*breaks your wand holder*

>>79248933
What was the point of wand handles in the movie?

>>79249075
status

he is literally emasculating him
this is pretty much the equivalent of castratation

woah, those movies are deep

File: 1482061719719[1].jpg (724KB, 1456x1776px) Image search: [Google]

724KB, 1456x1776px

Wand holders are pointless objects, but what else could you expect from the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>79249540
I was expecting this, now I can leave this thread.

>>79249540
I love you

>guy makes harry potter copypasta
>then makes a harry potter thread so he can wait 5 minutes before posting it

haha epic xDD

>>79248933

everyone even the great voldemort and the incomparable dumbledore and the incredible harry use wands. guy in fantastic beasts regularly does magic without using wand.

plot. hole.

>>79249540
Holy shit, when did someone make a movie tier list instead of books?

>>79249665
9 posters, 9 posts

File: 8.jpg (116KB, 530x575px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 530x575px

If you shove your wand up your ass could you cast magic out of your body?

>>79249075
they're like those penis extenders cucks wear

*upvote reddit styles your post*

>>79249864
Did you mean to say "upvotes your post reddit-syle"? I'm gonna have to downvote you for this one

DEH

>>79249075
>What was the point of wand handles in the movie?
Just a pretentious accessory, like tie clips. Unless you wear a tie and write with a quill and ink bottle, tie clips are 90% useless.

But some people will do things like that just so that they can have one more place to wear precious metal. I suppose cuff links are a related pretention and I even wear those.