Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: deadpool_green_lantern_by_xxdan_the_manxx-d4761u1.jpg (95KB, 900x546px) Image search:
[Google]
95KB, 900x546px
Deadpool w/R rating
>Budget: $58 million
>Box office: $783.1 million
Suicide Squad w/PG-13
>Budget: $175 million
>Box office: $745.6 million
So not only did Deadpool do better at the box office with a FUCKING R RATING, it had an overall wider profit margin than Suishit Squad
DCucks utterly and totally BTFO
>>
>Movie about Superman makes 688 milion at box office
>Unknown "villains" movie beat it
>BvS makes 873 million at box office
>Batman only adds 185 million to it
>Dark Knight grossing over a billion
DC fans ae the Zack Snyder of fans, except that they aren't even selfaware
>>
I chock it up more to FOX than DC incompetence. DC is still shit though don't get me wrong.
>>
>>79704439
>one had a china release
>the other didn't.
>>
>>79704887
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Why-Deadpool-Has-Been-Banned-China-106557.html
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/deadpool-denied-release-china-due-856627
Really makes you hmmmmm
>>
>>79704439
And they both beat Doctor Strange
>>
>>79704920
>Doctor Strange minus China Box office, 566 mil
I thought the MCU was popular?
>>
>>79704972
It is. It was an underhyped movie with little advertising and it still got that much money. Seems good to me.
>>
>>79705301
>It was an underhyped movie with little advertising
Is that what you tell yourself? It was less popular in the US than Sing
>>
>>79704439
they both profited. so what's wrong?
>>
what ss made a profit?
/TV/ BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1