ITT literally 10/10 movies. Pic related.

File: 1485189178111.jpg (3MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1588x2862px

>>78894174

>>78894574
Thats some horrible taste you have there

>>78894574
These aren't even good b8

I agree I would also give that movie a 10 divided by 10 which is 1. Fucking boring as shit movie with a guy with a potato launcher.

>>78894574
Not even close to subtle. Try again.

File: Pain & Gain wp.jpg (473KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1920x1200px

>>78894174
Not even fucking memeing, it's literally the perfect Michael Bay movie. His style was met with the perfect script and the perfect cast. Literally everything in this move is perfect. Quite frankly I don't like the fat Australian girl, but she was alright as Black Hawk's bitch. That's my only complaint, and that's personal taste. Anybody who doesn't like this movie is probably a plebeian, and I won't hesitate to call you that.

File: Vince Baseball.jpg (52KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x450px

>>78895642
>potato launcher

kek

File: the droids crash on tatooine, ralph mcquarrie.jpg (558KB, 1938x1300px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 1938x1300px

I like Star Wars 1977

>>78895728
Yeah this is truly a hidden gem. I just don't get how it ties into the Transformer stories?

>>78895893
I don't know if you're joking, but it seems that Bay makes a big money making blockbuster for the studio Transformers, then he gets an R-Rated project like Pain & Gain or 13 Hours.

File: Michael_Clayton2007.jpg (271KB, 940x1400px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 940x1400px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwBLPaUYqFo

>>78894574
>Avatar
>Rocky IV
Neck yourself, cockbreath.

>>78896131
>falling for the bait

>>78894574
Someone has the sample?

>>78896131
It has Star Wars FA in high tier. Certainly you couldn't fall for something like that.

File: eternal_primary.jpg (47KB, 640x430px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 640x430px

>>78894174

File: C2ys0gvWIAAIP_K.jpg large.jpg (50KB, 500x695px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x695px

>>78894174

Greatest Story Never Told is pure kino

File: The Talented Mr Ripley.jpg (58KB, 634x421px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 634x421px

>>78894174

Good pick. For me it's a tie between this..

File: Rosemary's Baby (1968).jpg (128KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1440x1080px

>>78898249
and this.

File: super anime chart.png (4MB, 3000x712px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3000x712px

>>78894574

File: All.jpg (43KB, 332x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 332x500px

>>78894174

>>78894174
DUDE NHILISM LMAO

>>78899572
>Dude "insert film's themes" lmao XDDD

>>78894574
This one isn't even trying

>>78899337
>fight with a cow

File: road warrior.webm (3MB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x800px

COME AT ME YOU FUCKING PLEBS

File: macready.jpg (33KB, 600x255px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 600x255px

>>78899823

File: pred.jpg (90KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1366x768px

>>78899837

>>78894574
What a pitiful attempt at baiting

>>78899857

>DO EET. KIL MEEE. DO IT NAOOO.

Anyone else related hard to Arnold during this exchange?

File: 1453497707679.png (2KB, 213x165px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 213x165px

>>78894174
I hated No Country for Old Men desu.

It was boring and I didn't like any of the characters. The bad guy was kinda interesting I guess, but not enough to make me care.

File: blub.webm (476KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 640x360px

>>78899857

File: callit2.png (541KB, 1280x544px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 1280x544px

>>78900056
>boring
>didn't like any of the characters
You don't have to like them nor sympathize with them, in order for them to work, which they did certainly did theme wise. What else didn't you like about it? Also, since when is boring valid criticism?

>>78900083
Early X Files, I'd say season 1?

File: blub2.gif (2MB, 300x160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x160px

>>78900128
no
blob 1988

>>78900146
My bad then, but I've seen that actress in the first or the second X Files season so it looked kinda familiar.

>>78900101
Have you ever watched a sports game where you weren't rooting for either side? You end up really bored by it because you're not invested in anything. It's just a bunch of guys running around with a ball.

Same with movies. If you can't sympathize with any of the characters then you don't care what happens to them and you get bored more easily. Which is what happened to me.

>>78900205
Still, hating a movie just because you didn't connect with it, even though it's more than good, is a bit ignorant. It's okay if you didn't like it and all that jazz, but why hate on it? Is it because everyone raves about it on here or what?

File: markshp.gif (491KB, 416x277px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 416x277px

>>78900187
i understand that, goddamn everyone was in xfiles

>>78895728
I thought they tried to blanket the horrifying shit they did with humor a little too much. The part where he cooked the dide's hands was pretty fucked.

File: IMG_1233.jpg (32KB, 206x305px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 206x305px

>>78894174

Agreed. Coens are top-tier filmmakers. I would also rate Inside Llewyn Davis as 10/10, as well as pic related.

>>78900230
Totally.

File: ((()))).jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1588x2862px

>>78894574
Hey, I know this game!

>>78900224
All I know for sure is that I hated it. I can't be entirely sure why. It's more about the feeling you get than checking off boxes for things that are supposed to make a movie good. Even if all the boxes were checked you might still hate the movie.

If I have to give reasons why then I'm just kinda guessing about my mental state at the time.

I just posted about it because they called it 10/10 and I disagree. Wanted to make sure my side was represented.

>>78900376
It's all cool, man.

File: 1482144305439.jpg (3MB, 1565x2823px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1565x2823px

>>78896555

one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises.

Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.