Are deleted scenes considered canon?

depends on the movie. If they were cut because of time constraints like with LoTR and are referenced in the same that made the theatrical cut, then yeah I'd assume they're canon. If they're cut because it doesn't make sense in the film and its never referenced again then it wouldn't be canon.

>>79693663
depends on the film
sometimes

>>79693762
this basically

>>79693762
>LOTR films
>cannon
You are severely retarded.

>>79693663
Good question, would anyone like to answer it?

>>79693663
depends from movie to movie you underage piece of shit

It was in Anchorman.

>>79693762
this

and for an example of the latter in that post, the deleted scenes of Wong Kar Wai's In the Mood For Love makes it explicit that Chow and Su consummated their affair while the film as released makes it ambiguous at best (and i think it leans more toward their love remaining unrequited, which works better for the movie imo, being perhaps the most aching romance ever on film)

Any movie with a "cannon" (i.e. meaning sequels and spinoffs) has a 99% chance of being garbage.

There is the incredibly rare exception like the Godfather 2.

>>79693762
This.
>>79693879

kys.

File: atheism.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

Some deleted scenes improve the entire film

File: 1334072889799.png (214KB, 1256x1075px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1256x1075px

Are deleted Jews considered human?

>>79694009
>Unbearable-to-watch deleted scene is better than anything without Farrell in this movie
Bravo!

File: giphy.gif (2MB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x280px

>>79693944

>>79693879
The irony in your post exceeds all levels of embarrassment

>>79694338
>posting a literal tumblr gif

>>79694357
LOTR films haven't created a cannon you drooling autistic retard.

>>79693663
>>79693880
>>79694365
>Implying oldfags still post

>>79694365
Google images