what other non-words should I avoid?

instead of great say double plus good

>>79337226
Big, specially if you are refering to a guy

Boring presumably, it's the opposite of interesting and is as meaningless a criticism as interesting

>>79337226
how about non-word for a start?

>>79337226
memewords?

>>79339609
why

Captain Fantastic is unironically in my top 10 favorite films of the past few years. Even if you remove all the qts it's still great.

passive-aggressive doesn't mean anything. it literally contradicts itself. when people use it theyre usually talking about just aggression.

not a word but "support the troops" is a completely meaningless phrase.

>>79339869
You just liked it because of the preteen butt. Admit it you pedo.

>inb4 projecting

Well then YOU'RE projecting the projection! Shut up!

>>79337226
"kino"

>>79337226
The idea of "non-words" exist just so people can bitch about certain words or phrases they don't like. There's nothing wrong with any word, it's just usage that really bothers people.

>>79339675
because "non-word" is itself a non-word. it's superficial and vague.

>>79337226
>fun

the worst of them all

>>79339999
>preteen butt

male or female? im asking for a friend

>>79340069
it insists upon itself

>>79340069
by so accurately describing what a non-word should be you've given a clear definition to "non-word"

>>79339973
>passive-aggressive doesn't mean anything
Nigga, yes it does. It describes when someone is being aggressive through indirect means. Just because the word "passive" on its own means one thing, doesn't change the fact that "passive-aggressive" has its own widelh accepted and used meaning.

File: kkkek.jpg (20KB, 400x266px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 400x266px

>>79338735

>>79337226
>Kino
>Meme

File: MV5BMjEwOTgwNTQwOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMzYyNDE0OTE@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,1499,1000_AL_.jpg (221KB, 1499x1000px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1499x1000px

>>79340088
>male or female?

Fuck knows. They all have gender neutral names like Krapso and Glup

>>79340133
A clear definition doesn't disqualify anything from being a non-word if we're to accept all these suggestions for non-words as they all have definitions and accepted uses.

>>79339973
Passive-aggressive refers to inherently passive actions that, given the context, are intended to be aggressive
it's perfectly logical anon if you actually thought for once

>>79340183
oh you meant figuratively? theres not actual butt shots in the movie?

>>79340254
Yes there is. One of the kids likes to walk around naked

>>79340295
is that legal?

>>79340295
oh ok thanks. its probably a boy then.

>>79340226
>>79340142
Fair enough. I stand corrected.

>>79337226
"cuck"

>>79340327
When it comes to film/art child nudity is simultaneously legal and illegal. It mostly depends on who wants to spend the money prosecuting it.

There's loopholes and qualifications. For instance, in america, you can have underaged nudity if you get the guardian's permission. Even then someone can still sue you.

/tv/ always thinks it's cut-and-dry one way or the other but the actual laws are complicated.

File: Captain_Fantastic.webm (3MB, 720x300px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x300px

test

>>79337226
I'm not gonna lie, to be honest is really annoying

File: TOMBOY.jpg (91KB, 900x1076px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 900x1076px

>>79340327
Tomboy even had a vagoo shot

>>79340327
nudity is perfectly acceptable as long as the child isn't sexualized or abused. i'm always surprised when people are uncomfortable around naked kids. it makes me think they have something to hide

>>79340676
I was brought up with all nudity being taboo
ie "only show your penis to your special someone" type shit
I think the logic might have been about stranger danger and looking out for pedos but it's fucked me up to the point where any nudity feels sexual even though logically I understand it's not

>>79340590
That's why women shouldn't read books.

Wish I had a dad who loved me :(

>>79340590
slut

>>79340927
were you an only child? i grew up in a very large household and some of my younger siblings would run around naked or in underwear (at least until they hit preteen years). i guess i never considered little kids going nude to be the same as teens or adultsabout it.

>>79340960
>loved his kids so much he fucked up their childhood and upbringing
no you don't

>>79340982
I have a brother who's 3 years older than me but he's equally (if not more) shy
I think we might have taken a bath together once when we were really young and gotten changed at a public change room at the swimming pool or something but that was all pre-puberty

>>79340676
Sexualized isn't a clearly defined term tho. Someone could argue that nudity is inherently sexual. And they could argue that in court. And people have done exactly that.

If it were that easy to get away with producing and distributing child nudity a lot more people would be doing it.

>>79341059
thanks for the contribution. you literally added nothing to the conversation.

the guy was asking if nudity is legal in films. yes, it is unless it violates child pornography laws. dumbfuck

>>79341143
And I said that child pornography laws are not clearly defined. One judge can say it's legal and another could say the opposite. It depends on how the law is interpreted.

In the U.S. we have a phrase that was coined by one of our supreme court justices years ago before you were born about what defines pornography: "I'll know it when I see it" This was a top judge in the country who said it.

If you record a naked kid and call it art it is not a get out of jail free card. I don't know why /tv/ has such a hard time with this concept.