AVADA...

File: harrypotterfacts2.jpg (25KB, 517x323px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 517x323px

Yes,Yes well done Lucius, well done Lucius, HOWEVER

Was he seriously going to kill an 11 year old boy in Hogwarts school grounds?

File: 1488580396098.jpg (32KB, 402x414px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 402x414px

ACCIO DUBS

>>80121888
>>80122052
Had he done it, Voldemort would've won and bust him out of Alcatraz within a few years.

File: dullest.jpg (1MB, 1596x2867px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1596x2867px

>>80121888
If only one the wizards possessed a spell capable of erasing the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>80121888
I roll for deny the witch.

>>80122324
>Voldemort would've won and bust him out of Alcatraz
Ha!, you forget they needed harrys blood to restore voldemorts power.

File: 1488623039385.jpg (97KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 900x900px

What was that spell they used to make turds invisible?

>THIS IS FOR KILLING HITLER YOU BEADY EYED ANGLO FILTH!

Wow seriously?

>>80121960
house elves were retarded OP

>>80122610
Removus me poopus

File: back to reddit.jpg (94KB, 478x487px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 478x487px

>>80121888
KADABRA!

>>80122566
It wouldnt have taken exclusively Harrys blood to revive Voldemort, it was however the best blood deemed to make him most powerful. I would argue that Dumbledores blood would have sufficed.

File: IMG_1255.jpg (52KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1200x630px

>>80121888
CADO