Blunder of the century?

>0%
Fucking hell. How is it even possible to make a film that bad with a budget over $10m? That's Manos: Hands of Fate levels of bad.

File: 1472453690249.png (283KB, 623x469px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 623x469px

>its a stupid americans try to do nippon horror and fail miserably episode

How many times are they going to rehash this shit? Serves them well.

>>79060301
Anything less than a 6/10 is rotten, right?
That's impressive as fuck, there's usually at least one critic who'll have shit taste.

>62
Yeah, right.

>>79060387
It just means it had zero positve reviews from approved critics.
Rotten tomatoes doesnt work like metacritic and im sick of that shitty site being used as bait.

>>79060301
kek, my friend saw a screening of this last night and he hated it

>>79060418
The 2.5 average is almost more impressive. That means not only did not one single critic think it was worth above a 6/10, they didn't even think it was worth anything close to a 6/10.

It's actually only 5 reviews but sure.

>>79060437
Doesn't have a Metascore yet, but the average implies it'll be in the 20s.

One of the writers for this also worked on Batman and Robin.
So yeah.

>>79060301
Maybe the top critics died.

>>79060987
>implying Batman and Robin is bad
how does it feel to be a massive pleb

>>79060454
Well, time for /tv/ and armond to start singing its praises

>>79060301
>FIRST YOU WATCH IT THEN YOU DIE

10/10 tagline

>>79061593
Don't give them ideas

>>79061571
It feels quite... ICE!

>>79061622
That's more like it

>>79061610
First they're sour, then they're sweet!

>>79060301
That's not Hillary's presidential campaign.

>>79061677
>we'll never get a movie dramatisation of her campaign titled 'She blew it'

File: Rust_Cohle_2012.jpg (75KB, 408x296px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 408x296px

>>79060301
>have the 1st chapter as a fucking template
>make everything wrong

>le creepy girl meme

this is so fucking 2008 or something.

when i was a kid i wondered what kind of cool horror films we would have in 2020. genre is fucking stagnated, there isnt a single original story or something that looks conceived in a different decade (as when you compare 70s horror with 80s horror), all 2010 shit is 90s trash conceptually.

File: oh shit.png (5KB, 517x48px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 517x48px

>when you see it

>>79061677
>got 60% of (audience) votes
>lost because of the electoral college
Sounds about right.

>>79060400
The original Ring remake wasn't bad.

>>79061840
Is this a drake reference

>>79061999
no its satan reference

nice trips btw

>>79060301
>0%
Well if only 10 reviews are out
>62 reviews
Holy fucking shit.

>successful horror film
>gets remade years later and released in January/February
>is complete shit
IT KEEPS HAPPENING

>>79062016
I just went on the RT page and there's only 7 reviews out, so far.

>>79062111
8 now. still 0%

>>79061985
This
Directed by the guy who did Pirates of the Caribbean, turned out bretty gud.

It's one of my top mystery/thrillers with a horror spin.

>>79060301
>The Ring comes out
>good, successful
>let's make The Ring 2
>sucks, is bad, bombs
>hey i got a really great idea
>let's make a third one

Hollywood brain factory at work

>>79060432
>>79060458
>>79062111
>>79062351
>doesn't understand how RT works

File: 1436567258501.jpg.89fd4a92d0ff5214184872e9ec505109.jpg (29KB, 640x519px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x519px

>>79060301
>People have to stay alive after watching a cursed video tape
I like these stories. This cant be that bad?

>>79062382
>He hasnt watched the Japanese Rings
Why are Americans so stupid?

The Japanese sequels did pretty well so I guess the Americans decided to do a 3rd one and see if they could improve

>>79062387
Watch the original weeb version and first American remake instead.

>>79062382
i think they retconned ring 2 and just made another ring sequel as well. so they thought ring 2 wasn't bad enough, wanted to make one worse.

>50+ rotten reviews
>no consensus

>2-3 fresh reviews
>instant consensus

...

>>79062386
elaborate.

>>79062405
>le Japan does everything so much better why r Amerikkkans so dumb xD?

Lemme tell you リング is pretty overrated.

>>79062374
Agreed. That's why I love the original Ring so much. It's really just a mystery story with a supernatural spin

>>79062453
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/

TEXT

OVER

POSTER

>>79062413
Seen the weeb one and the weeb sequel.

Great films

This is edited. There haven't been 62 reviews, only 10.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

ROTTEN TOMATOES IS LITERALLY AN AGGREGATOR.

THEY LOOK AT ALL REVIEWS, IF THEY'RE BELOW 6/10 THEN THEY'RE 'ROTTEN'. THEY THEN PUT THIS INFORMATION ON ONE SITE.

THE 0% MEANS THAT NO REVIEW WAS ABOVE 6/10. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THE FILM IS 0/100 0% OR WHATEVER QUALITY.

>>79062531
Why are you angry? It still says right there that the average rating is 2.5/10 you fucking autist

>>79062551
BECAUSE PEOPLE DO THIS EVERY THREAD ABOUT RT. THEY SEE THE 0% AND THINK THAT'S IT'S QUALITY.

Dumb fuck kys cuck redditor... err... what else?

>>79062510
no, elaborate on why you don't think i understand how RT works.

>>79061709
It Follows was not that bad tho. It felt like an oldschool movie.

>>79062531
>THAT DOES NOT MEAN THE FILM IS 0/100 0% OR WHATEVER QUALITY.
Actually, it does mean it is 0% fresh. Basically, no one thought much of it.

>>79062567
>THEY SEE THE 0% AND THINK THAT'S IT'S QUALITY.
...no ones thinks 0% is quality.

>>79062569
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotten_Tomatoes#Tomatometer_critic_aggregate_score

>>79062634
and? i am well aware of this. my post did not say otherwise.

>>79062656
kys libcuck redditor

I saw a commercial the other day and I thought it was a parody movie that was way fucking late.

They need to make a 4th one and call it "Son of Ring" and actually make it a comedy.

>>79062689
ah, i see. you're one of those. carry on then.

>>79062634
You really are an idiot, aren't you. Explaining how the tomato meter works does nothing.

Not one of the initial posts were even about the score. They were just pointing out that the amount of reviews was edited.

Never understood why some fucker didnt just play the cursed clip on youtube, or set it as a clickbait advert. This is the 21st century FFS, not the 80s.

File: samara puppet 1k.png (1MB, 1633x788px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1633x788px

>>79061985
the Gore Verbinski remake was amazing. Way better than the Japanese movie.

I watched all the Ring films, the Japanese ones are weird because they change the lore in every film. You never get the same Sadako twice. In the most recent Sadako 3D films, instead of a cursed tape it's a cursed youtube video, and Sadako is like a weird crab monster, and there's like 40 of her. This Rings film looks pretty terrible, but Japan has set the bar pretty fucking low.

>>79062779
The amount of reviews has to do with what score it gets.
A film with 62 reviews, all of which are under 6/10, will make the movie get a 0% score. (Which it did in this case.)

Don't bother replying cause you know I've won.

>>79062387
Take Facebook frog back to read it loser.

Maybe all the top reviewers got killed by Sadako after watching the movie

>>79060301
>Blunder of the century
Never leave /v/ again

Is Naomi Watts in this?

Also /TV loves this now because le contrarian right?

>>79061969
electoral college is fair.

>>79061985

The sequel was awful

>deers are scary

>>79060987
>4 years later wins best adapted screenplay for a beautiful mind

how did he do it

>>79061593
Armond is working on a wordy, pseudo-intellectual review that says absolutely nothing about the film as we speak

>>79061999
TURN THE 6 UPSIDE DOWN IT'S A 9 NOW

The studio doesn't care. They just made the movie to retain the rights. Teens will see it.

Horror is 10x more overexposed than capeshit is and that's saying a lot.

The only time it had a shot in the arm was the Sixth Sense, the Grudge and Ring 1. That was 20 years ago BTW.

>Imagine eating wallpaper paste, listening to Coldplay and watching the entire 'Da Vinci Code' trilogy back to back. Still less boring than 'Rings'.

>>79063606
Who are you quoting?

>>79060387
IIRC Manos was made by a no-budget no-experience filmmaker. Whereas Rings has major studio support but calculated profit-loss, total difference

>>79063229
Certain people having their votes count as more because of sex, gender, race, or location, literally goes against democracy and fairness. You're just okay with it now because your prefered canidate won because of it.

>>79063647
Tom Huddleston

>>79063770
And having California decide what's best for the other 49 states is more fair?

>>79064072
NTG,
California is full of people from every other state, so yeah.

>>79063690
That's why I said with over $10m budget. They managed to make a movie with as it stands a not much higher average rating than Manos, despite a much larger budget. Hell, Manos was originally made as a bet that the director couldn't make a movie on an extremely low budget, so at least it kind of has an excuse. I read an article written by the actress who played the little girl once, the making of would make a pretty interesting documentary.

Isn't it incredibly surprising that MORE movies aren't at 0% based on the way RT works?

File: 1428204089685.gif (1018KB, 337x253px) Image search: [Google]

1018KB, 337x253px

>>79063770
>sex, gender, race, or location
actually, only just one of those. But nice NIIIIIICE baiting.

>>79060301
Thank god I saw this, I was actually going to go see this tonight. Not anymore.

>>79060301
>Aimee Teegarden

Just

>>79064072
Maybe individuals should matter more than states.

File: 1485141876609.jpg (14KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 320x320px

>Ctrl+f all reviews
>No mention of how this is Trumps fault.

Something isn't right.

>2.6

That's actually pretty fucking bad

>>79064672
>3 months since the election ended
>Trump fanboys still can't resist bringing him up every damn chance they get.
Y'all are pathetic.

0 out of 62 is shockingly bad, especially for a teeny horror movie.

The Forest and LIghts Out got better ratings than that, and they really stunk.

>>79064363
No. Movies are very subjective. Somebody somewhere is probably going to give it an OK review, even if it really stinks.

So a 0% of a 100% are exceptionally rare.

File: 1484763441422.jpg (103KB, 960x796px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 960x796px

>>79064919

>>79064919
you just brought him up aswell though, can you get over it?

>>79064919
I don't even get why people think it's still about the election.

He's been in office two weeks now, and every day brings new fuck-ups. Just this morning his adviser was ranting about some huge terrorist massacre in Kentucky that never actually happened.

>>79063055
dat ass

>>79060400
>Ring Two was directed by the guy who made the original jap ring

>>79065065
#StandWithBowlingGreen

>>79060301
Still less retarded than that Japanese Grunge vs. Ring movie. That shit was inexcusable.

>>79064919
>people mention the current president
>this is a problem for some reason.

Okay? I mean, if he had lost, sure you could accuse Trump supporters of not moving on. Meanwhile, you weirdos are out there having actually alternate history fanfiction on how life would be different if Hillary were president. I hated both candidates, but you know who wouldn't have staged a massive March on DC protesting a completely legal and Democratically elected candidate for the sole reason that he won? Spoilers: the same people who didn't stage massive protests on DC after the last election.

>>79062480
>Japan does everything so much better

This is an objective fact though

>>79066819
>Meanwhile, you weirdos are out there having actually alternate history fanfiction on how life would be different if Hillary were president.
Really? How the do you figure that? I posted a thread about the horror movie Rings, not American politics. Get the fuck out.

>>people mention the current president
>>this is a problem for some reason.
This is a problem, cause it has nothing to do with Television & Film.

They released the first 3 months of this turd online already

ITS SHIT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCjBkdFbglg

>>79067329
>The first 3 months

Holy shit this movie lasts a year?