Did anyone saw it already? How is it? Shite or actually at least on not much worse than original.
>>78941541
>shite
t. Dylan Matthews from Minnesota
It's good. Plenty wrong with it though
Don't watch the trailer if you want all the cool visual shit spoiled for you.
Its pretty good. Very comfy.
>>78941571
>Plenty wrong with it though
Just for interest, without spoilers what's wrong about it?
>>78941820
Describing my gripes without spoilers is a little tough, I'll just say the story is unsatisfying in places, it goes for fan service a little too often, and one of the supporting characters from the first film is needlessly shoehorned in.
You'll probably know what I mean whenever you get to see it (March for US, yikes) but don't let me dissuade you. It's really fucking good for a sequel to a 21 year old film and the soundtrack is great.
>>78941541
I found it very enjoyable to watch but the more I thought about it afterwards the more problems I had with it. Still, it's a pretty solid film on the whole with some really nice visuals and music. It's nowhere near as good as the original but it works as a nostalgic, poignant epilogue and doesn't really try to be much more.
I liked it a lot. Would recommend.
I thoroughly enjoyed it. It's doesn't pack the same grimy, harrowing gut-punch that the first one did, but it's definitely a well done and emotional sequel. You can tell they put a lot of heart into it.
I liked it more than the original
>>78941541
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fe_8yIZyDBU
haven't watched it by the way
I liked it, I could see where some of the influence from Porno came in but a lot of it ended up rather unexpected. Pretty fan-servicey but I think the theme of the film is people being caught up in looking backwards for comfortable nostalgia, so it fits.Free Begbie. Man had been betrayed and played by Renton, then Sick Boy, really him and Spud were the only decent ones.