>OBLITERATUS HARRYIUS
where they even trying?
What was the purpose of this thread?
To demonstrate the immense performing range of First Actor Daniel Radcliffe.
>>79473536
circle jerk
To give M. Night an idea for a movie.
They fell for the gender fluid meme in an attempt to undull one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. This pasta is so stale nobody will realize I'm gay. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>79473611
He was really good in Swiss army man. Should have been Oscar nominated over Gosling in La La Land
What was the purpose of this scene?
>>79473744
If you can't think of a clever way to start it, don't post this.
To make my cock rock hard
What was the purpose of this scene?
>>79473536
I'm so glad Fantastic Beasts actually has a qt protagonist, Harry Potter a shit.
>>79473849
Yeah I'm gonna need some sauce on that
>>79473563
>OBLITERATUD HARRIUS ANDIUS THIUS DEATHLIUS HALLOWIUS PARTIUS ONEIUS
What did they mean by this?
>>79474236
>>79473849
Nevermind, unsurprisingly it's quite an easy thing to Google. There isn't exactly a large library of lesbians eating cereal out of asses.
>>79474292
>clumsy shy autist
>not qt
>>79473536
>this is what 17yo in the UK are supposed to look like