>Embargo is up in five minutes Thoughts? Predictions?

mildly worse reviews than the previous. critics didn't like that one so they won't like this one either

>>79165121
is the first one any good

>>79165204
yes

>>79164639
It's going to be mediocre

>>79165204
yes

>no romance
>no quips
>no leftist agenda

obviously hated by critics

>>79165204
First one is one of the best pure action movies in the last 10-15 years desu


>>79164639
80 on RT, 92 audience score. I don't think a bigger budget is gonna screw them.

>>79165204
Yes. Go watch it.

>>79165218
>>79165244
>>79165254
>>79165274

aight boys I'm watching it tonight then

>>79165204
it's fantastic

John Wick and Kingsmen are some of my favorite movies in a long time

Critics will look for some kind of social or political message to apease their clickbait hungry, sjw chasing editors. They will find nothing and therefore rip on it.

Everyone else will think its a kick ass action movie and Keanu will be embraced as this generations Clint Eastwood.

/tv/ will love it until normies like it, then they'll hate it and say they always hated it. Until it's not popular anymore, then they'll call it kino.

>>79164639
critics will probably hate it but if it has more scenes like this its already kino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-HSoOFdJ3s

>>79165204
yes.

One of the best pure action movies in the last ten years, just behind The Raid and maybe Mad Max Fury Road in my opinion.

>>79164639
Average and boring like the first.

File: 3.jpg (35KB, 537x266px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 537x266px

>>79165244
>obviously hated by critics

why there is a big fuzz about this? the first one was average at best.

>>79165450
First one was a sleeper hit no one expected to be even remotely good, so that's why people consider it a lot better than it was.
Second one is suppose to springboard off that, but there's no way it can deliver.

>>79165450
Because the first one was a masterpiece in action with an interesting world and a cool story

Man from nowhere was better.

>>79165323
On point

why can't more western action films take john wick's approach to fight choreography instead of jason bourne?

Instead of quickly cutting between scenes and making sure every one of the hero's movements is perfectly practiced with no mistakes, why not let him fumble and trip like keanu did?

Adds an element of realism

>>79165344
Good taste here.

>>79165582
guess which one's easier?

>>79165450
I think people really enjoyed the shit out of the gunplay. A lot of the dialogue was really cringeworthy, especially from the mobster and his kid.

The whole film was like one long Michael Mann shootout without any of the of the sappy bullshit that might otherwise make or break the movie.

File: 1406739537245.jpg (24KB, 472x472px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 472x472px

>>79165555
Chequed.

>>79165644
Probably john wick? You don't need as many takes because any mistakes can be included. And from that vid of keanu training he's probably practiced enough to make a more prolonged shot look good.

why is he called keanu reeves anyway?

>>79165450
People liked that all the action wasn't a big blurry mess of quick cuts and shaky cam that ensured you can't see shit.

Why does Ruby Rose keep turning up everywhere?

>>79165751
fuck you talking about

>>79165751
why people go apeshit about ruby rose? looks like another tomboy 2bh

>>79165780
She's in this... She's in the new Triple X movie... She kinda has been everywhere.

>>79165804
oh man how was the triple X movie?

>>79165751
Ruby Rose is what dykey feminazis wished they looked like, but they actually look like Lena Dunham

File: Doubles-Animated.gif (643KB, 300x203px) Image search: [Google]

643KB, 300x203px

>>79165699
There is a high concentration of dubs in this thread.
Is there a correlation between good movies and dubs?

>And what a stupendously entertaining ride it is. Director and former stuntman Chad Stahelski is back in the director’s chair, and he knows his craft inside out: every punch lands hard, every gunshot roars like thunder. Neon-lit and gloomy, the film is lovely to look at – think Nicolas Winding Refn without the pretension.

mite b cool

http://www.timeout.com/london/film/john-wick-chapter-two

File: wick2.png (365KB, 1466x1230px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 1466x1230px

All positive reviews so far

>>79165204
You see all these guys saying yes,IT'S A PURE ACTION MOVIE?

Yeah, what they mean it's theat you're in for 90 minutes of over the top "badass" fights. Literally only that. There is basically nothing else in the flick and thank god, cause the little bit that do is there, is completely dumb
A dead puppy, what the fuck.
So, to answer you question, is JW good, yes, it is good, if you're retarded

>>79166021
>"theat"
>"completely dumb"

Everything you said after that is incredulous, you know that right?

>>79165827
I didn't see it. I'll download it when it comes out but I just know she's in it from the trailers.

>>79166021
>wouldn't want revenge if someone killed his puppy

Hello autist.

>>79166021
salty

oh i'd love to oh wait I live in Australia and we haven't even fucking rated it yet its a fucking movie just play that shit you pussy

>>79165450
Because it was an enjoyable 90-minute action flick which puts it above 90% of the movies that have come out this decade so far.

>>79166510
>which puts it above 90% of the movies that have come out this decade so far

its a very simple concept: watch more movies

>>79165923
Pretty good. I'll watch it on a matinee.

>>79166543
Will that make most movies not be irredeemable garbage? What's even your point

File: 960.jpg (66KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 960x540px

>>79165204
No. I rate it 5/10.

Mediocre action flick that has a great first act but when his dog dies, it becomes nothing but action.

Keanu isnt that much of a good actor in it no offence. I loved him as Neo but he just doesnt do the movie justice.

No idea how this movie gets that much praise. Not interested in seeing the sequel.

I'd rather see a Tom Cruise Collateral sequel or if it is true that Cruise's character died at the end, make a sequel with Jamie Foxx as the lead because I really like him as an actor.

>>79166510
John Wick felt like a chore to get through. I dont consider it "enjoyable" really.

I guess I have grown out of bland action flicks and prefer story first.

Remember how good the first Mission Inpossible was and how shit Mission Impossible 2 was.

>>79166021

are you actually upset that /tv/ likes this and you dont? stop being contrary

>>79165664
>The whole film was like one long Michael Mann shootout

Michael Mann shootouts are realistic and absolutely nothing like John Wick's.

You're incredibly wrong.

>>79166953
Yea i'd have to agree with your hear. Just the sonics in Mann's sequences alone pull you in way more so than in Wick. His use of score silence should be noticed more.

File: 1476446878837 (1).jpg (43KB, 397x395px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 397x395px

>>79164639
He will headshot about 50 people in the film all the while doing obviously choreographed rollie pollies.

>>79166723
This, there's no tension in the film, basically for 2hrs John Wick just insta headshots everyone around him, he might do a little wrestling here and there but that's it, no personality, and boring action, why it is praised is beyond me.

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-06 at 11.48.27 AM.png (54KB, 696x338px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 696x338px

John Kino

>not in swedish cinemas because the first one sold like shit
ROOOOOO

>>79167203
And we will enjoy every moment of it

>>79165204

Honestly, I didn't like it. I didn't think it had much substance, and it also took itself too seriously to be just a popcorn action movie. It was "Keanu Reeves Shoots People for Two Hours." He's not a great actor, the plot was generic, the action scenes looked really scripted, and I never managed to care about anyone in the movie other than the old black guy for some reason.

>>79166723
Funny this gets posted. I saw JW a couple days after seeing Collateral for the first time. Maybe that's why it was a letdown. Collateral did the hitman drama thing so much better.

>>79165121
Critics liked the first one anon.

>>79167203
>>79167353
Yup, a total snorefest. Bland, without suspense, just a guy doing generic 'badass' moves and no bullet ever hitting him.
But if it manages to keep away from fake emotions and hysterical morals I will still watch it. I have no life I guess.

File: lWPdJ.png (90KB, 318x235px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 318x235px

>>79165496

Kino the scene

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-HSoOFdJ3s

File: IMG_0490.jpg (49KB, 450x650px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 450x650px

Find a flaw.

So what's the story in this one? I watched the first one and it was awesome, my gf cried when they killed the puppy and understood it was a man cooping with the fact that her girl died

File: 1486385458036.jpg (115KB, 800x814px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 800x814px

>>79167403
This makes me very happy.

>>79168226
...Is that a tattoo of archer on her stomach?

>>79165323
That's not how /tv/ works, rëddit. We just having patrician particles in our genes.

>>79168226
Degenerate tattoos, dropped.

>>79168396
Apparently he broke the rules in the first one... so he's just gonna kill everyone else involved (or something like that... I don't want plot spoilers)

>>79168466
sure looks like it

>>79168226

that stupid fucking archer tattoo

I hope Keanu is happy.

>>79167802
you guess?