Where were you, when IMDB proved it was superior to Rotten Tomatoes?

File: 1465596019650.jpg (69KB, 560x440px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 560x440px

>>79728422
>go on IMDb
>rate it 1 star

IMDB genuinely is better than RT, the critics RT uses are shitcunts

>>79728422
i was sat at home

>>79728422
you think IMDB knows anything about THE GREATEST MOVIE EVER MADE

>>79728466
>become "official" movie reviewer
>rate it 10 stars

How is this any different?

they're both shit

>>79728559
Getting a job at a major publication is a bit harder than making an IMDb account.

RT gets points for effort.

>>79728518
message board is kill

>>79728594
Lots of those people who review movies on IMDb also have jobs. Some which are considerably more intellectual and hands-on than being some movie reviewer.

>>79728710
Just because you're knowledgeable of discipline A doesn't mean you have anything worthwhile to say about discipline B.

If that were the case then people would still be listening to Noam Chomsky.

>>79728422
Have you seen it OP?

Also imdb is usually just people who go and rate something 1 star that they haven't seen for whatever stupid reason. In this case, an interracial couple is in it.

>>79728769
>If that were the case then people would still be listening to Noam Chomsky.
He literally the most frequently cited living intellectual on the planet.

>>79728637
no

>>79728769
My point is that just because you're studied in discipline A, doesn't inherently mean that it voids all other opinions on the subject if they aren't equally studied in it. I don't need a degree in gender studies to call bullshit when I see it, just like I don't have to have a useless film theory degree to call out a movie for being overrated.

>>79728868
>Have you seen it OP?

>the "I-I-I-IT'S NOT REALLY RACIST, IT'S SUBVERTING THE RACIST STEREOTYPE!" argument

No, it's racist. The movie revolves around the concept of cultural appropriation where upper-class liberals steal black peoples bodies because its cool, and hip.

File: 1459943144530.png (9KB, 370x236px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 370x236px

>over 50% of the votes are either a 10/10 or a 1/10

Nice site.

>>79729062
this is what user reviews are tho, people either hate something or love something only true intellectuals can see past it all and find a middle ground

File: Armond White[1].jpg (83KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 600x900px

>>79728422
How long until he delivers the killing blow to the perfect rating of this flick, and proves once and for all how pleb all other movie reviewers are?

>>79729121
It'll be a little while. He's got to find a way to position Trump into his reviews alongside Obama and 9/11.

>>79729109
Or they haven't seen it.

>>79728422
say hello to next year's oscar darling

>>79728422
it's always been better, even now with the message boards being gone.

>>79729008
It might be racist, but I'm not going to accuse a movie of being racist before I actually watch it.

>>79729121
Wouldn't he be praising it for making fun of what his fellow basketball americans think?

>>79729259
>but I'm not going to accuse a movie of being racist before I actually watch it

So have you seen Birth of a Nation?

File: 980x.jpg (80KB, 980x552px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 980x552px

grill is pretty

>>79728875
and you?

Going to see this with my wife's son tomorrow. Is it good?

>>79728422
I don't care how famous he gets he will always be Parking Pataweyo to me. The thought of him fucking a white girl out of badness would crack me up throughout the movie.

File: Untitled.png (118KB, 567x523px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 567x523px

>imdb
>reliable

>>79729407
>So have you seen Birth of a Nation?
I'm assuming the silent film? I haven't seen it (nor the 2016 one) but I still would want to judge it myself and also consider historical context.

But I never said that was racist?

File: mbts.jpg (18KB, 212x194px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 212x194px

>>79729062

Manchester by the Sea ratings on Amazon are the same way