Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Can someone explain this film to me please? I've seen it three times and I can't figure out whether it's misogynistic or not - Dafoe seems like the most rational character through most of the film, despite not being an actual doctor, he wants the best for his wife by trying to help her himself. People claim that the film ISN'T misogynistic because it paints Dafoe's character as "selfish" due to his actions... and for the most part, I just don't see that.
And no I'm not trying to be one-sided, I have a feeling this film tries to represent the negative aspects of both genders, but it seems like it criticises women more.
Feel free to analyse other aspects of the film if you want.
>>
i like the penetration right at the beginning
>>
chaos reigns
>>
>>79222883
Those were doubles right? Or did they really fug
>>
>>79222883
>>79222911
typical /tv/...
>>
>>79222871
>can't figure out whether it's misogynistic or not
>>79222949
Now you know why no one cares about this thread.
>>
>>79222871
Feet tho
>>
>>79222889
>tfw no qt 3.14 self disembowling fox gf
>>
I like that scene in nymphomaniac where the antichrist music starts playing while the kid walks toward the balcony
>>
I dunno, i mean he blamed her for her sins, offered her a false way to salvation and made her hate him and long to be killed by him.
I think its kinda obvious who is meant by the title.
>>
i want to tongue fuck those soles
>>
>>79222871
Women are portrayed as not only repellant, but self-hating. Just because the female character is the one who hates femininity more, doesn't excuse the film of being misogynistic.
>>79225787
Er, no he didn't. She blamed herself, because she was mentally ill.
>>
the intor is pure peniscore
>>
>that feel when the director tells you that your penis is too big for the scene, so they cut your scenes and hire a body double
Being Willem is suffering
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1