Films numales and women will never understand.

Thread replies: 21
Thread images: 12

Anonymous
2017-02-16 01:54:45 Post No. 79488783
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: raw-60.jpg (2MB, 5760x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5760x4000px

Anonymous 2017-02-16 01:54:45 Post No. 79488783 [Report]

Films numales and women will never understand.

Anonymous 2017-02-16 01:55:53 Post No.79488804
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-02-16 01:55:53 Post No.79488804 [Report]

File: raw-63.jpg (1MB, 5760x2400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5760x2400px

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:05:13 Post No.79488964
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:05:13 Post No.79488964 [Report]

File: 1971-Straw-dogs-Perros-de-paja-ing-01.jpg (1006KB, 2086x3121px) Image search: [Google]

1006KB, 2086x3121px

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:06:22 Post No.79488979
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:06:22 Post No.79488979 [Report]

How to lose a guy in 10 days

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:07:05 Post No.79488989
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:07:05 Post No.79488989 [Report]

>>79488783
>>79488804
But Harry Potter is like the epitome of numale movies

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:08:36 Post No.79489017
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:08:36 Post No.79489017 [Report]

>>79488989
Nice meme, at least you tried. Numales are the bookfaggots.

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:31:33 Post No.79489414
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-02-16 02:31:33 Post No.79489414 [Report]

File: dullest.jpg (1017KB, 1596x2850px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 1596x2850px

Films that are apart of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises are impossible for anyone to understand! Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.