the one and only wandkino

"No!"
sage

>>79454819
Anybody ever wonder how Voldemort and Lestrange had sex? They were obviously fucking. What type of weird, wizard shit were they into?

When I die fuck it I wanna go to hell

>>79454819
D U L L E S T
U
L
L
E
S
T

What was the Ministry of Magic tax policy on wizards?

>>79454819
A million times less dull than Star Wars and LOTR.

Which Harry Potter Movie was the dulest

File: IMG_1635.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

If only JK Rowling hadn't scraped together the mental aptitude to create the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>79454819
Only the first 2 HP films are actually comfy. The rest are butt ugly and dishonest.

>>79455324
Spoken like a true pleb

>>79455324
Friendless autist: the post
Sage

>>79455229

Where would Heart of Darkness be at? That's what I'm reading now.

>>79455229
/thread

>>79454985
kys

>>79455366
What impressive autism you have loser

>>79455377
>>79455349
>>79455345
Harry Potter sucks

Harry Potter is so kino it hurts.