Irrefutable

>>79309863
>Le Azkaban is the best meme

So tired of this meme opinion. Here:

1>7>6>3>8>5>2>4

>>79309932
>>79309863
what are you talking about, 4 is one of the best

Jesus fucking Christ, this board is essentially /b/ with less porn. Why am I here?

File: 955F1B73-F908-4671-B5C3-4FF59FF3DE9D-230-00000015BD9212A1_tmp.jpg (46KB, 320x240px)

46KB, 320x240px

>>79309985
Nobody wants you here anon. Get your shit and GET OUT.

File: 1486423410294.jpg (1MB, 1578x2842px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1578x2842px

As much as I'd like to attempt to, I can't prove you wrong with regard to one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1482234891003.png (3MB, 2048x1714px)

3MB, 2048x1714px

>>79310039
What does James bond have anything to do with anything you idiot?
>book ranking pic
You should be able to judge films separately from their source material.

>>79309932
It's actually not a meme. I consider myself a self-taught expert (or aficionado you could say) on cinema and I came to the independent conclusion that the third film was by far the best. Every other film is painfully mediocre and simply relies on the branding of "Harry Potter" to make any sort of headway of quality.

>>79309863
6 and 7 is shit u retard.
3>5>4>8>2=1>7>6

This guy has no idea how to count.

It's 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

File: directing master race.jpg (19KB, 478x324px)

19KB, 478x324px

why are mexicans such good directors

File: 1478143280992.png (328KB, 451x451px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 451x451px

>unironically liking harry potter

one day you're going to have to grow up

>>79309863
Objective rankings
6>3>7p1>4>1>7p2>5>2

>>79309863
>>79309932
>>79311357
>>79311396
kys niggers.
top tier: 3, 6, 2
okay tier: 8, 1, 7
bottom tier: 4, 5

File: Autism.jpg (1MB, 5246x3037px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5246x3037px

>>79310039
> LOOK MOM I POSTED IT AGAIN DO I GET GOOD BOY POINTS

http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/image/GwhV09WgP0sjrKALzD6mvw/

>>79310039
Thanks for the daily dose, doc.

>>79309863
watch as i shatter your little world:
3>1>2>4>>>5=7=8=9

>>79310039
a shitpost a day keeps the discussion away

>>79312385
>harry potter discussion
please... keep it away
DullestFranchiseChan is doing god's work.

I wish harry potter films kept the cheesy whimsicalness of the 80s that was in the two films desu