Why didn't Voldemort kill Lucius?

File: 14872036058981.jpg (3MB, 1685x2860px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1685x2860px

>>79449601
Why didn't he use his fairy magic to get himself out of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>79449601
You don't kill the true blue believers. You can't replace loyalty.

>>79449601
Anybody ever imagine Voldemort and LeStrange having sex? I mean they were obviously fucking. What kind of kinky shit were they into?

>>79449601
His wand was too dull to cast avada.

>>79450117
>they were obviously fucking
Well, yeah, they had a kid.

>>79449601
But what was the tax policy he planned to inact to fund the Muggle gas chambers?

>>79450306
That fucking play made me wanna shoot myself multiple times in the chest.

>>79450306
Voldie has a kid in the play? LMAO

Like how he didn't want to kill Neville at first, don't want to spill too much pure blood.

>>79450117
Cruciatus sado-masochism shit

Lucius is a shitty follower, but Voldemort absolutely will not kill a pureblood unless they're actively working against him and even then not without hesitation

>>79449601
Voldemort is such a rubbish villain.

There was nothing believable about Volemort lol. He killed his followers every time he had a bitch fit, and the Death Eaters went out of their way to revive this queef.

They should have cast Marilyn Manson for the role, he treat his band mates the same way

>>79449601
Yes yes this is all very interesting but what was Voldemort's tax policy?

>>79453696
Not really Malfoy and the majority of the death eaters go back to their lives, I think the only really devoted one is Bellatrix couple of 100 years of inbreeding. He only comes back because Pettigrew has no where else to turn