>supposed to take place 20 years before the first movie
>he fought in the war in Afghanistan
>there are iPhones, flatscreen TVs, and bluetooths
>>79905360
Very odd. But just like Ta3ken, it's not canon.
Jesus christ, just let the series die.
>>79906062
But there's still so many fences to jump!
>>79905360
damn, i really would have loved some early 90s kino. Plus since he worked at the CIA they could have given him cool gadgets which were really just modern tools but would seem futuristic as fuck. Like a cell phone with a shit load of apps on it. and half inch thick bullet proof armor that could stop rifle rounds. and a cool car that runs on electricity.
>>79905360
I'm making this post, in a thread that clearly has to do with a /tv/ related subject, for no other reason than to test whether I have been banned from /tv/. The reason why I'm doing this, is because I started using /tv/ like an hour ago and despite a lot of shitty/off topic/porn threads as usual, somehow, this time was just too much. so I reported like ten of them at a stroke. I did so fully congnizant that the hot pocket man might ban me for some unrelated reason, just by proxy, but I didn't care.
So that's what this post is for. an out-of-the-way check to see whether I've been baned (heh!) for reporting rule-violating content that I was personally sick of seeing. in the event of success, then perhaps this board somewhat operates like it's supposed to.
>>79905360
Interesting, so it's like Archer. I wonder if the cold war is still on
>>79905360
Oh, you didn't know? The first taken movie took place in 2030
>>79905360
It was decent casting if they wanted a young Liam Neeson. Too bad the screwed it up.
>>79906650
Honestly, I doubt it's on purpose. They probably got confused.
I know I should ignore it and suspend my disbelief, but anochronism can completely take me out of a movie/show.
>>79905360
Seriously? How hard would it have been to set it in the late 80s?