[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Why do people who don't understand film still offer up their

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 114
Thread images: 27

File: TND 'Review' 1.jpg (23KB, 353x209px) Image search: [Google]
TND 'Review' 1.jpg
23KB, 353x209px
Why do people who don't understand film still offer up their useless opinions on it?
>>
>>78991079
>Why do people who don't understand film still offer up their useless opinions on it?
My friend that is the entire reason /tv/ exists
>>
File: TND 'Review' 2.jpg (23KB, 358x216px) Image search: [Google]
TND 'Review' 2.jpg
23KB, 358x216px
>>78991098
But like... look at this. Could you not understand it any harder?
>>
File: 1464434736826.jpg (154KB, 470x475px) Image search: [Google]
1464434736826.jpg
154KB, 470x475px
>>78991079
> top critic
>>
>>78991119
I feel like this is a good opinion but said in the most reductive and retarded way possible.

Is all gore "horror material" now?
>>
>>78991079
>>78991119
Impressive. Is as if someone asked my aunt to write a review. Also, I fail to understand where the "mansplaining" is. At least, my aunt would dismiss the word "mansplaining" as bullshit.
>>
File: TND 'Review' 3.jpg (27KB, 352x223px) Image search: [Google]
TND 'Review' 3.jpg
27KB, 352x223px
>>78991244
Here's one from your Uncle, too
>>
>>78991119
I agree with this though. I'm sure her full review is about feminism or something but this snippet is pretty accurate.
>>
File: refn defence force.jpg (226KB, 1872x796px) Image search: [Google]
refn defence force.jpg
226KB, 1872x796px
>itt
>>
>>78991244
>I fail to understand where the "mansplaining" is.
Director portrayed models as evil.
>>
>>78991413
How is saying that it's unfunny a criticism? It's not meant to be funny. It's meant to be shocking, but only to complete the metaphor. It's not hard to understand and it's so tight that i don't understand why anyone would be actually angry about it.

>>78991427
He just does simple concepts and brings them to life vividly. It's really not that deep...
>>
>>78991079
>mansplaining

Maybe she could womansplain it better
>>
>>78991079
>>78991119
I don't try to be sexist, but women shouldn't write reviews.
>>
>>78991079
>Why do people who don't understand film still offer up their useless opinions on it?

The point of a critic is to offer an opinion on films. This includes "the idiots opinion". And if the majority of their readers are equally as illiterate when it comes to understanding movies. The critic is doing their job well.
>>
File: TND 'Review' 4.jpg (34KB, 570x148px) Image search: [Google]
TND 'Review' 4.jpg
34KB, 570x148px
I mean seriously, what the fuck did he mean by this. Can he seriously not analyse a film past it's plot and acting?
>>
>>78991079
I don't know. Why do people review books they never finished?
>>
>>78991079
because writer in uk knows so mush about fashion world of los angeles? whole point of "mensplaning" is a man explain to a woman something she already knows and doing it in a condescending fashion, yet who would that apply to a movie that has male audience and whos "speaking" is not directed at any specific individual
>>
>>78991129
This shit made me laugh like fuck
>>
>>78991119
TND, Tomorrow Never Dies? visually cool things can't be funny? is she saying it takes itself too seriously?
>>
File: Untitled.png (43KB, 791x659px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
43KB, 791x659px
>>78991244
>mansplaining
word that needs to die. along with fuckboi,bae,on flick and rest of this nu-language
>>
>>78991700
point of a layman critic is to offer up opinion. profanation critic who gets paid should be preforming analysis of everything from symbology,film history to genre trends,affordability/worth.
>>
>>78991834
>devoid of human interest
What does this mean? people went to see it so obviously their is human interest, does he mean that since the movie is about bitches there is no human paragon of virtue to back?
>>
>>78992076
read a book or two
>>
>>78991943
The Neon Demon.
>>
>>78992085
explain it to me
>>
File: 342943891093485.jpg (68KB, 960x695px) Image search: [Google]
342943891093485.jpg
68KB, 960x695px
>>78991974
>no mention of cuck, Jew, parentheses, shill

Gee, I wonder who could be behind this post.
>>
>>78991244
>>78991557
>>78991906
>>78991974
Couldn't a feminist interpretation be that the thing that causes the women to act like this is the male gaze? Therefore the movie is showing the damaging effects of the patriarchy on young people. But no, why bother thinking about anything that hard I guess.
>>
>>78991079
>mansplaining
>top critic
>>
File: dog-filter.jpg (13KB, 236x348px) Image search: [Google]
dog-filter.jpg
13KB, 236x348px
>>78992130
all of that is mostly contained one or 2 sites while the other shit is everywhere in the outside world. also must I list every word, can they fall under the rest?
>>
>>78992142
That's literally hammered into the plot of the film. There's like 3 occasions where the models are hanging on the words of a photographer like their gospel and clearly claw at one another in order to gain their approval. It's like the OP reviewer wasn't even watching the same fucking movie
>>
File: Untitled.png (45KB, 587x540px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
45KB, 587x540px
>>78992142
a lot of modern offensive things are only offensive from a certain point of view/with a specific interpretation. when there are other interpretations the writer will go for the offensive one because it lest them write a post/article and get views/cash
>>
>>78992182
Yeah i have to agree, just considering that one scene where the two guys are talking about whether natural or unnatural beauty looks better. That's pretty much the motivation right there for that American girl to want to kill her. God these reviewers are fucking stupid.
>>
>>78991304
>He gets the movie
>For him the point of the movie is its problem

I have to talk with my uncle Peter
>>
File: 12 year donkey.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
12 year donkey.jpg
9KB, 480x360px
>>78991079
I think she just wanted the opportunity to use "mansplaining".
>>
>>78992182
yep, but if the movie is not ADVERTISED as having such aspect, is overlooked.
Anyone could be a critic nowadays.
>>
>>78992130
Who?
>>
Not a single word on how we're supposed to believe Elle Fanning could ever be a model ?
>>
File: 1413242041354.jpg (149KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]
1413242041354.jpg
149KB, 1440x810px
>>78992375
>>
>>78992130
>rightist
0 effort eh
>>
File: molly bair.jpg (107KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]
molly bair.jpg
107KB, 640x640px
>>78992396

Molly Bair is a model. Sure that raises more questions but Elle's fine..
>>
>>78992420
ayy lmao
>>
File: 1485908694833.jpg (73KB, 510x525px) Image search: [Google]
1485908694833.jpg
73KB, 510x525px
>>78992404
>>78992413
Shaking in my boots
>>
>>78992130
are you implying alt-right is not closer to conservatives than liberals?
>implying milo is not based
>>
>>78992495
>implying milo is not based

yeah, praise kek xddd
>>
>>78992527
What is there not to like about him?
>>
File: rca.jpg (51KB, 599x405px) Image search: [Google]
rca.jpg
51KB, 599x405px
>>78992447
>>
File: 1464837920984.png (20KB, 658x643px) Image search: [Google]
1464837920984.png
20KB, 658x643px
>>78992583
>>
>>78992603
>>
File: good night white pride.jpg (245KB, 628x628px) Image search: [Google]
good night white pride.jpg
245KB, 628x628px
>>78992603
.
>>
>>78992603
hitler is at the gate
>>
>can't try to see what the director has created through their eyes
>instead tries to jam it in their own worldview

modern """"""critics""""""
>>
>>78991079
>mansplaining

Did she just cuntsplain to me what the director was doing with his movie?
>>
>>78991079
Anon your problem is that you care. Stop giving a shit
>>
>>78992703
anon does not care, he reposts for (you)s
>>
>>78992613
>>78992640
>>78992666
Is this supposed to be intimidating? You sissies are all talk, I went to a few rallies armed, and not one of you masked homos approached me. Come on, give me an excuse to put a bullet in your brain
>>
>>78991079
>mansplaining
>top critic

Lately I've been disagreeing with RT ratings quite a lot but this is it, I'm done with RT.
>>
>>78991079
>mansplaining fashion
Oh honey, most of the clothing in your closet was designed by men.
>>
>>78992613

>antifa
>on 4chan

Do you know where you are?
>>
>>78992130
Jew is a new slang word?
Shill wasn't used by /v/ for nearly a decade?
>>
>>78992613>>78992640>>78992666
>white pride is something to be surpressed
What do (((they))) mean by this?
>>
>>78991079
what language does she speak? "mansplaining" is some feminist made up word for "complaining"?
>>
>>78993158
No. It's when a man gets so exasperated with how dimwitted a woman is that he explains matters to her in the simplest terms possible. And sometimes they catch on to that and are pissed about it.
>>
>>78992520
>>78992537
>>78992583
what education or lack of it these autists had?

can't recognize they're more fascists than any healthily racists normal person?
>>
>>78992085
if you can't explain it simple, you don't understand it either
>>
>>78992703
How do i do that. I wanted to see what the discourse was regarding this film and it's all just bullshit. Makes me see how some people have given up on film as an artform.
>>
File: C225aKBXEAAW-fB-860x1024[1].jpg (116KB, 860x1024px) Image search: [Google]
C225aKBXEAAW-fB-860x1024[1].jpg
116KB, 860x1024px
>>78992784
>all talk
>>
>>78993277
They genuinely can't realise how fascist they are. Advocating violence against people with a differing viewpoint, wanting everyone on your side freed, because 'they were doing the right thing'. Sounds like the early days of the Nazis to me.
>>
How did my thread become a haven for Nazis?
>>
>>78992142
That's what grinds my gears about some of these feminist reviews.

Some SJWs keep criticizing Game of Thrones because violence against womyn and misogyny, but isn't the actual point of the show/books that the patriarchal world they live in is not good? You're not supposed to think violence/rape/prejudice against women is something good in the series. These retards can't see the difference between condoning something and being critical of something.
>>
>>78993767
could we recover it saying that 90% of critics should be gassed?
>>
>>78994043
>Some SJWs keep criticizing Game of Thrones because violence against womyn and misogyny
Are you fucking kidding me. I bet some of them had a problem with the fact that the women in Fury Road were wearing sexually appealing clothing.

>>78994045
Yeah i'll buy it
>>
>>78992495
Milo sucks. he's a walking contradiction.
>>
>>78993277
You can't even write properly so I don't know why you're acting all high and mighty
>>
>>78993359
All talk except when they outnumber you 20 to 1 or they're sneaking up behind you and running away as fast as possible.
Liberalism is the religion of pussies.
>>
>>78995405
don't change subject,
also, it's not my first language
>>
>>78995686
>also, it's not my first language
Not an argument
>>
>The whole second part of this thread is all off-topic shit

can you electionfags fuck off back to whatever hole you crawled out of
>>
>>78995758
Yeah man it's so fucking annoying
>>
>>78995758
OP here, maybe start posting more examples of terrible film 'journalism' and they'll go away
>>
>>78991079
Critic is the most overrated job. They sit around and mock others work. It would at least make sense for someone who has worked in the medium to be a critic but not for some random nobody.
>>
>>78995946
How do we regulate them.
>>
>>78991098
I guarantee that some hobbyists on /tv/ know more about films than most professional """critics""" on websites like this.
>>
>>78992613
>>78992640
>>78992666
This is just sad and embarrassing this many memes are out there.
>>
>>78996422
Oh for absolutely sure. And that's not even taking into account the aspiring directors and film school students who take this shit seriously and know what the fuck they're talking about.
>>
>>78991119
>fatally unfunny

I thought it was fucking hilarious, what is this one about? The extents of inhumanity this film goes about while trying to keep the style, the telegraphed imagery and so on.
>>
>>78991079
A glib facsimile
>>
>movie shows beautiful white women
>leftie critics hate it

Really made me think.
>>
File: Flick Filosopher.png (282KB, 976x688px) Image search: [Google]
Flick Filosopher.png
282KB, 976x688px
>>
>>78996723
Does she even know what those words mean?
>>
File: TND 'Review' 5.jpg (90KB, 793x302px) Image search: [Google]
TND 'Review' 5.jpg
90KB, 793x302px
>>78991119
She reaaaally didn't fucking get it did she
>>
>>78996831
Really made me meno-pause for a second and think
>>
>>78996723
So if I call flicks fascist, does that make me a philosopher?
>>
>>78991079
>Top Critic
>mansplaining

Just end it already, critics were a mistake
>>
>>78996800
>they had a polite laugh at my shitty joke
>now im 100% sure they are nice people.
you have to be lobotomized to think anything about neon demon is "politically incorrect"
>>
File: D-K.png (206KB, 1000x1338px) Image search: [Google]
D-K.png
206KB, 1000x1338px
>>78991079
>>
File: 32342.png (638KB, 1280x536px) Image search: [Google]
32342.png
638KB, 1280x536px
>>78996831
>>
>>78992583
Why hide your face if you're the good guy?
>>
>>78996800
how different would the review look if those 2 women had insulted her or in some way mad her feel like shit.
>>
>>78996723
>fascism is just a prevailing attitude, not a defined form of political leadership
>>
>>78997016
Whats the point of hiding your face when you live in a small town and have a distinct green hair.
>>
>>78992571
Loudmouth vulture on society sticking to whatever side of the story he needs to that will get people to say his name. Fake blond, and more full of himself than cock.
>>
>>78997100
true but he is a talking head, its not like he is an elected official.
>>
>>78992171
BE GONE THOT
>>
>>78992130

>Oh yes pls peg me feminists
Pathetic.
>>
>>78991079
idk, why do you?
>>
Can I get a female ITT to femalsplain the word "mansplain" please?

Thanks in advance
>>
>>78991304
This is the worst thing in the world. I read a review for Childhood of A Leader that was similar. They say something like "x was really vague, I wonder if it was at all related to y due to the scene where it's established that x leads to y. But if it was, it wasn't clear. I also didn't like [reasons that clearly lead to A], it was stupid. And then A happened with no explanation"
Like holy fuck, is this the first film you've ever seen that wasn't capeshit?

And these writers get paid for this shit
>>
>>78991834
>why are a group of models so vain and cold?
>Why did Elle turn into such a bitch after becoming a model?
>what did Refn mean by having the models eat Elle Fanning? I wonder if the models were supposed to be representative of the industry...?
>>
>>78996723
>tough, unanswerable, human questions
"Hey, should we, superheroes, be held responsible for all the damage we cause when we act as vigilantes in foreign territories?"
"Let's have a tension-less series of fights to decide"
>>
Tbqh I didn't get the film either but that is because I dismissed it as another Refn movie with weird style and didn't bother to put thought into it.
On the other hand I am not paid to review movies, so yeah...
However isn't that a sort of philosophical matter of aesthetics? Does the artist's intention count at all when his intention doesn't come off to some people? Rotten tomatoes and its top critics review films not as art but as entertainment, they just sometimes rate down flicks for the illusion of decency and just criticique. TND is certainly not entertaining to the middle-brow. This review is for them, the average movie goer and it's negativity is justified to me.
Now why anyone would be dumb enough to not dismiss such critic when reading such a dumb review is beyond me... I keep wondering how do the sites that hire these critics even survive and what visitors they have...
>>
>>78997542
The people that pay attention to these reviews never actually watch the film in question. So this lets them have an opinion on the film without watching it.
These critics are essentially paid to tell other people what to think about certain films.

That's why they're nice to disney films, because every-day people watch and enjoy them. And that's why they were so upset when so many people saw Suicide Squad because it let the average person see through their shit
>>
>>78997535
and in the end they decide to just do both.
>>
>>78997591
>having opinion on things you did not watch/read
garbage people
>>
>>78992583
>>78992613
>>78992640
>>78992666
>>78993359
guys stop fucking triggering antifa-tards, they spam shit & ruin threads
Thread posts: 114
Thread images: 27


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.