ITT movies where the original (1982) is worse than the remake (2011)

File: CueX-FilesThemes.png (208KB, 546x246px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 546x246px

>>79088681
ahahahahahha

You must be blind to terrible CGI, which means u were born in like 2000.

The original is a master piece.

You just wanna jack off to MEW.

/bait rant over.

OP was born in the late 90s

Prove me wrong

>>79088681
pic unrelated

the longest yard.

>>79088734
I agree the first is a masterpiece and obviously better, but I wouldnt say the remake(that isn't actually a remake.) is a bad movie. I think its pretty good.

i only watched the remake for that mary winstad chick
god damnit id love to break my dong off between those thighs

File: Juliette.png (875KB, 1238x800px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 1238x800px

>>79089111
trips confirm

it's not terrible. the worst i can say about it is it's not as good as the original

>>79089121
this chick was qt too. she looks like a girl i had a crush on once except she was probably about a foot shorter

File: that's bait.webm (358KB, 1912x792px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1912x792px

>>79088681

>>79088681
>thing 1982
>the original

Both Things were great

The original was made in 1950s

>>79088715
first post best post
op is a fag

File: The_Birth_of_a_Nation_(2016_film).png (74KB, 259x384px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 259x384px

easy

>>79089320
no it wasn't you fag they didn't even have color films in 1950

File: MV5BNjI3OGRhYjUtZmY1MC00N2JlLWJjMDUtYmViNTE0NDA0NzZlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTI4MjkwNjA@._V1_.jpg (58KB, 478x755px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 478x755px

>>79088681
Remake is horror classic, original is accidental comedy.

>>79088681
Fuck you, millenial shit
its worse

>>79088681
2011 isn't a remake, iit's a prequel.
That being said, 2011 has that qt MEW so it's fine by me.