Find a flaw, /tv/

File: IMG_5585.jpg (31KB, 442x332px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 442x332px

>"you snakes, you brood of vipers"
>"you are sons of your father, the devil, and he was a murderer from the beginning"

What did Jesus mean by this?

too much blood

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_ZNoPONhqw

File: passion.jpg (265KB, 628x403px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 628x403px

>get on with it motherfucker

Mel was truly ahead of his time

>When they played "Whip It" by Devo over that flogging scene

The song wouldn't have come out until 1980, totally inappropriate.

Overlong gore porn that has virtually no rewatch value. 6/10 is fair.

Spoopiest Satan ever shown. None of those massive horns, crimson skin and horse legs. Just a plain pale manlet babby.

based Mel

File: 1481805749873.jpg (84KB, 544x626px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 544x626px

>>79089661
>When asked why he portrayed Satan—an androgynous, almost beautiful being played by Rosalinda Celentano—the way he did, Gibson replied: "I believe the Devil is real, but I don't believe he shows up too often with horns and smoke and a forked tail. The devil is smarter than that. Evil is alluring, attractive. It looks almost normal, almost good—but not quite.

>"That's what I tried to do with the Devil in the film. The actor's face is symmetric, beautiful in a certain sense, but not completely. For example, we shaved her eyebrows. Then we shot her almost in slow motion so you don't see her blink—that's not normal. We dubbed in a man's voice in Gethsemane even though the actor is a woman … That's what evil is about, taking something that's good and twisting it a little bit."

>But what about the ugly baby? "Again," said Gibson, "it's evil distorting what's good. What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child? So the Devil takes that and distorts it just a little bit. Instead of a normal mother and child you have an androgynous figure holding a 40-year-old 'baby' with hair on his back. It is weird, it is shocking, it's almost too much—just like turning Jesus over to continue scourging him on his chest is shocking and almost too much, which is the exact moment when this appearance of the Devil and the baby takes place."

>>79089871
KINO
I
N
O

>>79089475
t. Yitzhak Rosenblatt

>>79089871
Why weren't the Romans flogging that "baby" instead?

>>79088582
it is a movie about religion that held us back in the dark middle ages and continues to do so even now
not to mention all the pedophiles in Vatican

>>79089871
>I believe the Devil is real
what?