Find a Flaw

you're a phone poster

File: IMG_6379.jpg (66KB, 564x697px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 564x697px

>>79295459
One huge fanfiction shipping fest.

From best to worst:

2>1>3>4>6>7>5>8

First two were the best
Third and fourth were alright (only like the 3rd one because of Gary Oldman)
The rest is shit, all filler (third was also filler) fanfiction shipping, WWII meets fantasy, Twilight-style finale bullshit

File: Where is atlas sugar.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

Uhh you mean besides being an edition in the of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>79295570
I want to FUG that Hermione.

>>79295459
Ginny

>>79295637
>tfw too intelligent to not resist posting pasta

The series is popular, it doesn't deserve to be compared to actual well-written works. Just because it's popular doesn't mean it's good. Why don't you go stretch your legs instead of focusing on this?

File: haggord.jpg (286KB, 1253x849px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1253x849px

>>79295570
this is awful, awful taste. Chamber of Secrets, in particular, is one of the worst films. 4 hours long, bad acting all the way, doesn't have the charm/intrigue of the first film or the dread of later films.
3 > 6 > 7 > 1 > 5 > 2 > 4 > 8

>>79295570

The less Voldemort has to do with the overall plot, the better.

It's pretty much western Naruto where the first half is sparse with the characters at first but eventually adds more that are interesting but with little development while the last half goes all in on the main TAKE OVER LE WORLD plot and becomes much more about who's fucking who and various asspulls and hidden relationships from the past than making a good, original story.

File: jd.jpg (15KB, 379x288px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 379x288px

3 > 6 > 7.1 > 2 > 4 > 1 > 7.2 > 5

You cannot refute this.

File: daniel-radcliffe.png (191KB, 300x611px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 300x611px

>>79295459
D R O P P E D
R
O
P
P
E
D

>>79296436
>childrens movies made for tumblr "adults" and imagery from a reddit show
biggest flaw right here buddy

>>79296335
>The less Voldemort has to do with the overall plot, the better.
which is why 3, 6, and 7 are the 3 best films in the series by a large amount.

>>79295570
loli hermione makes me harder than than dumbledore's morning wood

File: year 2.jpg (761KB, 1285x1127px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 1285x1127px

>>79296886
Which year's loli Hermione is your favorite?

>>79296436
If 2 isn't at the bottom you're wrong

>>79297157
second year without a doubt

File: Harry-Potter-and-the-Chamber-of-Secrets-theatrical-teaser-poster.jpg (195KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 800x1200px

>>79297258
Year two Hermione is so perfect it's almost painful.

So did Hermione like Harry more than just a friend? Like was she ever tempted once?

>>79295459
The god awful color "correction"

>LETS JUST GET RID OF ALL THE COLOR EXCEPT DARK GREEN

>>79295570
Imagine casting a spell on hermione that made her lust insatiable

I'm here with the patrician definitve chart. If you agree with this list or only swap 2 movies, you're a patrician.

3 > 6 > 7.1 > 5 > 4 > 2 > 1 = 7.2