why was "you know who" so evil ?

He was just born evil.

>>79159257
is it because he is white ?

>>79159271
absolutely

>>79159947
why are white people so evil then ?

>>79159215
Bad upbringing.

>>79159961
patriarchy

>>79159215
Dullest franchise to blame.

File: Smash_Patriarchy_Slut_Walk_2014_Chicago_Feminist.jpg (116KB, 870x494px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 870x494px

>>79159973
smash the patriarchy then

File: patriarchy86540261_n.jpg (26KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 500x330px

>>79159998
Patriarchy fuck yeah !

>>79159961
they are just born evil

File: 1447824447102.jpg (30KB, 362x282px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 362x282px

>>79159215

wtf is happening in this thread ?

File: image.jpg (1MB, 1594x2857px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1594x2857px

>>79159215
Because he's a part of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises.

Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>79160580
Uncreative opening.

File: 1439997461822.jpg (27KB, 398x348px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 398x348px

>>79160580
that's the spirit

>>79160580
This fucking meme...

>>79160580
I started to get worried that you wouldn't make it

>>79160752
4 (you)

>>79160580
be more creative please. you're losing your touch

>>79160712
"you know who" will bend the knee or he will destroy him ?

He was a rape baby

>>79161302
like darth vador ?

>>79160580
based pusyposter

My headcanon is that the books are memoirs written by someone close to Harry and thus painting Voldemort as some soulless monster. In reality he was a powerful wizard that saw a weak and dwindling wizard society and saw the Ministry as corrupt and degenerate.

He was a rape baby and his mom Padme'd herself.

>>79160580
>"No!"

Everytime