Remakes Far Superior to the Original

>>79124860

The guy who designed it did it without any knowledge of the film.

>>79124910
He did a great job

Could be something about you not knowing the guy's identity. He might be a threat - which is one of the issues in the film.

... but yeah, it's not a great poster when it comes to portraying the film.

The Dark Knight

Was it really a remake? It's more of a closer adaptation of the book.

>>79125009
It's a pretty good poster on that front too, I would say. It's human-shaped and wearing clothes, but clearly not human because of the beam of light. It implies something otherworldly about this threat, which it kind of is. An eldritch abomination that we're still not sure the nature of.

Hopw did they fry the Saladman in the 51 version??

I thought Electricity was weak against Grass (plant), from Pokemon.

File: the-thing-56ffe2b3b2fbf.jpg (301KB, 1000x1426px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1000x1426px

>>79125097
Yeah, I might be a bit too harsh. If nothing else, it adds some mystery - the picture of the person goes well together with the title. It's not a person, it's a thing.
But I don't care for the tagline.

I think something like pic related would be better. A bit more subtle.

>>79125267
really makes your almonds activate

>>79125327
that poster wouldn't catch people's attention. the fear that the movie invokes is about the nature of humanity, below the alien-organism surface narrative.

>>79125327
this poster looks too exotic and peaceful, like paradise island, in the thumbnail

>>79124860

rob ager had a kind of okayish explenation of the poster. then again this guy sees meaning in almost everything no matter how unimportant it might be.

File: pepe.jpg (11KB, 243x208px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 243x208px

>>79124860
>Remakes Far Superior to the Original
>The guy who designed it did it without any knowledge of the film.
>yeah, it's not a great poster when it comes to portraying the film.
>that poster wouldn't catch people's attention.

>>79128140
I don't get your point Pepe. Why did you have to kill yourself before explaining further?

>>79125048
/thread

>>79125327
>A bit more subtle.

>DOG MENACINGLY EYEING A HUMAN SETTLEMENT WITH A "THE THING" CAPTION RIGHT NEXT TO IT
>THE DOG IS THE THING GET IT XDD
>1/3 poster is wasted black space

Yeha very subtle

Would you have sex with the Thing if it turned into a loli?

>>79129809

Do you know where you are? We'd have sex with any loli if we could

>>79127415
Literally this. A poster can't be so subtle that it only makes sense after watching the movie. That completely avoids what a poster is meant to do.

>>79124860
The Force has Awoken

>>79124860

OP is a faggot

>>79131821
you too!

>>79128140

Why are you upset about the poster talk when the OP brought up the poster and asked about it?

>>79130566
Good t aste