Black could be anywhere!

WHO THE FUCK IS THIS

PAGIN' ME AT FIVE FORTY SIX IN THE MORNIN'

CRACK OF DAWN N

NOW I'M YAWNIN'

123456789


It's the ten crack commandments

>>79157991
WHATS THE GRIM

>>79157991
IT WAS ALL A DREAM

File: serveimage.gif (1MB, 615x257px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 615x257px

>Harry: She's got nice skin
>Ron: Skin? You're saying that filthy nigger IS dating my sister because of her pure, pale skin? And everyone else is okay with this? I knew that these pavement apes were out to get us. Why couldn't he have settled with one of those street shitters, the Patil's?
Christ, Yates.

>>79157991
ISSA OMEN

OF DEFF

File: dullest.jpg (1MB, 1596x2867px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1596x2867px

Where else could Black be but trapped in one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>79158275
good intro but it took 23 minutes

get it together next time

File: Voldemort_vision.jpg (5KB, 296x332px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 296x332px

deh

>>79158275
If I go even a few days without seeing this pasta or some variation of it I might just kill myself.

>>79158361
Kino

>>79158275
godard was once a maoist who championed the murderous ideology of mao zedong and the khmer rouge. we condemn griffith and riefenstahl of their political sins, but griffith serioiusly tried to prove he was not a hater after 'birth of a nation'. and riefenstahl insisted she loathed nazism but had simply done as told. maybe they were full of shit but at least they tried to publicly distance themselves from extreme politics.

not godard who espoused the most extreme, murderous, and destructive form of leftism. film scholars, so outraged about long dead griffith and long irrelevant riefenstahl, never demanded of godard to face up to his past sins. unlike kurosawa and bergman who candidly confessed their cowardice in face or approval of, respectively, japanese militarism and nazism, godard has never ever apologized in general, or in specific to the countless victims of the tyrants he supported with all his heart.

godard celebrated and championed mao's total destruction of culture and intellectual life and the khmer rouge that transformed camodia overnight into a genocidal stone age marxist state. fuck that piece of shit.