Thoughts?
>civil war
>no casualties
What did Marvel mean by this?
>>79068924
it means all the characters are planned to appear in future movies up till 2030, it's really a meta spoiler
>>79068924
>no casualties
People were killed though.
>>79069083
the movie addresss the issue of superheros fights has too many collateral damage by creating more collateral damages
what do they mean by this?
>7 niggas get killed in africa = no mo supaheros
>70 million nigga die from aids = no biggie
wat does amerikuka mean by this?
>>79068496
It was fine, but pretty bland and forgettable. Honestly, it's a dead-in-the-middle 5/10.
I'm not a fan of the Russo brothers or their take on Captain America. "The First Avenger" is one of my favorite Marvel films, but these new directors have brought the whole thing downhill
>>79069123
aids isn't a superhero
Incredibly forgetful movie that just rips off the finale from its predecessor
I was hoping it would be decent but Joss Sweden really is one of the worst directors alive
>>79069179
Captain AIDS and the HIVteers disagree!
oh russos
>>79068496
final nail in the coffin for me tolerating marvel movies. I'll only see GoTG2 because I love the cast/chars and its upfront about what it is, its not pretending. Even the action was a joke in this pos. BvS was genuinely a better visual treat no meme.