so much better than emma stone

If by better you mean not better sure.

>>80298297
She's shit and you're a fag

Is this one of those "shit nobody says" threads?

>>80298297
Maybe short hair Emma. The sign of a beautiful woman is being able to pull off a short hair cut

But even if you were even close to being in her league I doubt you'd be able to tolerate her constant foaming at the mouth of far left liberal trash

she has a terminal case of feminism

Is she losing her hair?

File: 1489160103910.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>80298297
Still inferior to Best Emma

#3 emma

What a terrible thread. Just the worst.

>>80298570
Is she, dare I say it, /ourhorse/?

emma! let me be your pusy slave!!!

>>80298732
Based pusyposter

>>80298297
good morning /b/tard. Back to your board now.

File: Flushed_poster.jpg (81KB, 300x441px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 300x441px

>>80298570

File: RMAO.png (102KB, 210x176px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 210x176px

>>80298297
>Oscars won: 0 (zero)

>>80298570
Literally who

>>80298297
Her feet aren't as good. Watson's toes are noodly and her soles are kinda flat. Stone has sexually-charged toes and a sexy vaulted arch.

>>80299520
What's your foot analysis of Robert's?

>>80299520
Stones feet are huge though. That automatically makes watsons better.

>>80298297
Does Watson have an Oscar? Didn't think so.

File: 1453724473816.jpg (2MB, 2220x3330px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2220x3330px

>>80300126
misshapen toes and too bony. kinda flat.

>>80300191
1) Size doesn't matter unless way too big or way too small. the proportionality is more important. Emma's foot proportions are pure estrogen.

2) Emma Watson's shoe size is 7 US and Emma Stone's shoe size is 7.5 US. They're very similar in size. Stone's only look bigger because her sexy high arch increases their vertical height over Watson's relatively flat feet.

Lets play a game /tv/

The 3 Emmas: Fuck, Marry, Kill

>>80298297
Emma Stone tried to call Warren Beatty a liar so fuck her