How is he so rich if he never directed a blockbuster?

all his movies are fucking flops too

>>79359609
I just looked at his movies and none of them really made that much compared to their budget, except maybe boogie nights

>>79359609
pro-tip: a website isn't a good indicator of someone's net worth

>>79359618
>>79359609
There Will Be Blood?

>>79359609
>70 million
>rich
I make that dough in a year

he's a kike

>>79359696
I think Boogie Nights was his biggest hit

>>79359694
It must be bugged, his net worth is like 30M at most.

>>79359609
Massive inheritance.

His father was "the voice of Disney" and bought a lot of real estate in L. A. in the 70s and 80s.

>>79359713
thats alot of dicks too suck

>>79359609
It's all from Maya.

>>79359820
really? can you elaborate?

>>79359609
He probably had shares in his early films, at a guess
Having said that, if he's really that rich then I don't understand why he wouldn't be releasing a self-funded low-budget indie film every 2/3 years that was completely uncompromised

>>79360185
Have you seen his movies? I don't think there's too much compromising going on.

>>79360947
no sure, but the master was like 5 years after there will be blood, and inherent vice was like 3 years after that
and i get the feeling that a lot of the reason for this was securing funding. whereas, if he was that rich i don't see why he wouldn't spend $5m of his own money on each film without having to worry about investors

Like Shyamalan did for his last two films, for example

>>79359609

Spielberg is worth 3 billion. PTA’s networth is nothing comparatively. Directors at a certain level just start making a shit ton of money.

>>79361251
spending personal money on a movie is a big gamble. dingdong only dipped into his personals because even china and india wouldn't fund him anymore.

>>79359820

What the fuck are you talking about? Ghoulardi wasn’t involved with Disney.

>>79359820
fucking idiot