fuck

>>79201783
Damn, I was pretty hype for this too.

I might still watch it, a 5.8/10 isn't that bad if you think about it.

>I'm going to see it anyway

>expecting a Gore Verbinski movie to be good

Why?

>>79201864

a gore verbinski movie that comes out in the january/february bad movie dumping ground at that

>>79201824
This
Critics can suck my dick

File: 5636.png (148KB, 297x247px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 297x247px

>there isn't one positive review on RT whose summary doesn't include a BUT

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/a_cure_for_wellness/reviews/

>>79201926
Double this

>>79201864
>black pearl
>not good

>>79201783
Who cares? just watch shutter island instead

>>79201783

Gore Verbinski kino was never meant to be

File: 1439751841352.jpg (46KB, 691x624px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 691x624px

>judging a film by its RT score

sure is reddit in here

>>79201783

JUST

>>79201803
>a 5.8/10 isn't that bad if you think about it.

it seems pretty bad

>>79202244

john wick 2 is at 95% right now and it's 7.5. only a difference of 1.7 points but it's 56% fresher.

I'm going to watch it because I form my own opinions

>>79201783
Fuck. The trailer looked good.

>>79202798
I don't really want to be a in a movie theater for two and a half hours. I'll probably wait for a bluray rip and watch it at 2x speed

File: ams_26.png (146KB, 639x270px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 639x270px

isn't that the question of the day?

Slow pace seems to be the main complaint.

>>79203350
How is that even a complaint, Jesus Christ.

>>79202817

The initial teaser was amazing. Then the first trailer looked worse. Then the second trailer looked even worse. Now the reviews are even worse.

I'm starting to think this might just be shitty.

>>79201783
If critics hate it it means it's too smart for he mainstream plebeian masses.

>>79203421
t. zack "capekino" snyder

>>79201824
who are you quoting?

>>79201938
What about the review that gave it a perfect score and says "IT'S LIKE SHUTTER ISLAND MEETS CRIMSON PEAK MEETS BIOSHOCK"?

>>79201783
>1st trailer was GOAT
>2nd trailer was meh
>superbowl thing was meh
>actual movie is pure shit

another victim of the suicide squad syndrome

>>79203369
It's 2 hours and 26 min.

>>79202817
do you really decide on going to a movie based on a fucking rotten tomatoes score?

>>79202817
I was into the movie from the billboards, then I saw the trailer before Split. Guess I saved myself some time. Apparently there's a Power Rangers movie now too for some reason.

Also RIP Dane DeHaan's career for the 4th time.

File: IMG_5354.jpg (29KB, 620x413px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 620x413px

>>79203350

>There aren't enough quips or pop culture references to keep me interested. Where were all the explosions?

Fucking plebs I swear

>>79201864
>Rango
>not good

>>79201783
>expecting DUDE CRAZY PEOPLE ASYLUM-shit to be good ever

>>79203350

Probably nothing happening for a long time and it'll end up being inside is head the entire time.

>>79204037
Explain

Pleb critics just couldn't handle unfiltered VERBINSKINO

>>79201803
this
>>79202244
>>79202342
This is just RT.
somebody post their ratings on epic movies where they gave same ratings (no not BvS)

>>79201903
Split came out nowadays too, and was great

>>79201864

it looks good though...visually at least.

though, i had my suspicions when i saw it was a plot about g0iNg Kw/-\zY!!11!1!11!1

>>79201864
>shitting on one of the most underrated directors of our time

shame he keeps getting shafted by studios

fuck, i'm taking the gf to the movies this weekend. do I see this or John wick 2?

>>79205762

see john wick anon, it's be easier to watch. if you see this movie she's gonna be constantly asking you stuff "wha? who's that? why did that happen? uhh, okay lol."

>>79201864
Mousehunt

>>79203822
Or, gimpy, the movie wasn't interesting enough to justify the slow pacing.

Damn, Verbinski. Even Shyamalan managed to unjust himself. Get your shit together

>>79202876
aren't you supposed to wait for someone to actually make a question?

>>79201824
This. I'll better watch a suposedly bad movie with interesting premise and by competent director than generic Disney shit with good scores

File: dane-dehaan-amazing-spider-man-2[1].jpg (61KB, 868x491px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 868x491px

>>79206042
Isn't that the question of the day?

>>79201783
Is Dane Dehaan's career finally dead after this? He's only been in shit and flops since Chronicle

>>79206488
Valerian could be his last chance

>>79203517
Well he did spend 2 years on trying to get his bioshock film off the ground

File: 14757981644290.png (84KB, 351x351px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 351x351px

>tfw even capeshit gets better ratings than a genuine artistic kino

>>79207141
is it kino tho? how do you know?

>>79207179
trust me i'm a kino expert

File: 1486487723839[1].jpg (81KB, 797x618px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 797x618px

>>79201783
meanwhile the reddit flick is holified to 100%

>>79207490
Maybe this movie is actually just shit and John Wick is good?

>>79201783
Is it really that bad?

It seems to be another great trailer but shit movie core.

>>79207701
How we suposed to know, Einstein?

If you saw "Gore Verbinski" and "Dane DeHaan" and thought to yourself "this will be good" then you're probably retarded.

All the negative reviews are basically that it's a slow burn psychological thriller rather than a overly violent jump scare hollywood horror movie.

Sounds like it might actually be great to me.

Who here gets an inordinate amount of pleasure out of reading wikipedia full plot summaries of horror/thriller movies?

>>79201803
>I-if RedditTomatoes doesn't like it, then I can't!!

>>79201864
>visionary director

DROPPPPPPED

>>79208418
You can't watch every single movie, and you need some means of identifying which ones you'd like to watch before watching them. Since Verbinski is a hit-or-miss director, the tomatometer is worth taking into consideration.

>>79208152
No but I do like to read the parental guidance section of imdb pages on horror movies
I like to imagine 90% of them are done by some bible camp leader on one of those old grey box PCs that runs on windows XP

>>79208636
>8/10

>11 F-words. 15 Sh-words. 1 C-word. A few Hells and Damns including 2 instances of G-damn. Even with the R rating this film contains excessive swearing.