>"Back to the Future" future was 2 years ago

The POWER OF LOVE is a curious thing.

>>79398027
Make a one man weep

>>79398070
Make another man sing

>1985 was 70 years ago
>Hitler died 3 years ago
Time flies

File: 1403261186899.jpg (101KB, 800x823px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 800x823px

>>79398007
>"Blade Runner" will be in 2019

>>79398007
why is that dog?

>>79398007
Back to the Future was 62 years ago, you're thinking of Back to the Future 2.

File: back-to-the-future-1985--19-645-75.jpg (19KB, 645x287px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 645x287px

> 1985 was two years ago
but that's fucking wrong, anon

>>79401611
he means 1994 you fool

>>79399670
I was told there would be hoverboards.
Thanks Trump.

>>79401659
but 1994 was thirty years ago

File: blade-runner-drama-scifi-thriller-action-spaceship-city-g-wallpaper-1.jpg (561KB, 3840x1606px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 3840x1606px

>people in the 80s thought this is what the world would look like two years from now

>>79398091
Change a heart, to a little white dove

>>79403161
More than a feeling,

>>79403192
THAT'S THE POWER OF LOVE

>>79403086
spot on

>>79398007
where are my flying cars

where are my Mars colonies

I blame the scientists

File: trump cyberpunk.jpg (2MB, 2949x3686px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2949x3686px

>>79403086
ermm..

>>79404573
>no glowing umbrellas

>>79404553
I blame shitskins

File: future.jpg (333KB, 1680x870px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1680x870px

>>79404553

Thanks liberals

File: 2010s.png (1MB, 1379x591px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1379x591px

>>79405597

>>79405126
There's plenty of glowing umbrellas, though. Just not in that photo.

>>79405597
i'm pretty sure republicans aren't the ones inventing technology

File: 887.jpg (13KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 200x200px

>>79398410
>1985 was 70 years ago
Jesus Christ, I'm that old?

File: IMG_8349.jpg (29KB, 409x230px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 409x230px

>>79398410
>Hitler died

File: 1415237297320.jpg (8KB, 261x196px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 261x196px

>>79405597

>is your baby racist?

>>79406495
implying war isnt the primary driver behind technology.