This was so much fucking better than La La Land.

>>79188489
Why couldn't they get a Christian to play Garfield's role?

Why wasn't it nominated for Best picture?

except it wasn't.

>>79188625
It was good and La La Land was bad. You fucking spook.

>>79188707
No

>>79188489
literally no one talks about this movie. in fact this is the first thread i've ever seen on /tv/ about it. nuff said

>>79188908
I saw a thread today

It was too long and too slow. They could've compressed some parts. I was thinking Scorsese was old and slow so they had match the movie to him.

>>79188908
On a forum that the majority of posters are retarded and less than 20 years old. Real representative of the general audience, fucktard.

>>79189408
you just called yourself retarded and less than 20 years old. gratz

>>79189435
No they didn't?

Silence is 10x better than La La Land.

>>79189435
I am over 30 and a fucking genius. Try again, fucktard.

>>79188576
That's Hollywood for you. (((Oy Vey! We can't have a gentile playing the role now, can we?)))

>Silence
>trailer is filled with ear grating strings

>>79188489
loved this movie. the acting and cinematography were superb.

I really dont care much for the new scorsese stuff, but he was fucking robbed at this turn

>>79189390
It's weird that people found this movie long, I was 2 hours in before I even checked how far through I was. I guess this is just the ADHD generation, though.

Then again, in Hacksaw ridge, I checked the time every half an hour, because it was just such a pile of fucking cliche garbage.

>>79188489
Yes, it was.

Much better indeed, as are most of the other nominees

Most of the movies are better than La La Land.