[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What the fuck is this shit?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 154
Thread images: 13

File: IMG_0897.jpg (71KB, 481x445px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0897.jpg
71KB, 481x445px
What the fuck is this shit?
>>
If you don't like this movie you're racist.

You don't want to be racist, do you?
>>
>>79767476
critics giving them a fresh review otherwise they are racist

welcome to modern america!
>>
>>79767476
Stream?
>>
>>79767476
Let me take a wild guess

Is the timely, clever and relevant social critique this film presents with such clarity and intellect "fuck white people"?
>>
>>79767498
>>79767494
The Triggering Is Real
>>
>>79767476
Maybe it got an 100% because it is good? I don't know though, I try not to judge movies before I watch them
>>
>>79767476
The flaw Rotten Tomatoes is that when you have a 100%, it's really 100% of the critics reviewing it giving the movie a "positive" review. That doesn't mean that they all think that it was the greatest movie of all time, it's just that they all think it surpassed some lesser threshold of goodness.
>>
american remake of an actual good movie
>>
>>79767553
That is true. I saw the movie today and it's a very entertaining movie, it's good. But the 100% led me to believe it might be some kind of masterpiece, my expectations were way too high.

It's a solid horror thriller with a few funny parts and is a lot more straightforward than I expected. The race relations stuff ends up being not that central to the film.
>>
Despite the way it's been marketed the movie is satire and the satire is not "LOL FUCK ALL WHITE PEOPLE" but is making fun of white liberals who are overly eager to get some cool points from the blacks.
>>
>>79767476
Reee black movie rate high REEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
File: chillaton.jpg (5KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]
chillaton.jpg
5KB, 125x125px
>>79767476
casual negroid worship.
>>
100% means 1. none of the critics thought it was shit and 2. armond hasn't reviewed it yet
>>
>>79767617
wait, are you telling me the punchline of this movie is cultural appropriation?
>>
>>79767534
The movie is the result of niggers being triggered that white people exist. Millions of dollars and months of work vs. a few shitposts on 4chan, and guess which one flusters your fanny?
>>
>>79767687
What are you even talking about? You sound schizophrenic dude. Shouldn't you be muttering this while you push a cart down the street
>>
>>79767553

This is the first non-documentary film with over 100 reviews to get a perfect score in eighteen years. Think of all the critically-acclaimed films that have come out in that time. All of them had at least a couple negative reviews.

Sure it's possible that every single critic that reviewed it thought it was just above-average, but with how incredibly rare this is, you would be expecting a masterpiece.
>>
If you don't watch this movie while a black guy fucks your gf beside you you're a nazi.
Nazis get punched.
>>
>>79767670
This anon is correct. Armond has reviewed it and his review is negative but it just hasn't been posted to RT yet. Tomorrow this will read 99%.
>>
>>79767727
>implying the kids from /pol/ have girlfriends
>>
File: gJMl4.jpg (75KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
gJMl4.jpg
75KB, 800x600px
Allow me to explain OP
>>
>>79767700
What? Horseshit. I'm sure that's not true, and not even all the reviews could be in yet. right?
>>
>>79767476

paternalistic racism is good racism
>>
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/445206/jordan-peeles-get-out-trite-get-whitey-movie

THE MADMAN DID IT AGAIN. FUCKING RIP
>>
>>79767845
He's made his entire career out of being the only guy who hates good movies. No one would even know who he was otherwise. His reviews are boring as fuck.
>>
>>79767832
It's not true

Plenty of 100s on RT

However, they are currently ranking Get Out as the 56th greatest movie of all time

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/
>>
>>79767832

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_with_a_100%25_rating_on_Rotten_Tomatoes

Only the second ever to do it besides Toy Story 2. Now it looks like based Armond is going to knock it out of 100% territory, but it's still a pretty historic achievement.

>>79767889

>with over 100 reviews
>>
>>79767815
tyronhe is not buying that shit tho
>>
>>79767888
triggered niggered
>>
>>79767889
There's also the matter of how recently the film was released. It determines how many critics will review the film. Get Out (2017) receives 131 reviews, but Frankenstein (1931) only gets 45. They're both at 100%, and Frankenstein is probably the better movie, but because Frankenstein is older and critics don't care to review older movies en masse, there's a skew toward newer movies.
>>
>>79767978
Are you seriously gonna sit here and tell me I'm wrong? Did you read that review?
>no one will
>>
>>79767918
>https://www.rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/
damn, and I thought IMDB 250 top films were a piece of utter garbage
>>
>>79767476
>Key & Peele LOL

This happened because of people in their 20's.
>>
>>79767982
I will say this, though.

Finding Nemo is at 62, with 99%. Is Get Out really better than Finding Nemo? I mean I haven't seen Get Out but Finding Nemo is a goddamn classic.
>>
Nigger makes movie about (((whites))) sucking up to him

(((whites))) end up sucking up to him irl
>>
>>79768000
you are still a triggered niggered
>>
File: IMG_3128.png (236KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3128.png
236KB, 480x800px
>100%
>WERE DEFINITELY NOT SHILLING GUYS ITS REALLY THAT GOOD AND IF YOU DONT THINK SO TOO YOURE A NAZI BTW

This is the same reason Marvel gets such high scores. I don't believe "critics" anymore than I believed the election poll (((projections))).
>>
>>79768119
Lots of black and interracial movies get terrible reviews. The reason this one got good reviews is that it's a solid entertaining movie with good actors and a good script.
>>
Just saw the movie. It's stupid.
>>
>>79768119
tits are not the same as testicles, you realize that don't you, you lil bitch?

I agree with you on the shilling stuff tho
>>
>>79768173
Damn this movie was BTFO by that post!
>>
>>79768165
It's just more anti-white than the rest of them.
>>
>>79768209
Is it? The white people turn out to be voodoo cult members. Do you think the movie is suggesting that all white people are voodoo cult members? Or is it just unacceptable to ever portray any white people as voodoo cult members, lest it offend your delicate sensibilities?
>>
>Am I the only conservative that didn't miss the point of the movie. I went into it having read the above review, with very low expectations. This movie for all it's flaws is an assault on colorblind liberal elitism. The white liberals in the movie turn the black character into a commodity, are dis-genuine, and generally patronizing (sound familiar). In the end they care nothing about him and just want his body (or vote). As a white person I wasn't offended, or even in tune with the white people in this movie. This film mocks a very specific sub group of people that I share very little in common with.. Huh I think the reviewer is just kind of out touch with satire.
>>
>>79767476
>give negative review
>get called a racist
>lose job and get death threats
>fresh: 131 rotten: 0

In the culture we live in, is it really worth the risk?
>>
>>79767733
>Armond has reviewed it and his review is negative
yo fuck that house nigga, his review shouldnt count. crabs in a bucket man
>>
>>79768183
It's just a funny pic bro take a breath.
>>
>>79768235
f-fuck off tumblr! w-we aren't just as bad as you I swear!
>>
>>79767733
Armond praised Man of Steel. Fuck him
>>
It was THE movie of the century. It exposes the true nature of white people: they are envious of the superior culture and genetics of black people. The only """people""" who hate this movie are /pol/tards white males who are afraid that they've been found out.
>>
>>79768305
Trying too hard anon.
>>
>>79768235
Can you find me any film on Rotten Tomatoes about an evil voodoo cult without the racial slant that's rated at 100%?
>>
so is it worth seeing?
>>
>>79768267
Dude, this act was fresh back when Django came out. We all know what we're going to get now.
>>
>>79767815
Tyrone looks like he ain't having any of that shit
>>
>>79768371
I enjoyed it but the 100% on RT had my expectations set too high. It's an entertaining horror/thriller.
>>
>>79768267
Fuck off retard. Nobody ever criticized liberal zealots of screeching, they criticized what they were screeching about.

Please do the world a favor and kill yourself already
>>
>>79767558

What the fuck are you on about? It's not a remake of anything.
>>
Why do /pol/ care so much?
>>
File: critic.jpg (22KB, 300x279px) Image search: [Google]
critic.jpg
22KB, 300x279px
>>79767476
Can he save us?
>>
>>79768423
Cause that black dude in the trailer has a hot girlfriend and they don't have a hot girlfriend in their trailer.
>>
>>79768423
>anonymous shitposts on 4chan
vs.
>millions of dollars and months of work
>>
>>79768440
Yeah his review is negative, it just hasn't been posted to RT yet.
>>
It was definitely not a bad movie, but it doesn't deserve a 100%. Just finished watching it. It felt just a cut above made for TV movie. Solid, but not a masterpiece. Acting was good though. Story throws sort of a twist but nothing revolutionary.
>>
>>79768423
Why would the most paranoid board care about their conspiracy theories getting proven true?

The critic reviews for this movie are absurd, no sane person can argue against the obvious narrative and agenda being pushed.
>>
>>79768481
But, they can, because it's a good movie, and lots of other black/interracially themed movies have gotten terrible reviews. So your premise makes zero fucking sense.
>>
>>79767928
>da fuk am I spozed tuh do wit flowaz? I got Kidz n shieeet...
>>
>>79768479
That's the weakness of RT. If a movie is just good, but it's liked by pretty much everyone, like a solid B or even a C+, it gets a really high % score. There's the rating out of 10 but I don't really understand how it's calculated and no one pays any attention to it.
>>
File: 1486082186084.jpg (906KB, 2544x4000px) Image search: [Google]
1486082186084.jpg
906KB, 2544x4000px
>>79767815
This picture never gets old
>>
>>79768559
I haven't watched it so I won't say it's good or bad, but if you have watched it, do you really think it is worthy of a 100% rating?

A literal perfect movie?
>>
>>79767553
>>79767700
Its not going to stay that way, as already pointed out reviews from Armond always count towards the tomatometer and he thought it was race baiting bullshit. Thats not to say it is, just to say why the fuck do you people care about a number on a fucking website selling shitty ads to you. I get reading film crit because some people have interesting interpretations, but why does it matter if get out has 100 or 60 percent. Are you going to base your own enjoyment off of what a bunch of autistic white people think? Oh wait of course you all are because this is 4chan and you dont know how to get validation anywhere else.
>>
>scene in the trailer where the main black guy offers another one a fist bump and the other one shakes his hand
>Voice over: "There's something very wrong with this town"
You're retarded if you couldn't see this is satirical
>>
>>79767494
Lmao seek help
>>
>>79768616
I think it's a good movie with broad appeal which translates into a high score on RT. I liked it. I didn't think it was amazing. My expectations were way too high. It's a well-done horror thriller with some funny parts and a couple of good twists.
>>
>>79767918
What the fuck happened in 2012? I don't get it.
>>
File: shitto.jpg (236KB, 664x720px) Image search: [Google]
shitto.jpg
236KB, 664x720px
>Trailer looks interesting
>Looks like a decent thriller flick, I'll give it a watch
>Maybe they'll be some decent threads on /tv/ afterwards
>Reviews come out
>Overwhelming positive to a ridiculous degree
>/tv/ has to be contrarian no matter what
>No discussion will ever be allowed without someone bringing up BLM or some SJW bullshit
>>
>>79768656
Whoever made the movie cared way the fuck more than anyone on 4chan, though. Why are you on the /tv/ board caring about the fact that other people are posting things you don't like?
>>
>>79768559
I'm not aware of another "black" movie that has come out after the media went full anti-white anti-trump.

Sorry anon, you live in a post Trump world and leftists and liberals are going to continue to ruin everything with virtue signaling like these reviews.
>>
IT'S
FUCKING
S A T I R E
A
T
I
R
E
>>
>>79768735
Yeah, no. It's just a good movie that the reviewers liked. Your bubble of paranoia where everything revolves around your simpleton red-team-vs-blue-team politics doesn't have anything to do with it.
>>
File: Tarantula.jpg (174KB, 1023x537px) Image search: [Google]
Tarantula.jpg
174KB, 1023x537px
>>79768721
>movies and the people making them are overtly politcal
>get triggered that people react to the politics of movies and the people making them instead of just passively accepting them
>>
>>79768000
I read it and much like the moonlight review I thought it interesting. Armond has a unique position to comment on race and sexual identity. His dissenting opinions usually come out of his own conservative religious upbringing. This doesn't make his opinion wrong, it makes it interesting. Pauline Kael famously hated beloved movies too because of her perspective. If you really care what over 100 white people had to say more than another black man, then are you really that better than the fucking white people in the movie. The irony is smacking me in the face with its dick
>>
>>79768789
That's clearly what things revolve around for Hollywood though. Celebrities can't go a single award ceremony without throwing several fits about Trump.
>>
>>79768721
Sucks. Same thing happened to 12 Years a Slave. Great movie that /pol/ is eternally butthurt at.
>>
>>79768711
the last dying gasps of the entertainment industry's imagination.
>>
File: o-ALLISON-WILLIAMS-facebook[1].jpg (278KB, 2000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
o-ALLISON-WILLIAMS-facebook[1].jpg
278KB, 2000x1000px
Couple of non-political thoughts on this movie:

Allison Williams is a cute. Her girl next door was perfect and I think we'll see her in other things.

Daniel Kaluuya did a flawless American accent. I was wondering if he could pull that off after seeing him in Black Mirror with the thick London accent, and after Benedict Cumbersnatch fucked it all up in Doctor Strange.

Peele is not in the movie which is good, it would have been distracting.
>>
>>79768856
Really? 12 Years a Slave didn't seem to get much /pol/ attention as I recall. Certainly nothing on the level of what Django or Birth of a Nation did.
>>
>>79768793
Quentin Tarantino isn't just a cuck, hes a cucklord. The guys almost militant in his push for cuck porn.
>>
>>79768759
y-yeah anon

>all white people are secretly racist
>all white people are unintentionally racist and they don't know it!
>cops don't help blacks!
>black people are "forced" to hide their true personality around white people because of the mentioned secret racism.

It's LITERALLY the equivalent of MTV race baiting videos you stupid fucks

If you can't see the OBVIOUS agenda in the movie you're stupid as fuck and should never fucking come back.
>>
>>79768789
Hmm yes surely a racial movie staring a black man just happened to be the best movie ever, in the climate where the media is pushing the narrative that white people are all racist KKK neo-nazis.
>>
>>79768725
I go on here and other boards to be exposed to other things I havent heard of because 4chan is actually one of the best places to not experience fucking echochambers that web 2.0 has created everywhere else on the internet. Thats why I think its sad that you all want to turn it into another one without substantively discussing dissenting viewpoints. It's a well made film, no question, and it's likely coming from a personal place close to Jordan Peele's heart, and I felt that in the movie. But much like moonlight with its weird lack of sensuality, I found parts of this to be too contrived to really suck me in at points. At the same time, I do think there's value in making films that portray black people in weak, scared, presentations, but automatically praising something because its black or gay is insulting to both. Like really, dude was so hung up over one handjob he was never ever doing anything ever again. Yeah, thats a real person.
>>
>>79768962
that's fucking hilarious dude
>>
>>79768968

The agenda of the movie was to call out virtue signaling liberals for how they approach blacks.

If the people in the movie were actually racist they wouldn't bother trying to "use" the main character like they did. And the cops weren't helping because they were on the antagonists payroll, not because they were cops.
>>
>>79767698
nigger
>>
>>79769003
Yeah if you read the reviews they don't say it was "the best movie ever" they just say it was good. The only time I see the narrative of white people being racist neo-nazis is when I read /pol/ and comments sections infested by kids from /pol/ who are in fact racist neo-nazis. But it's cute how you blame it all on some media conspiracy. We both know damn well what the truth is.
>>
>>79769051
>has not seen the movie
>>
>>79768592
>implying tyronhe would take care of his kids
>>
>>79768863
Daniel did a good job. His acting was top notch. His character was written really well and he executed it perfectly.

Through the entire movie I was saying "that's how I would have reacted desu to a similar situation."
>>
>>79769051
Dude, the other guy is right. It's not actually what you think.
>>
>>79767918
Wow. I'm a fucking loser, I don't even recognize most of the titles on that list.
>>
>>79767700
>Sure it's possible that every single critic that reviewed it thought it was just above-average, but with how incredibly rare this is, you would be expecting a masterpiece.

See, I disagree with that. I think films that earn the masterpiece branding tend to engage the viewer's emotions/intellect/value system to an extent that they're just going to rub some the wrong way. This is pretty cynical, but I think the majority of people are fucking idiots, so unless a bunch of them hate something, I wouldn't expect it to have that masterpiece-level impact.
>>
>>79769142

No, its reversed. It would be easy to say its just another all white people are racist movie. Its targeted at a specific group. Whats hilarious is the majority don't fucking realize it. They're slapping 100% reviews on it when its directly talking shit about them.
>>
>>79769078
You're a stupid dickhead. Most internet nazis are not real, kids or white.
They are stupid third world shitposting scum like hues.
>>
>>79769189
I've put in more than my share of time on /pol/ and I know that's not true.
>>
>>79769188
>Im so smart that my review on 4chan can see through something that 100% of professional reviewers were oblivious too

I don't even think 1st year film students are this up their own ass, so I'm guessing you were rejected or are in the first half of high school
>>
Random question if anyone knows: at one point in the movie 911 is dialed but then the phone is hung up. That happens in movies all the time. Don't the cops trace your location and send a car to check on a 911 hangup call?
>>
>>79769188
I see your point. Yeah, it does bait in liberals and then delivers something they're not expecting. I hate to call it genius, but its defiantly pretty smart
>>
>>79769241
No yo don't you have no fucking clue just projecting your own prejudice onto anonymous people.
You are like the dumb bitch troll expert that said most trolls are white men but she had no proof.
>>
>>79769288
I see, so in reality /pol/ is full of tolerant, reasonable, non-racist people, but in your view, unfortunately they are being slandered by a bunch of people from 3rd world countries posting pretending to be white racist Trump voters. Is that what you're saying? Because I gotta tell you, that is some fake moon landing flat earth level conspiracy shit right there.
>>
>>79769321
Why do you assume people that rant about jews and blacks are white? On an ANONYMOUS message board full of proxies and weeb nazis.
You know in asian countries they dont have the same stigma towards nazism the west?
Furthermore arabs, south american et al are all known to have anti-semitic and neonazi subcultures.
Face facts by saying /pol/ is full of white racist kids you are being a prejudiced pig.
>>
>>79769391
Because they are always white

Asians care about Asia. Same with Arabs caring about the middle east and south American's caring about South America.
>>
I went to this movie today and the theater had just been refit with DOLBY vision (whatever that is). It looked and sounded okay. But, weird part was, every seat was assigned, which was awkward for a shut-in like me with no movie friends. They tried to seat me right next to some couple even though most of the theater was empty because it was the 11 AM show.

Is that a new normal thing, for theaters to do reserved seating all the time? Seems like a shit idea.
>>
>>79769428
>always
Wtf do you even mean by this? Have you seen everyone that posts on this site? You do not know. Period. You dumb racist.
>>
>>79767476
>dude white genocide lmao
Who here holds an advanced degree?
>>
>>79769428
>Because they are always white
In an alternate timeline where HWNDU never happened, maybe.
>>
>>79769440

More theaters are moving to the "luxury cinema" model with reserved seating, recliner chairs, dinner service, etc. Millennials won't go to theaters anymore unless there's a gimmick.
>>
>>79769440
Same thing happened here as well.
I went to see this film with my stepson's mother and even though we bought our tickets together they assigned me to the far back and put her next to some 6'6" black man.
The flick was pretty decent but my gf kept dropping her phone and bending over to pick it up, so she said she didn't catch much of it
>>
>>79769561
I'm supposed to go to an evening showing at the same theater for Logan next week with an actual other human being. I'm not looking forward to the late arriving people trying to figure out what seat they're supposed to be in during the movie.

That thing where they serve food during the movie, so distracting. I do like the theaters that let you have a beer, that's nice.
>>
>>79769646
S P I C I E S T
>>
Next big hollywood movie will be called "White genocide" and will revolve around innocent black resistance fighters killing and raping white people.
The very last line after the last white person is killed will be "we dindu nuffin
It will be 100% approved by critics.
>>
>>79770169
>The black man in the trailer had a pretty girlfriend and my trailer is just me and my mom
>>
>>79767733
based armond

truly /ourguy/
>>
>>79770244
I'm not sure that's something you should be proud of, but okay.
>>
Canonically the best film ever produced in human history. And it was made by a black man. Who married a white woman. /tv/ and /pol/ will NEVER recover from this. EVER.
>>
>>79767815
>Tyronhe and Danisha's faces
>>
>>79770291
i'm not sure you should be here, fagtron.

back to >>>/r/eddit
>>
>Critics heap praise onto a movie that's openly race-baiting about how evil whitey is
Shocker
Also any piece of shit movie can get a 100% rotten tomatoes score the day of release
>>
>>79770415
Except it doesn't do that. You obviously haven't seen the movie. You're just triggered because that black dude has a cute girly and you have none.
>>
>>79770412
People from plebbit always say this.
>>
File: poltriggered.png (912KB, 549x951px) Image search: [Google]
poltriggered.png
912KB, 549x951px
>>79767476
>>79767494
>>79767498
>>79767687
>>79767815
gotcha
>>
White guilt.


Based Armond will lower the rating
>>
>>79767918
The Birth of A Nation 100%? Seriously? You'd think one guy would be like 'Movie is about KKK, well its reprehensible but 2 stars'?
>>
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/445206/jordan-peeles-get-out-trite-get-whitey-movie

Truly /our guy/
>>
>>79768462
Wow. What if they refuse to include it to keep its 100? /pol/ would literally explode and MAYBE we could actually get a REEEE riot out of them.

Not that I would actually be cheering this don't get me wrong but it would be possibly ebin and better than Gamergate.
>>
>>79770756
He's been kicked off of RT before but I don't know the details of why or why they brought him back.
>>
>>79767476

>white guilt film critics get movie to 100% RT score
>gay black man writing for a conservative magazine is the one to ruin it

Pottery
>>
>>79771241
Is Armond a top or a bottom?
>>
File: 1469579343531.jpg (6KB, 222x225px) Image search: [Google]
1469579343531.jpg
6KB, 222x225px
>/pol/ actually recognizes that this movie is directed by jordan peele and is a satire on liberal bleeding hearts
>/tv/ thinks its a token oscar bait nigflick
every time
>>
>>79771511
>Oscar bait
>released in Feb
what are you even talking about anon
>>
>>79767476
>What the fuck is this shit?

If you give it a bad score, you're clearly a racist.
>>
>>79771660
yes /tv/ is this stupid, you figured it out.

Quite possibly the lowest average IQ on all of 4chan
>>
>>79767476
>hollywood liberal: dude i love black people lmao
>4chan /pol/erina: dude i hate black people lmao
thanks for activating my almonds guys
>>
>>79771706
how many times do you need to make the same post in this thread?
>>
>>79767617
That would make sense, EXCEPT that it wasn't white liberals who were trying hard to be black, but the old white conservatives who want everything, i.e. better bodies, longer life.
>>
File: tmp_7622-14874171859212100452632.png (939KB, 4383x2382px) Image search: [Google]
tmp_7622-14874171859212100452632.png
939KB, 4383x2382px
>>79771725
Not like those geniuses over at /pol/ amirite
>>
>>79771804
>pol at 94

has to be fake, the average there is atleast 80.
>>
>>79771804
>a board full of 3rd world niggers who want to be white
>having an iq that high
i dont think so jim
>>
>>79771828
94 meets your criterion of "at least 80"
>>
>>79767698
Noget killed>>79768235
White porple havr their own iccilt. Ghere are not white booodoos.
>>
>>79771880
i meant as 80 or below.
>>
>>79771804
>board filled with pedos and film snobs that spew memes has the highest IQ
kek
>>
File: elite.jpg (67KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]
elite.jpg
67KB, 960x540px
>>79771804
WHO /SP/ HERE?
>>
>>79772160
You realize that those are only currently here because of the /pol/ tards invading our board, right?
Thread posts: 154
Thread images: 13


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.