was in one of the dullest franchises in the history of tv franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy FBI agent and his pals from Twin Peaks Sheriff Department as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Frost vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; he made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for his scripts. The Twin Peaks series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least FWWM was good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the script was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Lynch's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that he has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Twin Peaks by the same JJ Abrams. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are watching Twin Peaks at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to watch JJ Abrams." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you watch "Twin Peaks" you are, in fact, trained to watch JJ Abrams.
>>80318346
tl;dr
>>80318030
But, he was a great songwriter and performer. Everyone has their strengths.
>>80318615
He played a good chunk of instruments on most of his albums, he was mainly a saxophonist/keyboardist though
>>80318346
holy fuck
>>80318672
Yeah. He had a great ear for songwriting and played a few instruments well enough. He surrounded himself with superior musicians to carry out his vision for his songs. That other anon I replied to probably meant to be insulting, but to me saying Bowie wasn't a good musicians is relative. Who is a good musician? Let's just say, Mingus. He was a great musician, but he couldn't have wrote or sang like Bowie. Everyone has their strengths.
>>80318222
Check 'em Kira
He didn'tdieso good.