Just finished TNG. What should I watch next?

DS9

>>79801984
DS9

>>79801984
A gun

>>79801984

TAS

>>79802080
>>79802082
Already watched DS9. Does anyone have a Voyager episode guide so I can skip the absolute shit episodes?

>>79801984
Star Trek Undiscovered Country through Nemesis
SG-1
Quantum Leap
DS9
X-Files

>>79802114
Bab5

>>79801984
Battlestar Galactica (both Larson's and Moore's, but you can skip the 1980)

>>79801984
The outside world.

Voyager

Kevin Sorbo's Andromeda

>>79802114
They're all shit, mate.

>>79801984
Something good for a change

>>79801984
Voyager. DS9 isn't proper trek.

>Mounted on the wall in the diner was a small black and white television. We usually arrived at the diner just a few minutes after six o'clock, just as the new science fiction program, Star Trek, was being broadcast. However, I soon discovered that Scientologists watched this program from an entirely different perspective than did "wogs." ("Wog" is the Scientology term for non- Scientologists, taken from an old English expression, a derogatory term used to refer to the non-English natives of the British colonies).

>"It's just old space opera," one staff member joked as we watched an episode. "They don't know it, but they're really just running their own track (time track)." What he meant was that the events on the program were actually real events that had happened long ago. The Star Trek writers were just "remembering" events in their own distant past. Events which were common to us all. To a Scientologist, this program had a special relevance. To us, this program was our history.

The next step is to receive auditing from a trained counselor

>>79803919
actually the next step is to actually explore space yourself

>>79801984
DS9. Then you should start watching anime, because Americans haven't made anything worthwhile since.

>>79801984
DS9
im not even memeing i honestly though TNG was the best until i watch DS9 in full

>>79802114
I hear Janeway tortured some people on the bridge, but I don't know which episode it is.

>>79803919
>getting star wars mixed up with star trek