why isn't nobody talking about this? seems like a comfy flick

jfc at those pasted-on heads

and they monkified the hell out of freeman's face kek

>>78906822
>monkified

why is this board so racist wtf

File: t3_tohxa.png (115KB, 1197x353px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1197x353px

>>78906937
just look at it

looks like those old double nigger /b/ threads

File: 1270839290246.jpg (79KB, 406x390px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 406x390px

>>78907339
>2012
>old

>>78907393
2012 was 5 years ago anon

File: 1270839290232.jpg (28KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 160x160px

>>78907518

>>78906772
from the thumbnail i thought it was the grand tour

File: 1485052042852.jpg (1MB, 900x1391px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x1391px

>>78907518
that's right, it's 2017 now!

>>78906772
I saw the trailer and it does look comfy.

>>78906772
Seriously who the fuck watches movies with main casts of only old people? Old people?

Looks fun but it'll flop because it is original and not part of a franchise or a sequel

File: 658709698.jpg (268KB, 1003x1500px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1003x1500px

>>78908909
It's a remake. Of a damn good movie, i have to say...

>>78909022
Exactly. I loved this film and I can't believe they're redoing it.

I like these movies with old actors, they're really comfy af

>>78909022

I stand corrected.

What the fuck happened man? I thought the whole "everything's a sequel, reboot, or remake" thing was just a meme?

>>78909296
It's deinitely not a meme, but these kind of remakes don't smell that much of "cash grab shit". After all, "Going in Style" is not exactly a popular movie. I want to see this, it's the same story, yes, but in a different era and with a different (and excellent) cast.

My only complain: the poster SUCKS.
Compare >>78906772 with >>78909022 and take notice of the lazyness and lack of creativity of movie posters nowadays.

at least it doesn't look as bad as the other zach braff directed movies