Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: stanley-kubrick.jpg (103KB, 500x435px) Image search:
[Google]
103KB, 500x435px
Why does nobody ever mention the transcendent /theguy/ Stanley Kubrick. His entire filmography is littered with redpill after redpill. His first mainstream success was Spartacus, a film which showed one man rising up against the degeneracy of the establishment and the elites. He followed up his first epic masterpiece of redpilling with Lolita, warning against the dangers of degenerate paedophilia and sexual exploitation. He proceeded to film Dr Strangelove, a redpill against the militarisation of society and the use of propaganda by government in pursuit of either propaganda and ideology. I mean given 9/11 and the Russophbia on display in the MSM it could be argued this film was prophetic. Then he went to 2001: A Space Odyssey, a film that shows humans have been in contact with aliens since the beginnings of our consciousness. Onto A clockwork orange, showing how society ‘treats’ or rather brainwashes those they deem ‘deplorable’, or even ‘disagreeable’. Barry Lyndon is a repudiation of the empirical aspirations of the 17th and 18th century, those choices made by kings and queens as per their ‘divine right’. Viewed allegorically for today and the Russophobic articles spreading through the MSM like a tentacle creature in a hentai. Then the Shining, how ones mind can be manipulated into becoming a psychopath, or becoming placated and peaceful. His next film was Full Metal Jacket, a deeper, more modernistic understanding of the themes explored in Barry Lyndon, corporations and governments still fuck over the common man at every available opportunity. His last film, suspiciously enough, was ‘allegedly’ based upon a Rothschilds party. Eyes Wide Shut shows the extent to which degenerate factions use their wealth and influence to blackmail anyone of influence. Sound familiar?
TLDR Kubrick was based, and fucking smart about it. Anyone who says otherwise is a fucking shill who probably thinks of capeshit and grimdark adaptations are the height of cinema.
>>
>>80003463
>Onto A clockwork orange, showing how society ‘treats’ or rather brainwashes those they deem ‘deplorable’, or even ‘disagreeable’
Anon... no
>>
>>80003522
Anon yes more like. How much do ClearBlue pay you. Shill.
>>
>>80003463
the shining should have been called the shiting, you know, because it's so shit
>>
>>80003577
As the Anon who wrote this I would like to say they mightn't be a shill. They might just be a cunt. Though all shills are cunts, not all cunts are shills.
>>
>>80003463
>Why does nobody ever mention
The thing is, Stanley is discussed constantly here, by fans and non-fans alike. He isn't Bane-tier, but his presence on /tv/ is constant.
>Stanley Kubrick
>Stephen King
>sk
etc.......
>>
>>80003522
It was, but it was about how it doesn't actually work.
Then kubrick found out about trauma induced dissociation
>>
>>80003463
come anon no need to go ballistic over kubrick
the man was legit genius, you're just in /tv/ anybody saying he's a hack does not actually believe it
>>
>>80003463
What the fuck? No fucking mention of The Killing??
>there would be no Pulp Fiction
>>
>Then he went to 2001: A Space Odyssey, a film that shows humans have been in contact with aliens since the beginnings of our consciousness.
How the fuck is this redpill?
>>
>>80003463
he was a talent less hack that should have been a photographer, he was very technical but all his films are devoid of passion and soul.
>>
>>80003463
We talk about Kubrick constantly though.
No one here seriously denies he was a genius of his craft (even those who don't like Kubrick).
You're just preaching to the choir here
>>
>>80003463
Pretty sure Kubrick was against communism. "Russophobia" really dude? Cause the Kremlin and Putin are in no way a fascist regime, right? Only Democratic states imprison peaceful protesters and suppress freedom of expression. Back to /r/thedonald and please keep you and your 8th grade red state education away from any high speed internet connection for the rest of your sad life. Oh yeah and your reference to 'the redpill" is also moronic, the inventors of the metaphor, the waschowskis, are transgender dumbass.
>>
watchpaintdrytv (ID: !lmiigEOhOE)
2017-03-03 03:59:23
Post No.80005679
[Report] Image search: [Google]
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_7594.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3024x4032px
>>80005122
He was "against" belligerent nationalism on all sides. But he wasn't necessarily for or against anything in particular as much as he commented on how people function in different conditions to kind of tell an underlying joke. All of his movies are about societal breakdowns and structural disorder and pretty much all end with a punchline. It was all a joke to him.
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2