Literally nothing can top this. Masterpiece

>>79685639
no ones going to reply to this thread

its true though

>>79685639
4k blu ray when?

>>79685639
2010 was better

>a mechanical view of mechanical things and mechanical men made by a mechanical man using a mechanical camera

>>79685639
Tree of Life does a better job of making no sense.

LANDSCAPE

>>79686446
what do you mean by that?

>>79686460
get the fuck out kiddo

One word: Solaris

>>79686446
It's not about machines, it's about technology having a severe impact in our lives to the point we are losing our identity as human beings.

>>79685639
The only downside i can think of might be the FIRST time you watch it.

>>79686382
wasn't there a 70mm Scan IMAX release?

>>79685639
Utterly boring. So much cinematic wankery makes for a movie that doesn't actually entertain, it just showcases the effort that went into production.

For all intents and purposes it really is the king of kino.

>>79686539
tell me how much merch of bb-8 do you have?

>>79686603
None, that was shit too but not because it was boring.

>>79686603
A beenie and a small figure

>>79685639
Ah yes, the original dude weed movie.

>>79686489
>>79686518
It's an extremely cold and mechanical movie shot by a man who is a walking machine of cold perfect geometry.

>>79687097
what does that even mean?

Wouldnt watch this shit again for $500

File: Aragorn_and_army_of_dead.jpg (64KB, 800x351px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 800x351px

>>79685639
you forgot the ascended knio

>>79685639
Literally nothing can make me go to sleep quicker

>>79687180
There is not one moment of humanity or emotion in the movie

>>79686651
t. ADHD

>>79686522
>wasn't there a 70mm Scan IMAX release?
there is a 70mm print as the PCC are showing it, but they need to stick that shit on a bluray

GOAT SCI-FI MOVIES

1. 2001
2. The Matrix
3. Day the Earth Stood Still
4. Gattaca
5. Moon
6. The Terminator
7. Minority Report
8. A.I
9. Sunshine
10.Total Recall

File: 12234851_916646091749949_8699431756853281091_n.jpg (80KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 600x800px

> I truly enjoy this movie, over the year i've aquired a very fine taste for kino
> plebs need to get on this level, enjoyement is for the lesser minded.
> please think im special

Such a fucking pretentious movie, I enjoyed the pretty colours tho.

I saw hundreds of movies but nothing ever came close to 2001.

File: 1472394993502.png (114KB, 305x382px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 305x382px

>>79686460
>Tree of Life makes no sense
>2001 makes no sense

>>79686515
2001 is superior to Solaris in every way

>>79687360
is this supposed to be criticism?

>>79688616
>2001 is superior to Solaris in every way
Only because we never got a decent adaptation of Lem's work.
Lem should be another Philip K. Dick in the adaptation department.

>>79685639
>Grand Prix
>Ben-Hur
>Lawrence of Arabia

All good contenders.

>>79688616
>is this supposed to be criticism
Movies need emotion or else they're a slideshow

>>79686424
Is 2010 worth watching as someone who loved 2001?

>>79689866
It's shit but it explains some things from 2001

File: metropolis.jpg (125KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1000x1500px

I prefer the first cyperpunk movie ever made

What are the themes of this movie?

>>79688616
2001 movie>Solaris movie
Solaris book>2001 book

File: mpv-shot0002 (7).jpg (107KB, 1280x540px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1280x540px

>>79688616
>>79688677
>>79690368
>2001 better than solaris
>mfw

its too fucking slow for me, I feel asleep twice the first time I watched it.

>>79690368
Well, tell us why Solaris it's better

>>79690415
I meant

File: Madness.jpg (12KB, 331x380px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 331x380px

Seriously though, the only movie that I think surpasses this is the 1996 Hamlet film starring Kenneth Branagh. That film made me feel an attunement with all of humanity before me, so I'd say it's better or that it's at least a tie.

>>79690769
God, everything flows so fucking well. Every camera movement, every motion in the frame. Kubrick was a genius.

>>79688353
>No Bladerunner
>No Alien

File: neck kino.webm (3MB, 900x375px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 900x375px

>>79685639
>Literally nothing can top this
Wrong.

>>79688353
>Terminator, not T2
>No District 9
>no alien
>no blade runner
>a bunch of movies heavily based upon just jerking off about effects

>>79691909
>Gattaca
>Jerking off about effects

pls

>>79690889
speaking of making no sense.

Don't get me wrong, 2001 is (mostly) a beautifully done film, I love the sets, the flow, the camera angles, but Kubrick screwed it up by changing the conclusive ending of the book to the film's ambiguous ending, making it just feel like he wanted to dick around with effects more than anything else.

I am a pleb though.

>>79685639
Aaaaw. Baby's first "patrician" film.

>>79691909
>T2 is better than Terminator

Go back to /r/MCU

>>79690856
>Bladerunner
meh
> Alien
thats mostly horror

>>79692144
I haven't seen a marvel film except deadpool since 2013.

>>79689393
Youre talking out of your fucking ass you pretentious weeb. Theres a difference between precision and attention to detail and "mechanical-ness".


Obsession, dedication and craftsmanship are all human qualities and all reflect a certain aspect of the human condition, beyond that this movie takes risks that are epitome of the human spirit. To experiment, to be bold, to be daring are all reflective of a human auteur. Your favourite director could never, in a million years, have thought of something so beautiful as the final sequence of this film. Quit film you fag.

>>79688353
>Sunshine
>not Soalris

Why dono't put Event Horizon too then?

also
>no Arrival

>>79685639
It's got flaws you can drive a moon buggy through.

For those who don't get it, THE WHOLE HAL 9000 PLOT IS IRRELEVANT FILLER.

This anon gets it:>>79686424

>>79685639
The monolithvrepresents the mystery of life, both terrifying and mesmerizing, we then try to integrate it, become it or whatever, which happens in the end when humanity dies and is reborn as something else, (cosmic foetus). It's an alazing movie, it only talks about things that are always present, it doesn't point to anything outside of the collective experience. Shabzwaba

>>79693878
But none of that has anything to do with the characters or story and conveys no emotion. Saying that something is good just because you crafted something shiny? Purely the most shallow way of approaching film. And as to the final sequence, it too is a sterile series of images with no emotional impact whatsoever aside from dudebro pseuds like you to go "Wow so creative, man" while everyone else sits there and goes "It's pretty, but is it art?"

>>79695240
oh my gosh no. It's about how the structure, how the film was made on a meta level which ADDS meaning, not detracts, but adds meaning to the film.

Consider the nature of science, consider what the film is trying to say about humanity, about our ideology post enlightenment, then think about what kubrick is doing through a meticoulous, objective method to filmmaking. Through sprase dialouge, through the juxtaposition of art music and the cold emptiness of space. Had anyone attempted that before? It's so mind bogglingly brilliant I cant even think of how he came up with it.

Like Marshall McLuhan said "the media is the message". Just because a film does not follow a certain style of filmmaking with extensive dialouge talking about their feels and shit doesn't make it "inhuman".

>>79695545
>extensive dialouge talking about their feels and shit
I never said that once
You can convey emotion through images
Kubrick didn't though, he's a robot.

File: b79fe2d51a0b366a7108fcacb073337a.jpg (340KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1920x1080px

>>79696073
have you even seen the movie or are you just memeing?

>>79696170
It's such a cold empty movie. The "shocked stares" don't evoke any emotion, and the long shots of sterile empty space and the spaceship are ONLY impressive on a technical level. Kubrick was a better photographer than a filmmaker.

>>79694863
>The monolithvrepresents the mystery of life

Huh. Looks like you're wrong on both the literal and figurative representations in the movie. Try again.

>>79696238
quit film.

>>79696284
Kubrick should have.

His contemporaries were better.

>>79690889

Quin really thinned out

File: Scifi.jpg (412KB, 1500x750px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 1500x750px

>>79685639

File: kubrickQuotes.jpg (60KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 850x400px

>>79685639

File: Moonchild.gif (39KB, 216x330px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 216x330px

> tfw Arthur C Clarke was a paedophile living in Sri Lanka sodomizing young children

File: MoonChild.jpg (73KB, 500x293px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x293px

>>79698490
MOONCHILD
M O O N C H I L D

File: oblivion-ANUS.jpg (131KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1440x900px

>>79698512


> Tipped off about the story, the Sunday Mirror sent Mr Johnson to Colombo, where he extracted an confession from the author(Clarke) that he paid boys for sex. "I have never had the slightest interest in children – boys or girls. They should be treated in the same way. But once they have reached the age of puberty, then it is OK," Mr Clarke was quoted as saying in the Sunday Mirror. "If the kids enjoy it and don't mind it doesn't do any harm … there is a hysteria about the whole thing in the West."

>>79685639
>Literally nothing can top this.
>Masterpiece
pic related

File: Scarabaeidae_-_Scarabaeus_sacer.jpg (230KB, 1024x769px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1024x769px

>>79698710

>>79698777
Holy shit balls