WELL DONE SLYTHERIN
WELL DONE
what did he mean by this?
really makes you think
it was a different time
what the FUCK was his problem?
I haven't seen a meme this dead in several days
>>79091686
HOWEVER
HOWEVER
>>79091701
Haha! thats what /tv/ sounds like!
THAT BEING SAID
RECENT EVENTS MUST BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT
>>79091686
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=351Aa5q_S98
KINO
>Slytherin be like "N-NANI? MASAKA?" and shit
But why didn't anyone crack down on Slytherin when it was obviously a recruiting ground for your extremists?
>>79094354
Imagine if they could playback the sorting hat's thoughts
>Hmmm you fantasize about rape-murder, do you? And have a strong desire to consume human flesh... SLYTHERIN!!
>>79091686
HOWEVER YOU'RE PART OF THE DULLEST FRANCHISES IN THE HISTORY OF MOVIE FRANCHISES. SERIOUSLY EACH EPISODE FOLLOWING THE BOY WIZARD AND HIS PALS FROM HOGWARTS ACADEMY AS THEY FIGHT ASSORTED VILLAINS HAS BEEN INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE OTHERS. ASIDE FROM THE GLOOMY IMAGERY, THE SERIES’ ONLY CONSISTENCY HAS BEEN ITS LACK OF EXCITEMENT AND INEFFECTIVE USE OF SPECIAL EFFECTS, ALL TO MAKE MAGIC UNMAGICAL, TO MAKE ACTION SEEM INERT.
PERHAPS THE DIE WAS CAST WHEN ROWLING VETOED THE IDEA OF SPIELBERG DIRECTING THE SERIES; SHE MADE SURE THE SERIES WOULD NEVER BE MISTAKEN FOR A WORK OF ART THAT MEANT ANYTHING TO ANYBODY?JUST RIDICULOUSLY PROFITABLE CROSS-PROMOTION FOR HER BOOKS. THE HARRY POTTER SERIES MIGHT BE ANTI-CHRISTIAN (OR NOT), BUT IT’S CERTAINLY THE ANTI-JAMES BOND SERIES IN ITS REFUSAL OF WONDER, BEAUTY AND EXCITEMENT. NO ONE WANTS TO FACE THAT FACT. NOW, THANKFULLY, THEY NO LONGER HAVE TO.
>A-AT LEAST THE BOOKS WERE GOOD THOUGH
"NO!"
THE WRITING IS DREADFUL; THE BOOK WAS TERRIBLE. AS I READ, I NOTICED THAT EVERY TIME A CHARACTER WENT FOR A WALK, THE AUTHOR WROTE INSTEAD THAT THE CHARACTER "STRETCHED HIS LEGS."
I BEGAN MARKING ON THE BACK OF AN ENVELOPE EVERY TIME THAT PHRASE WAS REPEATED. I STOPPED ONLY AFTER I HAD MARKED THE ENVELOPE SEVERAL DOZEN TIMES. I WAS INCREDULOUS. ROWLING'S MIND IS SO GOVERNED BY CLICHES AND DEAD METAPHORS THAT SHE HAS NO OTHER STYLE OF WRITING. LATER I READ A LAVISH, LOVING REVIEW OF HARRY POTTER BY THE SAME STEPHEN KING. HE WROTE SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF, "IF THESE KIDS ARE READING HARRY POTTER AT 11 OR 12, THEN WHEN THEY GET OLDER THEY WILL GO ON TO READ STEPHEN KING." AND HE WAS QUITE RIGHT. HE WAS NOT BEING IRONIC. WHEN YOU READ "HARRY POTTER" YOU ARE, IN FACT, TRAINED TO READ STEPHEN KING.
>>79094354
>But why didn't anyone crack down on Slytherin when it was obviously a recruiting ground for your extremists?
It's basically a ghetto, that way they can watch all the assholes in one place and make sure they don't influence the normal ones. It would be chaos without Slytherin.
>>79094480
>Ravenclaw... they should get a tower on the western side of the castle high up with magnificent views
>Hufflepuff, give them the warm cozy Hobbit-hole one floor below ground
>Gryffindor will also get a tower, even higher than the Ravenclaw
>And just stick the Slytherin in the dungeons and sewers lol who cares
>>79094580
That's a pretty good idea. That way the Slytherins have only one escape route, and you can flood them all with waters from the lake. Bravo Rowling
>>79094460
kek
nice transition
>>79094460
Will never get old
>>79094580
>>79094609
Still probably ever school shooter in the history of Hogwarts was a Hufflepuff.