Was this look in the script?

Yea.

>Orson looks smugly

Since Orson actually directed this movie, why not.

is this the smuggest look ever put on film?

>>80032347
uh, wut?

>>80032347
Go home Orson, you're drunk again.

>>80032365
Probably. Could I get a version with his hand on his chin?

>>80032176
I mean, he practically rewrote his entire part, so who knows.

>>80032467
>>80032425

>These plebs literally think Carol Reed directed the third man

Wew

>>80032521
care to provide sources saying otherwise?

>>80032614
Have you ever watched a Carol Reed movie without Orson Welles in it?

>>80032521
Orson even debunked this

>>80032669
so, no sources?

>>80032669
Several.

>>80032521
>>80032669
well, you got btfo. care to back up your assertions, mate? i'd love to be proven wrong that Orson didn't direct The Third Man.

>>80032176
No. Nor was the whole "cuckoo clock" speech ... as you can tell, because it's so jarring and out of place.

Orson wanted his ego massage, as usual.

>>80032920
oops, i meant did direct it.

>>80032946
indeed, but they're the most memorable moments of the film, including the underground chase sequence and ending.

>>80032946
the cuckoo clock speech is the best part. it's very cruel.

>>80032669
>implying the third man is carol reeds best film
no, that is clearly odd man out.
just google and look at the stills, if you havent seen it.