RIP

>>79652510
Works fine fit me

>>79652533
L-I-A-R

File: Ben-Affleck-esta-muy-quemado-con-Batman_landscape.jpg (70KB, 600x434px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x434px

>>79652510
>go on site
>every message board is gone
>leave site after saying "FUCK YOU" out loud

>mfw I forgot to screencap all the funny troll posts
REEEEEEEEEE NOW I WILL NEVER GET TO READ THEM AGAIN

I trusted them more than you reddit fucksticks. IT'S NOT FAIR

>>79652582
IMDB had comfy threads like100 things we learned from "..."

File: s-l1600 (5).jpg (125KB, 1600x1071px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1600x1071px

IT WASN'T MEANT TO BE LIKE THIS

>can't read bait threads anymore
why lads

after watching a movie there were like 40 threads already of discussion and commentary/analysis trolling/ now NOTHING JUST NOTHING

WELCOME TO THE END

PLEASE INPUT YOUR ID

YOUR FULL NAME WILL BE DISPLAYED

YOU MAY GIVE A "LIKE" OR NOT, BUT THERE IS NO "DISLIKE"

File: 1388764294459.jpg (93KB, 294x295px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 294x295px

>was hoping it was just a prank bro HA HA XD
>it's really gone
>mfw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Brj8d5HKpEs

>>79652591
HOLY FUCK

THOSE THREADS ARE NOW GONE

File: IMDBFUCK.png (26KB, 944x224px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 944x224px

>try to copy an old IMDB board link I had saved in a word document
>get this instead

I already keep forgetting. I've already gone there half a dozen times today to scroll down and read regular poster's opinions on a movie or actor, but nope. It's leaving me with a feeling of dissatisfaction and emptiness.

File: Dead Inside.png (432KB, 557x426px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 557x426px

DEAD INSIDE
MY HEART AND SOUL FLATLINES
PUT YOUR MOUTH OVER MINE
AND BRING ME BACK TO LIFE

DEAD INSIDE
NO OTHER SATISFIES
MY BLOOD RUNS DRY
TAKE MY LIFE
SAVE ME FROM THIS DEATH INSIDE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBQYrkIEqrw

>>79652632
fucking this

How much did it cost them to keep up the faggy servers anyway? It's not like amazon's not drowning in money

And summer comes early for the rest of time

soon the entire internet will be nothing but one page

you can buy what is currently displayed, or wait 30 seconds to view the next product

File: prometheus-my-reaction-when-i-let-go-a-silent-fart.gif (3MB, 220x242px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 220x242px

>>79652630
>This included the Private Message system
So they literally made it that we cannot private message people nor even reply to any reviews? So basically we can't at all talk about any movies on an Internet Movie Database...

Man, these posts are fucking alien.

fucking why?

I've used it for like 10 years and rarely saw political things.

Normalfags were warned that the censorship was coming and did nothing to stop it. Everytime you bring up the fact the internet is getting more and more sterilized of any opinions and independent thought you get told to go back to /pol/.

Now look what you get.

>>79652510
>they deleted everything
Implying there were anything since forever

Sticky when?

>>79652575
use archive org or something

>>79652701
are you stupid? normalfags love cencorship

>>79652701
what's next? you don't seriously think 4chan would ever go?

>mfw someone /b/ said they were from the future and stated that 4chan is gone and that internet censorship is a lot more extreme
Irony that I read this couple years ago and now look what happened to IMDB..

>>79652712
RIGHT NOW

DO IT SWAGLORD

>>79652686
It's not about politics

It's about censoring any negative opinions that might affect a new movie's market value

Ideally the only way to talk about any movie should be through reddit circle jerks where all negative comments are downvoted into oblivion

>>79652701
it's such a fucking JOKE

i am literally laughing over here

"ugh, thank god they deleted the forums. one less place for the ALT-RIGHT to troll!!!"

They just don't want people talking about how ugly an actress is or how bad a movie is.

Is this the most retarded thing to ever happen?

File: 500x1000px-LL-7490beca_Trapezoidemmy_02.jpg (40KB, 500x496px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x496px

>mfw I just signed up for IMDB a month ago in order to post on the boards

File: sad af.png (12KB, 873x222px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 873x222px

What was the last thread you visited lads

File: bullbrendan.jpg (134KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1024x683px

>>79652510
Have no fear

https://thechamcham.blogspot.com/

>>79652742
>It's about censoring any negative opinions that might affect a new movie's market value
this guy gets it. After Ghostbusters 2016 got such a blacklash, the Hollywood execs are trying to make it hard for the public to write bad stuff about certain movies.

Not to mention that Wonder Woman gets released in a few months time and it needs positive reviews

File: suffering.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>watch non-capeflick for first time
>can't look at/post on imdb boards
>resort to making a thread on /tv/
>0 replies

>>79652762
phew I was afraid with what would happen to thechamcham (aka Brendan Fraser) after IMDB closed his forum home.

tfw ywn go to your obscure waifu imdb page and see the Looks like _____ topic ever again

>>79652733
You don't need to be from the future to see that coming

The internet is getting more consolidated and more incestuous with mass media by the day. Negative opinions are bad for business. If a platform can spread negative ideas about a product, even if they are legitimate complaints they need to be censored for the sake of the corporation's bottom line

>>79652701
>>>/pol/

File: Capture.png (232KB, 654x459px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 654x459px

>>79652755
I thought I signed up a few years ago but apparently it's been 11 years. wtf does the time go

File: 1236526237.png (653KB, 611x863px) Image search: [Google]

653KB, 611x863px

>>79652762
>Brendan's got a page for The Mummy 3
FUCKING AWESOME!!

>>79652798
Made me both laugh and sad

File: 136523673478.png (414KB, 585x667px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 585x667px

>>79652762
>visit the site
>Brendan has pictures of himself as a baby, slowly growing up to be a man
LEGIT NOT JOKING

What does he mean by this?

You guys gotta browse this. It's like a whole new experience into the Brendan

File: dont_worry_be_happy.jpg (155KB, 838x1146px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 838x1146px

>>79652789
how long until someone hacks ChamChams blog?

>>79652510
You all have shit opinions and you don't need message boards to spread them. Imdb wasn't good. Some reviews are good.

You get the same pleb shit everywhere on the internet. Let /tv/ die as well

>tfw no more jews to trigger on the comments of holohoax films

But but muh 6 gorillion goy!

I'll miss those merchants

File: 0152136237.png (101KB, 569x496px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 569x496px

>>79652783

>>79652774
It wasn't just Ghostbusters

Tons of movies flopped last year because Hollywood is getting worse

The only way to keep hyped is if you forcibly cut off all sources of negative information

That means shutting down audience feedback

File: chamcham_buttmad.jpg (202KB, 996x863px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 996x863px

>>79652847
Really makes you think where does ChamCham get all that info?

>>79652849
THEY BETTER NOT! I wanna post how much I love Brendan on there

>>79652789
>I hope this will be a sort of sister (or would brother be more appropriate?) site to the www.brendanfraser.com website, long dormant , picking up where it left off.

Are we sure it isn't his brother doing all this?

>>79652510
good. burn it all down

Reminder:

>This is no surprise whatsoever. I've worked at IMDb (the worst and most discouraging experience of my professional life ) and believe me, the company is a soulless, empty corporate shell that has one goal: to sell advertising. It's not about movies, TV, or being 'guardians of data' - everything is about making money. The entire site is setup to sell advertising, and movie data is simply a means to achieve that. End of story.

>The reason IMDb is getting rid of the message boards is simple: they can't be monetised. If IMDb could make money out of the boards, they'd be staying, but there's no cash in it for them, so they're getting axed. The sell-outs who run IMDb will have looked at the 'metrics' (a risible corporate buzzword the Data Team loves so much) and decided that traffic is not high enough for them to make any real money.

>It really is that simple. I've experienced first-hand the obsession with metrics, and making money (at the expense of customer satisfaction), and it really is pathetic to behold. No decision is made at IMDb without greed being factored into the equation, and believe me, they will also shut down certain data sections at some point if they get in the way of making money. Forget the fact that the site has compiled 20+ years worth of important data - if one of the sections can no longer be monetised effectively (Literature, for example), they'll just get rid of it.

>In financial terms, keeping the message boards live costs IMDb basically nothing, bar the human cost of maintenance, which - when considered in the context of the site's huge annual profit margin - is less than miniscule.

File: B.jpg (8KB, 238x203px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 238x203px

How do you rate Brendan's blogsite picture?

>>79652857
this tbqh

>There's no point complaining about it, making suggestions, or suggesting alternate, viable solutions - the hacks at IMDb don't give a toss. There's no money in it for them, so they're not interested. They'll fob you off with the usual hollow platitudes, but make no mistake, the IMDb that people love died years ago. Now, the site is just a shiny, corporate plaything, pimped out by Amazon for the purposes of making money, with greed - not customer focus - being its primary driving force.

>One final note: it probably burns IMDb that the majority (over one third) of their users come from China, the audience for which is far less valuable to advertisers than, say, the USA and the UK. Only about 5% of IMDb's users come from the UK, which is ironic considering the site originated in England.

>The IMDb message boards were disabled on February 20, 2017. This included the Private Message system. IMDb is passionately committed to providing innovative ways for our hundreds of millions of users to engage and communicate with one another. We will continue to enhance our current offerings and launch new features in 2017 and beyond that will help our customers communicate and express themselves in meaningful ways.
Why do they post these false statements? Do one thing and say they're committed to the other. Just a lie to the face.

What are these new ways customers will be able to communicate by?
Emojis?

The Big Blue made me feel: thumbs up emoji

>>79652917
>the company is a soulless, empty corporate shell that has one goal: to sell advertising. It's not about movies, TV, or being 'guardians of data' - everything is about making money. The entire site is setup to sell advertising, and movie data is simply a means to achieve that.
this is how all website companies are structured, there's nothing inherently wrong with it.

>>79652857
For me it's not about sharing opinions. I deleted my imdb account in like 2007. All I want is to read some random people's thoughts on movies or people when I come across them. Like earlier today I came across Norman Lloyd's wikipedia page and figured I'd check his imdb for some maybe some interesting threads. There probably were some interesting threads before yesterday. I mean it's really not a big deal in the grand scheme of things, but it's just something that wasn't necessary and is now a real bummer.

File: 1252362347.png (289KB, 921x528px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 921x528px

>>79652902
Well whoever is one of the contributers of the blogsite, they liked the Tom Cruise missing audio trailer kek

>mfw Brendan laughs his ass off at this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGwFWpY8OII

File: 1447607100151.jpg (7KB, 153x179px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 153x179px

>>79652857
It had message boards for practically every. single. film. ever. released.
There is no comparison to be made with /tv/, reddit, or any other website. It was unique.

>>79652946
>there's nothing inherently wrong with it

>>79652944
>What are these new ways customers will be able to communicate by?
>Emojis?
probably. If you've played Mario Kart 8 on the Wii U, they don't allow any voice talking nor any texting but only a emoji system with a couple emotions.

>>79652946
making a decision that will actually kill the site is not wrong?

everyone is going to use rotten tomatoes now

>>79652966
>ywn look at independent European films and see if anyone has started a thread there anymore
feels bad man

>>79652944
>What are these new ways customers will be able to communicate by?
They are completely clueless anyway. They proudly claimed their facebook and twitter pages are an actual replacement for message boards, that shows either how far they're removed from reality or how much they're willing to lie.

>>79652966
yes anon it's called capitalism. there's nothing inherently wrong with an Internet company maximizing advertising revenue, companies literally only exist to make money and that is the way websites make their money

>>79652977
>everyone is going to use rotten tomatoes now
oh yeah I forgot that RT allow you to write your opinions about movies.. but is that only for critics or can anyone do that?

File: 72c8950f48b6f68e878465f0fbcb31af.jpg (52KB, 552x377px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 552x377px

>>79652510
IMDB WAS ONE OF THE EARLIEST BIG SITES ON THE WEB

THEIR FORUMS CAME AFTER BUT STILL, ONE OF THE OLDEST WEBZONES WAS JUST DESTROYED

SOMEONE KILL SA NEXT

>>79652977
it will have no effect. imdbs traffic comes from people checking movie data. do you think they would axe something that brought in more money than it cost to maintain?

>>79652917
That's not the only reason. It's because the boards cause them and Hollywood to LOSE money. That's without going into the political reasons.

>>79652993
to the average person it's probably a fine replacement. they'd rather post on social media than a message board and the stigma attached to it

>>79653018
yes companies make stupid decisions all the time. mark my words this is the end of IMDB. Do they really think it would be hard for anyone else to aggregate all the same data?

File: vfr.png (778KB, 500x648px) Image search: [Google]

778KB, 500x648px

nobody cares

>>79653031
lol hey look it's the tinfoil conspiracy guy. why don't you te me your rational and measured theories rofl

>>79653041
>to the average person it's probably a fine replacement. they'd rather post on social media than a message board and the stigma attached to it
what the fuck? no way. I'd rather post on IMDB than under my name on facebook

>than a message board and the stigma attached to it
you sound like a Jewish shill

>>79653071
they probably took that biased study on trolls and message boards seriously so they are literally (((SHUTTING IT DOWN)))

>>79653055
are you 14 years old? For those who are older, they grew up using IMDB and thus it is such a shame to see those message boards be disabled (btw 10 years ago there wasn't that many trolls as there were recently nor did anything ever get political from what I remember).

File: 1394967395526.png (95KB, 390x320px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 390x320px

>>79652999
>companies literally only exist to make money
there's everything inherently wrong with that, besides, thankfully, you're wrong. the good companies don't, and they figure out ways to make profit without compromising their vision. your mindset is why things like this happen and will continue to happen. call me naive if you will, but you're the one not only oblivious, but you enable the greed of those at the top of the food chain.

>>79653031
>the boards cause them and Hollywood to LOSE money
uh, how?

>>79653051
imdbs boards were slow as fuck. you dont think they have the data on message board traffic vs costs of hosting it? come on, man. the vast, vast majority of users probably don't even know there were message boards.

>>79652966
No it had the same shit said there as I see here twitter youtube letterboxd and reddt.

You had the same type of autists and jealous roasties posting 'opinions'

>>79652956
This is completely fair but its a plebish website there will be shitposts and less good posts than bad posts. The best place now are bluray.com forums .

Letterboxd is possibly more cancerous than imdb. Unironically youtube and reddit are the best bets.

File: kjfhkdsjfks.png (179KB, 252x306px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 252x306px

>>79653091
>abloo bloo bloo

nobody cares

File: JewsShutDownIMDB.png (437KB, 988x912px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 988x912px

>>79653088
>mfw /pol/ was right again
also irony that you got 88 dubs

>>79653071
lol how does saying there's a stigma attached to internet message boards sound like a jewish shill? it's always been something "geeks and nerds" use. are you 12?

>>79653111
fuck off kid. If you seriously think /tv/ and /reddit/ is the only place to talk about movies and IMDB meant nothing... well you are wrong. IMDB had tons of great discussions 10 years ago. Hell there was over 100 threads about Seinfeld each with their own unique discussion on certain episodes etc and now all of that is GONE FOREVER.

>>79653055
>>79653111
3DPD "waifu" fags are just as ugly on the inside as their whore producer cocksleeve idols.

>>79653097
>dude capitalism is evil lmao
>dude the good companies don't care about profit lmao
>dudes investor inrerears have no influence over business decisions lmao
I swear this board gets dumber and fucking dumber by the second

File: 6BQjPvM-1.jpg (118KB, 1086x1440px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1086x1440px

>>79653091
He's just right. Its a drop in the bucket nobody will do anything about it. Like tears in rain. When social media privatized it goes downhill.
>>79653055
Dubs confirm

>>79653107
the text message boards were slow? if only people looking for the message boards used them how was it a problem? If I was on the board or w/e and it was either hmm we take a risk killing off the potential reason anyone actually uses this site or b kill it because it eats less than 2% of profit it wouldn't even be a question.

File: 1380709727935.jpg (80KB, 692x414px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 692x414px

And nothing of value was lost, the boards were filled with normies, there was no actual film discussion.

WAKE ME UP

>>79653152
You are either Jewish or you want to see internet to be censored

File: gdgdgrrrrr.png (459KB, 409x464px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 409x464px

>>79653135
meh...
>>79653145
wow rude


I can see why the jews shut it down with buttwipes like you two posting there

>>79652677

Yeah golden age of the internet is behind us. RIP

>>79653135
im 27 and this is just sad and pathetic

>>79653160
>there was no actual film discussion.
You must be young because 10-15 years ago there was tons of film discussion.

But why am I arguing with someone like you anyway? Sorry that I didn't screencap all the great discussions.

Believe what you want kid

>the boards were filled with normies
the boards were filled with tons of discussions about characters, the plot, ideas on how you would rather want the movie to end etc instead of just BANE, CIA constantly

I'm absolutely shocked that 4chan still exists through all the years of this shit.

>>79653173
you didn't visit the Seinfeld, Predator, Terminator threads did you?

If you seriously think /tv/ has better film discussion then IMDB did, you are fucking wrong.

And fuck /reddit/ with its downvoting system that makes the place cancerous

>>79653154
this post is night incoherent. it's a very simple business decision: do the boards drive enough traffic compared to costs. the boards were fucking dead compared to 10 years ago, probably largely to the rise of social media. although half these anons will tell you it's a jewish trick because "they knew we were onto them"

>>79653109

>acting like you know shit
>hur jus go to utube

Fuck you /v/eddit retard kill yourself

>>79653148
Not him but your deliberate misquoting of his valid points is what's wrong with millennials.

>>79653198
it's a containment and monitoring site, like facebook

File: reallymakesthenoggintingle.png (156KB, 750x285px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 750x285px

>>79653071
>>79653119
>>79653165

>waaah muh message board is shut down now I might have to talk to people irl!

>>79653214
I never said that anon. it's just sad to be so attached to a messageboard. it reminds me of being in middle school. but nearly every site with movie and tv discussion with be a swamp of autistic screeching because it's inherently a solo activity that draws in lazy and isolated people

>>79653160
this is just dishonesty

how on earth can you claim such a thing

>>79653217
oh yes the huge costs of runing a text messageboard. it was poorly managed. if they switched to flat style and promoted some long time users to janitors it would have been fine.

File: 1459486088298.gif (892KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

892KB, 320x240px

>>79653234
>the internet shouldn't be used for discussion
I don't even get you people sometimes

File: 1385729052965.png (79KB, 250x238px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 250x238px

>>79653148
I not only didn't say, but in no way implied any of these things.

>>79652917
>The reason IMDb is getting rid of the message boards is simple: they can't be monetised. If IMDb could make money out of the boards, they'd be staying, but there's no cash in it for them, so they're getting axed

couldn't they have just added captcha or subscriber accounts, like $10 a year to post on forums? There were options to monetize it if they really wanted to rub their hands together but, I'm leaning towards censorship also being in play along with the financials

>>79653217
Do you really think the amount of traffic that would be gained or list by removing the forums can be calculated? That's idiotic. You are an idiot.

>>79653228
nope it pretty much quoted you verbatim
>there's everything inherently wrong with that, besides, thankfully, you're wrong. the good companies don't, and they figure out ways to make profit without compromising their vision

literally saying maximizing profit has "everything wrong with it", ie the basic tenant of capitalism is morally wrong. also
>deleting a dead messageboard to increase revenue
>comprising their vision
lmao you're a child

>>79653284
stop responding to elementary level baiting

>>79653234
>>79653244
heh, yeah

thank god anonymity is being destroyed on the internet

there was nothing good anyway

i would actually love it if some CEO of a massive social media giant traveled into my home and crushed me to death, sucked up my essence, and shit me into the ocean

humans shouldn't communicate if it impacts consumerism in any negative way

>>79653280
costs money to host and money to monitor. it was also very slow compared to 5-10 years ago. it's understandable imo.

>>79652510
/lbg/ already here
Time for /imdbg/ has come?

>>79653292
I'm not him, and no you certainly did not. Typical millennial response, though.

>>79653193
>You must be young because 10-15
;^)

>>79653245
>this is just dishonesty
Okay, maybe, but the majority of the threads on that site are all shit, it doesn't really other me since I stopped reading them when /tv/ was created.

File: i got rapped at a party while drunk by 2 guys should i take em to court or handle it my self - Get some better rhymes.jpg (50KB, 542x612px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 542x612px

>>79652510

File: sands of time.png (213KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1366x768px

>>79652510

File: 1381937718506.jpg (52KB, 343x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 343x400px

Problems?

>>79653356
Are all the thousands of boards archived?

>>79653288
yes you did. saying "everything is wrong" with maximizing profit is, like I just said, claiming the cetral tenant of capitalism and motive of companies is evil. lol. "good" companies don't operate at a loss, or spend money on things that aren't contributing to the company.

>>79652993
With that in mind, we’ve decided that as of Friday, October 14, the Spawn message boards will permanently be removed from the spawn.com website. Besides announcing this news, we also wanted to allow this transition enough time for everyone to collect any contact info they might need before the boards are officially taken down.

As we make this transition with our fan base, I want to personally invite you all to join us as we move the party over to our new social sites on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. We feel these sites will provide a better way to serve our community and loyal followers with more unique daily content including news, “first look “ photos, videos, and contests. So you can still get your McFarlane fix!

>Every company that shuts down their forums says pretty much the same thing.

>>79653329
do you mean slow as in user posting per minute or slow as in hosting?

>>79653041
>to the average person it's probably a fine replacement
Thing is, they're pretending like IMDB was just some generic forum that will easily be replaced by something else. Sure the "front" of it was, but the real draw of message boards was that every single movie, show, actor and everything had it's own separate board, something that doesn't exist on any other forum anywhere. And they killed it.

>>79653290
yes, of course it could. are you retarded? lmao there is literally a date and name for every single post across time. traffic literally keeps track of itself across time! the irony of this post! lmao!

File: 1485378988311.png (92KB, 382x381px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 382x381px

>>79653371
>I want to personally invite you all to join us as we move the party over to our new social sites on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter.

>>79653165
I'm nwither jewish nor wanting the internet to be censored. Fact is they are a company and this is what happens.

Yes its a plutocracy but go make youe.own website if you want it so badly.

>>79653219
I said the bluray forums. I never said to leave here but it is cancer here. Everywhere is cancer though.

>>79653284
>discussion
Lol. It is virtually tumblr tier crying half the time at least

>>79653308
imagine getting this assblasted over a fucking messageboard. please, please go outside

>>79653370
Actually small losses at the present in exchange for improved relations (thus improved future profits) with consumers for the future is an incredibly common business tactic. You're spouting some teenage level interpretation of capitalism. It gets harder to make money if the people who use your product don't fucking like you.

>>79653165
>you are either meme strawman #1 or meme strawman #2
thanks for activating my almonds /pol/, it really stretched my legs

>>79653368
No. We'll never know what two words Rob had for Glenn ;_;

>>79653421
admit it you're a jew that wants to censor the internet

>>79652895
I'm confused. How come he switches from saying things like, "I am..." and 3rd person like, "Brendan is...."

???

File: nightmares arent make believe....jpg (3MB, 2880x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2880x4320px

>>79653386
Discussing films in the comments section of youtube trailers is great anon, you'll learn to love it

>>79653407
deleting dead messageboards won't hurt them in the long run. the only people who care are /tv/. sorry anon

>WELCOME TO AMAZON THEATERS, A GREG LANSKY CORPORATION
>PLEASE INSERT YOUR SOCIAL ID
>YOU MAY NOW SELECT YOUR NEW MOVIE!
>BLACKED 758(100% RT): STARRING DAISY RIDLEY AND IDRIS ELBA
>OR
>BLACKED CLASSIC(100% RT): STARRING JENNIFER LAWRENCE AND IDRIS ELBA

>>79653398
Millennials actually believe they're entitled to message boards, that private companies owe them shit for free.

>>79653442
you got me anon. my name is heebey goldblat and my mission in life is exterminating the white race by antagonizing fat virgins on the internet

>>79653447
>the only people that care about a completely different site are /tv/
I am absolutely certain you are either baiting or extremely retarded.

>>79653447
>the only people who care are /tv/

Talk about living in a bubble...

File: ughgobacktopol.jpg (38KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x600px

ugh just accept it, nobody used them anyway

It's a shame. The boards were home to my oldest still existing internet account. Going there after a movie had been part of my movie watching experience for over ten years.

>>79652510
RIP in peace IMDb.

I wrote a short scrapper in Python that saved a buttload of the boards of the movies that I like though. I'm sure there are people out there that took it even further.

File: 1485751548855.jpg (56KB, 500x506px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x506px

>>79653455
>100% RT
KEK

THEY WANT TO CONTROL OPINION WITH PAID RT SHILLS, MESSAGE BOARDS WHERE ANYONE CAN POST ARE DANGEROUS

NOTHING NEW

THIS IS ALSO FUCKING HILARIOUS
>The site enables registered users to submit new material and edits to existing entries. Although all data is checked before going live, the system has been open to abuse and occasional errors are acknowledged. Users are also invited to rate any film on a scale of 1 to 10, and the totals are converted into a weighted mean-rating that is displayed beside each title, with online filters employed to deter ballot-stuffing.
> online filters employed to deter ballot-stuffing.

>>79653385
>1:1 ratio
Lol, if I had known you were this stupid I never would have replied to you in the first place. You probably don't even know what a ratio is. This is so pointless. Like talking to an animal.

>>79652510
THEY DID IT

File: 1425641954363.jpg (123KB, 640x796px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 640x796px

>>79653442
admit it, you're a retard who has picked a boogeyman, an entire people no less, to assign all of the world's problems and humanity's shortcomings to. you people are a ridiculous combination of naivety and malevolence, and you're exactly the "sheep" you think yourself above. too bad the only one who can wake you up to the real problems in this world is yourself. but the dream of being red-pilled, knowing the truth and seeing through the system in whose beds you sleep is too sweet, isn't it? you poor deluded souls almost manage to rustle my jimmies sometimes.
oy vey, I wonder who's behind this post!

>>79652917
Who are you quoting?

>>79653643
>(((THEY)))

FIXD

>>79653649
you're kind of slow if you couldn't spot the sarcasm in my post.

>>79653568
I think that poster has been involved in every single retarded argument in this thread. My guess is he's Australian.

>>79652783
The more obscure or unpopular the movie was the slower the board. You might get a reply in five years if you were lucky.

>>79653663
Some former imdb employee, as it says at the beginning. It was posted on imdb boards originally, so, unless that's archived, I can't help you with the source. If it is archived, you can probably find it pretty easily.

>>79652960
is tom cruise the best actor of our generation?

he is certainly the most consistent in terms of acting ability, role selection and movie success

It's not the same but if anyone was big into rating on iMDB and wants to move letterboxd is letting you import for free for a limited time. Better than nothing I guess.

Cinemos WHEN

>>79653670
oh reaaaly. when hordes of people on this website who continually spout similar comments with no trace of sarcasm in them, I definitely should've recognized sarcasm in an 11-word sentence which espouses, again, fairly commonly held, or at least prominently displayed views, in an anonymous context, without hearing your voice or seeing your face. silly me. of course, I can see the sarcasm now that I know the intention - just as it seems obvious to you because you wrote the post with that intention.

File: 2017-02-21 12_58_25.jpg (114KB, 1396x810px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1396x810px

Just to feed this notion of sites shifting focus away from user/customer opinions, have you noticed that Metacritic has changed its layout so that you now have to scroll down to see a comparison between the critics' rating and the public's? It used to be side by side right at the top of the page.

Dude you dont need opinion of normal people on movies, you can read what critics say on Rotten memeatos :)))

>>79653165
>Waah a private company isn't providing me a free message board anymore! They're literally taking my voice away!!
millennials were a mistake

>>79653706
I actually had conversations spanning half a decade on those boards, mostly with DVD collectors.

>>79652742
>reddit was hyping new power rangers movie
>some dude says he's like 40 and hasn't been this excited for a movie in 20 years
>gorillian up boats
>call him a fag
>get banned
>his account was like a week old and was only posting about the power rangers movie

Criticker or bust

>>79653858
why were you there in the first place tho

I think people are overrating it a bit now that it's gone, but it's sad and soon we can't have nice things at all anymore

>>79653886
>implying 4chan is any better

They are both shit holes that have different upsides.

File: 1477662624625.png (287KB, 496x472px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 496x472px

>>79653909
totally bro xD

>>79653922
>brand loyalty
I bet you participate in capeshit wars and console wars if you browse /v/, which I'm sure you do.

Why didn't anyone archive the entire thing? Why didn't anyone make a site with the same layout yet?

>>79653896
>I think people are overrating it a bit now
Likely, but even though I wasn't much of an active poster there myself (I barely ever frequented the main boards), checking the dedicated movie boards after watching something really has been a routine for me that'll now be sorely missed.

The fact that those boards were filled with opinions from all across the spectrum actually added to the appeal for me. They weren't enthusiast-run fan boards, that is.

Hopefully in ten years the internet will go through nostalgia and message boards and flash videos will be hot shit again.

>>79653948
>dude why aren't you a redditor are you a consumer slave or something
this is why everybody thinks you're cancer, fuck off back to your circlejerk web 2.0 shithole you fucking faggot

>>79653922
>le reddit bogeyman
Sad!

>>79653922
You can meme all you want but it's true.

>>79653953
>the same layout
I don't like clicking to view every post, thank you.

People could theoretically make one like hackernews, but for movies. light and fast.

>>79653982
>>79653977
>>79653948
samefag

>>79653986
>>>the same layout
>I don't like clicking to view every post, thank you.
I just meant a board for every movie/person ever.

>>79653986
>I don't like clicking to view every post, thank you.
There was an option at the top of every thread to change the view, you retard.

>>79652510
i was using winhttrack to save the entire forums but it fucked up and i have nothing Q_Q

>>79653976
>muh website is better than your website
why are you using "redditor" as an insult? you're fucking deluded. you are aware that anyone can create a board on reddit, right? "reddit" isn't a single entity. you're literally reducing an entire website to a strawman, similarly to how you could reduce the entirety of 4chan to /pol/ or /b/. this is exactly like brand wars.
by the way, this is coming from someone who doesn't browse reddit and has never had an account.

>>79654001
go cry in your marvel or dc thread or whatever.

File: 1477267142741.jpg (1MB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2880x1800px

>>79654013
Yes, and that removed the indentation so you never knew who was replying to who

>>79654038
you should have something, check your folder.


STICKY WHEN

>>79654001
>samefag 9 seconds apart
might your irrational hate for reddit have spawned from the fact that you yourself are fresh off the boat? trying to fit in, eh?

>>79654050
>removed the indentation
no, it fucking didn't. there were four different options.

>>79653976
This site has been a shithole for a long time.
Very fast forum, but other forums do it better (long discussions over lengthy periods, happens on slower boards but they'll get deleted at any rate)

>t. nonredditfag been here longer than 99% of you cunts

>>79654042
okay, Reddit, thanks for the paragraph telling us about how you're not a Redditor but Reddit is perfectly okay and we shouldn't stereotype it because it hurts your feelings but nobody cares

>>79654042
Because reddit as a rule attracts a certain kind of person. Someone who goes out of their way to use a website that uses some retarded upvote system to filter content is the kind of person I don't like to deal with.

>>79654050
>Yes, and that removed the indentation so you never knew who was replying to who
That's wrong too. Nesting view preserved the indentation and expanded all posts.

>>79652681
That's how they provide innovative ways for their users to engage and communicate with one another, anon. You just don't get it.

>>79654075
>>79654065
>no it didn't

well shit.

>>79654065
giving this a downvote and reporting you to the admin for abusing other users

you're fucked now kiddo

>>79654074
Someone who goes out of their way to post on an edgy mongolian cave painting simulator could be seen as contrarian if this site weren't as popular as leddit
The post quality is no different and the board culture is equally cancerous.

>>79654074
that might be the case, but it's one of the most popular places on the web today. people might be going there simply because there is a wealth of content, regardless of it being filtered through popular consensus - which also isn't entirely true, due to loads of different sub-communities there.

>>79654134
ummm, isn't insulting this sub's community grounds for being banned???

>>79652510
Yesterday wa the first time in a decade o watched a movie and didn't follow it by going to the IMDb message boards. Why even watch movies anymore man

>>79652889

This.

When people start questioning the bullshit hollywood shit out and gives to the audience

SHUT IT DOWN

File: 14032834098590.jpg (188KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 650x650px

>4chan and Reddit™ are equally cancerous places my fellow Four Channers, I have been here longer than you and have determined this and everybody that disagrees with me is a new faggot who is trying to fit in

Now you will never know if a movie with high ratings has been shill-voted.

Yeah sure there was a lot of shitposting and it was clunky to use but the message boards were a fucking goldmine of info and my first stop for any obscure movie question. I'd only just started to actively participate on the boards this year

Sad feels mane

File: 1qfwZyT.jpg (67KB, 709x765px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 709x765px

>tfw you'll never get a private message from Terrence Malick again

File: rC3pSPo.gif (494KB, 500x282px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 500x282px

>>79654143
>ywn again get into an argument with a random board regular who accuses you of being their archnemesis using a sock puppet because you disagreed with something they posted

File: 1382142907086.png (559KB, 600x889px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 600x889px

>>79654221
>being this triggered
Do keep pretending you're not a reddit tourist yourself.

File: goodbye.png (77KB, 750x307px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 750x307px

>11 years down the shitter

>>79654265
This is why you shouldn't waste time building online personas. Guy is probably gonna jump off a bridge.

>>79654204
>Yesterday wa the first time in a decade o watched a movie and didn't follow it by going to the IMDb message boards. Why even watch movies anymore man
Same, I always used to read those every single time.

Fuck this shit. Not like there's any good movies or anything good in the world anymore anyway.

>>79654287
That guy is probably the poster himself.

File: 1445977065964.gif (407KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 250x250px

>>79654256
You really think that because you're a cancerous faggot everybody else must be too? I guess this is the type of person an echo chamber with downvoting and admins that ban you for the smallest shit breeds.

I only used Imdb for the message boards, to read and share film analysis and theories etc. and some boards were really informative. Now that they're all gone, there is no reason for me to ever use Imdb again.

>>79653909
There is literally no upside to Reddit discussion unless you like shadowbans, power tripping mods, terrible jokes, and the most professional shilling fake posts you will find than any other corner on the internet.

>>79652873

every time a film is more than about two years old

File: 2017-02-21_133843.png (55KB, 649x179px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 649x179px

>>79654265
Same here.

>>79654312
I already stated clearly I don't browse reddit and never have - unlike you, I'm not a deluded retard participating in website wars either.

File: IMG_0161.jpg (19KB, 436x262px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 436x262px

HOW MANY FUCKING THREADS DO WE NEED ABOUT THIS?
I GET IT, ITS FUCKING CLOSED END OF DISCUSSION

>>79654248
proof, now

>>79654390
WITH THE TARTAR CONTROL

WITH

THE

TARTARCONTROL

File: 1457322108131.jpg (81KB, 419x480px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 419x480px

>>79654351
>I'm not participating in website wars, I am a completely impartial, levelheaded person who has never been to such a place as Reddit, now here are the reasons why there is nothing wrong with going there

File: 1389221519472.png (531KB, 443x550px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 443x550px

>>79654434
Stay mad.

>tfw you remember before Reddit, when /tv/ used to use IMDb as the place to tell plebs to go back to.

>>79654481
Yeah, but now that IMdB is better than nu-/tv/

>>79654481
You accidentally said "remember" instead of "imagine".

>>79654481
this never happened

>>79654390
Then ignore it you stupid man.

The IMDB boards were a unique beast in that it was the only place on the internet where every movie, even the most obscure piece of shit, had its own dedicated sub board that was open to anyone, fans and haters alike, and which would store and keep conversations open for years and years.

The main boards like "I Need to Know" or "The Soapbox" can be easily replaced (and already have more than adequate replacements), but those movie boards can not and probably never will. Those really are a loss, and the fact that the IMDB people are just telling everyone to go to their shitty social media accounts for discussions just shows that they didn't even understand the appeal and the unique use of their own damn boards.

imdb plebs btfo.
Where are you gonna talk about entry-level flicks and capeshit now? Oh right, /tv/...

>>79654797
But only fags use /tv/, I don't want to be surrounded by fags.

>>79652966
Check out themoviedb.org.

File: 16864139_423164561366988_6409221977549564258_n.jpg (11KB, 350x438px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 350x438px

>>79652510

>Tfw went to IMDb to re-join the Saw community for the new film
>Now its all gone

>>79652917
This doesn't sound right. A site makes money when it gets clicks. The message boards are what brought all the clicks. Closing them down really makes no sense at this point. Maybe they're preparing something new.

>>79654870
I'm keeping an eye on TMDB and MovieChat, hoping that one of them takes off.

>>79654915
They've said that they are planning something new, but not a board replacement or anything like that.

>>79654764
see
>>79654870

>>79654933
me too. I'm hoping it's TMDb since that seems more of a full on replacement and the forums are way more active. I just want to give a big fuck you back to IMDb.

So there it is. /tv/ really is the teenage IMDB demographic. And they're actually proud of being so.

Good fucking lord how pathetic. No wonder this board is rampant with pleb as fuck taste.

>WAT WAS W/ DA ENDING?
>I LIKE DA ENDING

Fucking kill yourselves.

>>79654870
I can't stand the horrible made-for-smartphones interface, so apologies if I haven't noticed, but.. as far as I can see, there are no boards for individual titles..?

>>79652510
It's too late now, but the only course of action left is to never give them a click again. Shame.

The forum's layout was so dated and needlessly annoying to use. Glad it's gone.

>>79654986
Never mind, I just found it. Well, that's nice, I guess, except they seem barren, even for really popular films.

>>79654977
>teenage IMDB demographic
I see you've never visited imdb beside the general boards, which are irrelevant.
I'm absolutely certain there are more teenagers here on 4chan.

>>79655005
The layout was perfectly fine. Now TMDb's is horrible.
>dated
Dated how? Not adapted for smartphones?

>>79652758
Either Jan Trolle's New Land or Gerard Depardieu's board.

>>79654870
>Check out themoviedb.org.
Terrible interface for cell phones, and very few discussions, but holy shit at least it has the discussion boards for specific movies.

Now if they could just import the IMDB archived discussions.

>>79655011
Not gonna lie: not thrilled with the interface either, but it's the best we've got at the moment and the founder seems open to feedback. Considering they're starting from basically scratch, I'm not surprised it's a slow start. I've started two threads in non-current movies and got almost instant responses to both. Think it might be due to https://www.themoviedb.org/discuss which is neat and IMDb never had that feed.

moviechat.org has imported old threads from IMDb but it has no DB to keep it interesting and there is much, much less current forum activity there.

They already did it partially months (or years, I forget) ago. Movies who had 12+ forums pages went to 1 or 2.

imdb forums were shit, but they were the place I could go to get some info that wasn't on other official places. Fuck. Just for that they were useful. Useful to edit imdb movie pages with new info that users (the non-retarded ones) found out and shared.

>>79655175
>They already did it partially months (or years, I forget) ago. Movies who had 12+ forums pages went to 1 or 2.
Yeah, I remember that. It was only a partial purge, though. Many of the rarely visited boards remained untouched.

good, now maybe /tv/ could take a hint from all this and do the same

>>79655247
Well, JUST because it happened on imdb doesn't mean it has to happen here...

>>79655247
Are you Brendan Frasier?

>>79652977
>everyone is going to use rotten tomatoes now
There are no message boards. If you want to leave reviews you can still use IMDB.

>>79653109
>No it had the same shit said there as I see here twitter youtube letterboxd and reddt.
Then don't go to the capeshit boards.
>go to dumb content board
Why r people her dum??! : (

>>79652917
>Literature, for example
internet
movie
data
base

>literature

>>79655291
Read the name, DUDE

fyi the rumors spread about me here are NOT true

>>79655300
A lot of people will see this a imdb not giving a fuck about the users. Even if they didn't even use the forums, it may drove them away. I know that's what it did to me. I'm not even sure why, but I feel the urge to keep away from imdb now because of what they did and I hated their forums.

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-21 at 6.58.54 AM.png (190KB, 1300x492px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1300x492px

>>79654265
>>79654347
burp

>>79655113
>Terrible interface for cell phones
good

>>79652677
A new internet will be created, with blackjack and hookers.

>>79655596
I think I phrased this poorly, I meant it's terrible because it's made for cell phones.

>>79653795
>without sarcasm
Most of the people who say that stuff are sarcastic or ironic, you buffoon.

>>79655626
oh jesus what how

>>79655607
and the hookers all look like Anita Sarkeesian and Brianna Wu with 350 lbs tacked on

>>79652681
Time to use their review system as the new forum.

>>79652510
good. imdb basically became 4chan 2.0

nothing but contrarian shitposting and baitposting. actually it may have been WORSE than this fucking hellhole

>>79655646
It has those terrible blocky Windows 10 things and it's all big pictures and little text and extremely limited information presented per page.

>>79655697
as it should be

>>79653380
this
>>79653041
this is retarded, so everyone has to see what I think of a 70s italian explotation movie (revealing that I watched it)? Besides there's no separate boards for separate movies, the only movie you could probably discuss on IMDb would be the flavor of the week.

>>79655749
>the only movie you could probably discuss on IMDb would be the flavor of the week.
meant to say on kikeberg

>>79653473
>for free
The people were the curators on IMDb, I hope they enjoy losing their free movie data

>>79654977
Similar to 4chan, IMDB wasn't one main demographic and had people of many ages. Many of the really older films had people who had seen them in theaters.

>>79655693
I like this idea, let's crash it into the ground

>>79655695
Wrong, if you ever tried to go to some interesting movie's board you'd see how wrong you are.

File: 1460830158198.jpg (8KB, 198x255px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 198x255px

I unironically think that a imdb influx coming here would not be a bad idea on principle. It's true that the boards were filled with idiots, but truth is, at the very least they fucking discussed movies.

>>79653834
They had a monopoly of sorts and they got people to curate their pages for free in exchange. No community means people won't care about their pages anymore. They just handed their community to themoviedb.org with their idiotic move.

>>79654065
>samefag 9 seconds apart
>what are phoneposters
you can make 2 posts at the same time to maintain the semblance of dialogue

>>79655643
Most? I really don't think so. Not anymore.

>>79652649
The servers would cost nothing. A few databases is all they needed, front end is already supplied by the servers hosting the main pages. They deleted them so they don't have to moderate them and worry about their image.

>>79656006
Anti-Semitism and racism used to be far worse on here than it is now. With the r/the_Donald unflux you can safely be assured it's almost all ironic.

>>79656008
updog.co

we can use this

>>79656028
>racism
I don't think it did. If you're referencing the frequent use of the word 'nigger', it's exactly as you say - ironic. I wouldn't say the same for much of the anti-semitism, though. Maybe I'm wrong, but this is what I've observed.

>>79656103
r/the_Donald is being ironic when they do that. They worship Jews like Milo Yiannapolous and Lauren Southern anyway. They're just edgy.

File: 1383672160952.gif (1011KB, 500x269px) Image search: [Google]

1011KB, 500x269px

>>79656041
What's updog?

>>79656121
Is that a Trump fanboy subreddit? Have they migrated here? I don't really keep up with the latest goings-on at /pol/.

>>79653097
Keep watching your chinese cartoons you fucking idiot.

>>79652510
Im not going to use the site anymore

>>79656163
Anytime you see anti-Jew and racist stuff it's usually from them doing ironic memeing. A majority of them aren't even White themselves.

>>79656124
The plane

File: top ravioli.jpg (50KB, 421x415px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 421x415px

>>79652510
HAHAHAHAA

Can Hollywood please die next and be reborn into,... something better?

File: ...jpg (35KB, 554x439px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 554x439px

>>79656279
I don't. I only have anime reaction images.

>when you realize the reason 4chan went to complete shit is because imdbtards came here

File: 1485506674319.png (196KB, 1029x590px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1029x590px

>>79656306
>A majority of them aren't even White themselves.
this, look at the HWNDU guys

>>79652805
>American Ultra a seven
not to be a dick or anything, but what did you see in it?

>>79653909
Reddit is the home of brainlets

>>79654265
just go to moviechat.org, they imported everything except for the newest stuff

>>79656306
>ironic memeing
You should realize that this is almost as bad as the real thing. "Ironically" held views always invite the company of those who are sincere about it. Which has been the case with /pol/. All it does is muddy the waters, which might be fun to a certain point, until you realize you can't see fucking shit anymore.

>>79656536
>just go to moviechat.org,
HOLY FUCK

THNAKS A TON

>>79652510
>Now /tv/ will be invaded by IMDb posters
REEEEE

>>79656632
Dude, /pol/ used to be FAR more racist not even a year ago. Most of them left for Hot Wheels Chan. The stuff you're seeing is ironic.

>>79654977
>going to capeshit boards
the point of IMDb was that you had a board for, lets say, Sette Note in Nero or Le Dîner des Cons and engage in discussion about those movies with other people. That is simply not possible on a regular forum where threads about obscure movies get slid into oblivion. Let alone ask specific questions about some obscure movie, you'd have to have it all mashed in a general.

>>79656690
>>79656536
I just took the 4chan username

>>79656690
You're welcome anon, I just found it thanks to this anon here, kudos to him: >>79655116
The only bad part is that you don't get your old posts linked to your profile.
>>79656754
lol

>>79656706
>will be

its been inundated with them for years. Otherwise no one would've cared that imdb was shutting down the worst forum in existence.

>>79656780
yeah, but it connects to imdb and imports all their info about tv shows and movies so that's a huge plus.

It's like the boards away form IMDB.

It could be /film/

>>79652510

Don't worry guys IMDB says that their facebook page is now the primary way that users communicate and talk about movies. they said it so it MUST be true!

>>79656847
Not gonna lie, former IMDb fan here. This is fucking hilarious watching IMDb crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let these guys get our clicks.

>>79656917
>IMDb fan

How the fuck can you be a fan of a website that exists only for the most basic and common of information?

>>79656954
It's modified /pol/ copypasta about Trump

>>79656954
>not recognizing pasta
How new are you?

>>79655116
>moviechat.org
A a good idea, I see great potential.

However, I wonder what the moderation will be like.

>>79657002

am i wrong in that it doesn't have any individual movie boards? that was pretty much the whole point of IMDB. I never cared about their general message boards.

>>79656954
>only for the most basic and common of information?
IMDb has more information of its type than any site on the internet.

>>79657023
>am i wrong in that it doesn't have any individual movie boards?
Yes. Search any movie, and you will find its board. Start a new thread there if you want. Example, Citizen Kane:
http://www.moviechat.org/movies/tt0033467

As you can see, it even uses the IMDb ID for ease of use.

>>79657066

nice. thanks.

>>79657112
It seems like they've copied threads from certain popular movies/actors/series onto their site from IMDb before they closed down as well, which is nice since IMDb didn't give a shit about that.

>>79656730

this. the fact that you could watch an obscure movie or a movie from the 40s and go to their message board after watching it to find a bunch of people talking about the film. sure there were a lot of trolls on the popular movie boards and actor/actress boards but you don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. IMDB shutting the whole thing down is stupid.

>>79657158
I think they copied EVERYTHING, not just popular stuff. Check this:http://www.moviechat.org/movies/tt0069019
>>79657295
Agreed. I'm pretty sure the highest amount of trolling happened in the general boards btw. I never used those though.

>>79652917
You never worked for IMDB simply because of your autistic green text bullshit. KYS.

File: 1435200732042.jpg (179KB, 404x521px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 404x521px

>>79657374
And I never said I did. You could've at least read the faq page and learned the function of greentext before posting. Fucking lurk more, you retarded cunt.

>>79657463
The fact that you read the FAQ page shows how fucking new you are.

>>79657491
>doesn't know what greentexting is
>says others are new

>>79657332
No they didn't copy everything, but it seems they copied more than I thought, which is good.

>>79657491
I recommend you just follow my advice. The page is there for a reason, to keep tourists like you from spouting stupid shit. You should learn how a site works before posting on it.
Meanwhile, stop trying to fit in. You can't even do that convincingly.

>>79657374
He was quoting an IMDb employee, dumb tourist
>>79657807
the newest posts aren't there, but older ones are, I think

File: reddit is down the hall and to the left.jpg (54KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 600x600px

>>79657374

>>79653909
haha yeah fuckstick this site is leagues above reddit haha not even a question

hollywoods worse than ever they definitely dont want people commenting about how shit everything is

its all propaganda anyways, cut the cord and fuck the jews.